User talk:Nexahs

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Members of the 33rd Dáil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James O'Connor ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Members_of_the_33rd_D%C3%A1il check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Members_of_the_33rd_D%C3%A1il?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Both people do not have proper pages yet, so they are being left there as place holders. Nexahs (talk) 11:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm Anita5192. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to MacGuffin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. — Anita5192 (talk) 16:57, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. FDW777 (talk) 11:47, 28 August 2020 (UTC)