User talk:Newspaperwriter10021

Welcome!

Hello, Newspaperwriter10021, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jeffrey Oppenheim, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  ttonyb (talk) 23:26, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Jeffrey Oppenheim


The article Jeffrey Oppenheim has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable physician/politician lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:POLITICIAN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ttonyb (talk) 23:26, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Jeffrey Oppenheim for deletion
The article Jeffrey Oppenheim is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Oppenheim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  ttonyb (talk) 03:53, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Newspaperwriter10021 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.  D u s t i *poke* 04:17, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Warning on multiple accounts
Hi. So you're aware, editors are generally restricted to one account. Using multiple accounts as a way of making it look like multiple people are involved, particularly in an AFD discussion, is not allowed, and editing in this manner can result in you being blocked from editing. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:16, 9 January 2011 (UTC)