User talk:NextGenSam619/Archive 1

July 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Philippe Coutinho has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Philippe Coutinho was changed by Sammanhumagain (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951976 on 2014-07-01T11:54:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sammanhumagain


A tag has been placed on User:Sammanhumagain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 16:53, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Dunn (footballer)


A tag has been placed on Jack Dunn (footballer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wysprgr2005 (talk) 07:23, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yan Dhanda (footballer born 1998)


The article Yan Dhanda (footballer born 1998) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. GimliDotNet ( Speak to me, Stuff I've done )  08:23, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rafael Páez


The article Rafael Páez has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RRD13 (talk) 16:35, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Rafael Páez for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rafael Páez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rafael Páez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. C679 11:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

--36.253.136.250 (talk) 08:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Match day live
What sport is this? What country is this? Postcard Cathy (talk)

It's not a sport. It's a television program for pre and post premier league matches. --Sammanhumagain (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matchday Live


The article Matchday Live has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 18:26, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Matchday Live for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matchday Live is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Matchday Live until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 09:19, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Stephen Darby, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:42, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

I appreciate what you are saying and I did this after looking at Bradford City's wikipedia page and read that he is the captain so I made the addition. I was just adding the fact Mattythewhite but didn't have the source to support it. --Sammanhumagain (talk) 08:40, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Verified Nepal 07:23, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

AFDs
Hi Sammanhumagain,

When nominating articles for deletion please also give a reason as too why you think it should be deleted - Failure to so will see it being Speedy Kept,

I've closed this afd as Keep because there wasn't a reason - If you want it reopened let me know and I'll reopen although you would then obviously need to state why on that AFD, FYI It's been renominated here

Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 23:57, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Hey, Davey 2010 Talk, I respect all the guidelines of Wikipedia and nominated the page for deletion because it fails WP:NFOOTBALL.--Sammanhumagain (talk) 03:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Liverpool Captains


The article List of Liverpool Captains has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NOTSTATS, content fork is not required

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 01:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Hey, I have improved the article and made sure that it does not fail WP:NOTSTATS. Sammanhumagain (talk) 04:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Liverpool Captains for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Liverpool Captains is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Liverpool Captains until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 12:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Liverpool F.C. Player of the Season for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liverpool F.C. Player of the Season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Liverpool F.C. Player of the Season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 15:38, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Football Today


The article Football Today has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG, no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 15:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Football Today for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Football Today is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Football Today until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 12:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Jordon Ibe
Hello. You probably don't realise that we may not add information of a personal nature, such as the nationality of Mr Ibe's parents, without adding a reference to a reliable source to verify that information. Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons is strict on this. How it's supposed to work is, you find the content in a reliable published source, and only then add the content and the source together. Adding content with a citation needed tag isn't acceptable. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * And again, re this edit. Please stop adding content without adding a source. Struway2 (talk) 17:09, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

please don't add protection templates to unprotected pages
Hi - thanks for your RFPP request, but you shouldn't add tags like pp-dispute to unprotected pages. It's misleading. Non-admins cannot protect pages and it just creates more work for us when we have to go back and remove it. (There's a bot that does that kind of thing but it's not very fast.)Thanks. :-)  K rakatoa    K atie   14:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * For more information, take a look at WP:PP, WP:ADMIN, and WP:RFA. In short, we learned early in the project that if we allowed everyone to protect any page they wanted, this wouldn't be a wiki much longer.  K rakatoa    K atie   14:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 21 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * On the FA Cup Final referees page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=657594685 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F657594685%7CFA Cup Final referees%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for April 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FA Cup Final referees, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Moss. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Referencing
Hi there, with regard to the content you recently submitted at List of Bollywood films of 2015, a note that the reference you provided, this, doesn't mention anything about a May 21st premiere. I've found another reference and added it to the article, but it would be appreciated if you'd please double check your references next time to be sure they support the content you are adding. Thanks and regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Liverpool POTY award
Hi, I saw you reverted my good faith edits - I assume the Player of the Season award given by former Liverpudlian players is something else than the Player of the Year prize awarded by "Liverpool F.C. itself"? This was not 100% clear at that moment. Regards, Kareldorado (talk) 05:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

"A page you started (2015 FIFA U-20 World Cup squads) has been reviewed!" Reply
I would love to complete the job, but I don't have all information I need. Some squads are released in their respectie languages and I'm not able to read most of them. I need help.--SirEdimon (talk) 01:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Rollback
Hi Sammanhumagain. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

@Beeblebrox Thank You!!! I will contact you on your talk page.Sammanhumagaint@lk 16:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

pending changes reviewer user right
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.  K rakatoa    K atie   00:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Regarding User name change
Hello, @User:KrakatoaKatie

