User talk:Newtestamentcrew101

Welcome!
Hello, Newtestamentcrew101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Light vs Darkness in the Gospel of John, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Your contributed article, Light vs Darkness in the Gospel of John


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Light vs Darkness in the Gospel of John. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Gospel of John. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Gospel of John – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Light vs Darkness in the Gospel of John


A tag has been placed on Light vs Darkness in the Gospel of John requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=3b2I8v2Gh8oC&pg=PA19&lpg=PA19&dq=John+knows+only+of+negatively+coded+black+and+positively+coded+white+with+nothing+in+between.+The+first+he+identifies+with+%22this+world%22+and+%22below%22,+the+second+with+the+%22heavenly+world%22+and+%22above%22.+Today%27s+world,+in+contrast,+is+a+world+of+many+colors,+and+all+of+them+are+deemed+beautiful,+singly+and+together.+Moreover,+for+many+of+our+contemporaries,+the+world+above+is+an+impossibility;+in+modernity+it+seems+a+given,+as+Peter+Sloterdijk+has+put+it,+that+%22nothing+but+the+world+may+be+the+case%22.1+The+second+persuasion+is+that+pluralism+is+good+and+dualism+bad,+bad+in+the+intellectual+sense+of+being+just+plain+mistaken,+representing+an+illicit+reduction+of+the+world%27s+complexity.+Dualism+is+also+seen+as+bad+in+the+moral+sense+of+always+creating+ill;+it+suppresses+legitimate+plurality+by+seeking+to+shape+it+accordin&source=bl&ots=KWmYYCxHJ1&sig=7ZGXPGopyTBv8nAj6ZXmiszfHvI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=53s6VbDXDYLkavPugbgJ&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=John%20knows%20only%20of%20negatively%20coded%20black%20and%20positively%20coded%20white%20with%20nothing%20in%20between.%20The%20first%20he%20identifies%20with%20%22this%20world%22%20and%20%22below%22%2C%20the%20second%20with%20the%20%22heavenly%20world%22%20and%20%22above%22.%20Today's%20world%2C%20in%20contrast%2C%20is%20a%20world%20of%20many%20colors%2C%20and%20all%20of%20them%20are%20deemed%20beautiful%2C%20singly%20and%20together.%20Moreover%2C%20for%20many%20of%20our%20contemporaries%2C%20the%20world%20above%20is%20an%20impossibility%3B%20in%20modernity%20it%20seems%20a%20given%2C%20as%20Peter%20Sloterdijk%20has%20put%20it%2C%20that%20%22nothing%20but%20the%20world%20may%20be%20the%20case%22.1%20The%20second%20persuasion%20is%20that%20pluralism%20is%20good%20and%20dualism%20bad%2C%20bad%20in%20the%20intellectual%20sense%20of%20being%20just%20plain%20mistaken%2C%20representing%20an%20illicit%20reduction%20of%20the%20world's%20complexity.%20Dualism%20is%20also%20seen%20as%20bad%20in%20the%20moral%20sense%20of%20always%20creating%20ill%3B%20it%20suppresses%20legitimate%20plurality%20by%20seeking%20to%20shape%20it%20accordin&f=false. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RichardOSmith (talk) 17:23, 24 April 2015 (UTC)