User talk:Newswire79

Image tagging for Image:RodneyB.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:RodneyB.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 01:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:RodneyB.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:RodneyB.JPG. The copy called Image:RodneyB.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 01:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Paparazzi22.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Paparazzi22.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 02:10, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Rod_234.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Rod_234.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:10, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Running From Media.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Paparazzi22.JPG. The copy called Image:Paparazzi22.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 16:00, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for writing the article Rodney burrell. Unfortunately, it doesn't conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, and has, as a result, been marked for deletion. However, please do not be disheartened by what may or may not happen to your first article, if indeed it is deleted - please continue to edit Wikipedia and add articles which conform with the inclusion criteria. For help, see Help:Contents. To find out what will probably be deleted, see Criteria for speedy deletion and What Wikipedia is not. Thanks, and if you have any questions, please ask them on my user talk page. To do this, click on my name (just after this sentence) and click discussion at the top and then the (+) button at the top.
 * All tags must stay with the hangons. This is not harrasment but a matter of policy. Thank you. -WarthogDemon 04:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I have asked an admin to help you. Meanwhile please stop removing tags or it will definitely be deleted and you will be blocked. -WarthogDemon 04:40, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Rodney burrell
Rodney burrell, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Rodney burrell satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Rodney burrell and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Rodney burrell during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. You are free to comment about its notability on the afd page. My apologies for the stress you no doubt have. Please consider that this is simply how things work here, and that I've been in your position. -WarthogDemon 04:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rodney_burrell, you will be blocked from editing. Do NOT blank AfD pages again. VTSPOWER 00:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Be Civil
Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -WarthogDemon 04:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:RodneyBurrell.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:RodneyBurrell.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 12:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Heather cox4 150.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Heather cox4 150.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Running From Media.JPG


The file File:Running From Media.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:06, 13 September 2017 (UTC)