User talk:Newyork40

Speedy deletion nomination of Maltby crags school (new)
Hello Newyork40,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Maltby crags school (new) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. – S. Rich (talk) 23:26, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maltby crags school (new)


A tag has been placed on Maltby crags school (new) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Widr (talk) 20:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maltby crags school (new)


The article Maltby crags school (new) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Poorly written page about non-notable elementary school

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:39, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maltby crags school (new)


The article Maltby crags school (new) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Poorly written page about non-notable elementary school

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widr (talk) 13:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Technical 13 (talk) 21:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Minecraft Animals Friendly/Neutral/Enemy
Hello Newyork40,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Minecraft Animals Friendly/Neutral/Enemy for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. JamKaftan (talk) 14:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=597077219 your edit] to Minecraft Animals Friendly/Neutral/Enemy may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * list of EINR its enemies in Nether regions
 * references

February 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Minecraft has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Minecraft was changed by Newyork40 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857932 on 2014-02-25T15:42:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at LoveFilm. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: LoveFilm was changed by Newyork40 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963173 on 2014-02-26T11:04:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:04, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Minecraft with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Optakeover (Talk)   11:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Minecraft. Optakeover (Talk)   11:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 11:33, 26 February 2014 (UTC)