I've almost been editing Wikipedia for about a year now. Initially I didn't know that generally Wikipedians don't go by their names as users. So I made my userpage with my real name. I am active on social media with that same name so someone may react negatively to me in social media regarding my contributions here. So my point is I want to change my userpage name and I don't know the process to do it. Additionally I have some sub pages in the userpage(please see my userpage) and I want to change the names in all those pages as well. Could you help me? I would also appreciate if you suggested me some names to replace the current one as I can't think of a one. Cheers!!!Sammanhumagaint@lk 05:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:CHU is the place for you. Sorry, but suggesting usernames isn't something I do. :-)  K rakatoa    K atie   15:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

List of wifi router companies
Okay 2 things-first off its not a BLP so that does not apply-also for some reason it looks like it was not put correctly on the page or put on the talk page of the creator. But if you think it should be deleted do a normal prod or a afd. Wgolf (talk) 03:49, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

If I had to request for deletion I would do it but I don't see any problem for it to be deleted. But I want the page to have a lead and at least one proper citation which I hope you can provide. Once again I want the article to be expanded rather than being deleted. Cheers!!! Sammanhumagaint@lk 03:52, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Not sure what it would be-but you don't put up a BLP prod for that though as that is for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 03:54, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 2015 Copa América Group A. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 04:42, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

About the deletion
Hi there, I have seen about the deletion conflict. About that if you please look at the previous Copa America articles like the 2011 one they havw their own pages so therefore the groups should have their own articles. The  Awesome   03:03, 6 June 2015 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Awesome 10 (talk • contribs)

If that's the case then it's okay. Sammanhumagaint@lk 03:08, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * So will the deletion template stay or will it be removed? The   Awesome  Awesomesig.png 03:16, 6 June 2015 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Awesome 10 (talk • contribs)

Don't worry I will remove it immeadiately!!! Sammanhumagaint@lk 03:20, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok then thanks :) -- The  Awesome  Awesomesig.png 03:26, 6 June 2015 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Awesome 10 (talk • contribs)

And if you want to sign my guestbook you are welcome.Sammanhumagaint@lk 02:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

BLP PROD error
You placed a BLP PROD tag on 2015–16 Valencia CF season. Please note that this tag is only to be used on unsourced articles about living people.- MrX 14:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Another thing to note about BLP PRODS: I'm not sure if Twinkle is supposed to do this automatically or not, but a few of the articles you prodded didn't get patrolled, which should be done if an article is tagged for deletion. Pishcal  — ♣ 02:15, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Adam9007. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, James Birtwell, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 02:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Patrick Roberts, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. FA website linked to in article lists one cap for U18s. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:14, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Where am I supposed to be looking? The best I can find is this and it only gives the line-ups. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:21, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

@User:Mattythewhite Sorry but my internet connection has only Wikipedia now so I can't see that link but I checked the u 18 England team wiki page and saw the change made by a user who is very reliable. User:Clicriffhard generally edits on these age level wikipedia page of the English teams. So I don't believe he has made a mistake. I think he might have come off the bench as a substitute. If it is just 1 then you're welcome to revert it yet again. Cheers!!!


 * Hi. Please read WP:BURDEN. If information is removed without a source, it's up to you to provide a source when re-adding it. If you continue to re-add this info unsourced you face being blocked (either through WP:3RR or WP:DE). Thanks.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 17:37, 10 June 2015 (UTC)


 * "but my intention was to keep the list there till another fellow provides a reference", sorry, that's you're job per WP:BURDEN. Otherwise how do we know it's true?  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 17:45, 10 June 2015 (UTC)


 * True. If/when I find a ref, I'll re-ad the text, and not before.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 17:49, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Patrick Roberts
Hi, best thing to do is wait until his profile on the FA website updates and adds his second cap, then change it. Unfortunately some editors take themselves far too seriously and although they know that the information is correct, they'd rather remove it, leaving the article inaccurate and out of date. It might be the "correct" thing to do by the rules, but it's extremely unconstructive. Don't let it stop you editing though! Eng66 (talk) 18:09, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Infobox dates
Hi, when updating international stats in the infobox you should update the ntupdate or nationalteam-update parameter by adding five tildes, which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 13:22, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

@(talk) Thank you. I will do it from next time. But provide the wiki page of this method so that I can look at it in detail. And I hope you don't revert edits done without having vandalism or any out of context aspects like you did yesterday. Cheers!!! Sammanhumagaint@lk 13:27, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * See the infobox documentation. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Just a quick message to remind you about this, I noticed you didn't update the timestamp when updating Ruben Loftus-Cheek's stats. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 11:27, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Jordan Lussey
Yes Luseey was a reserve player but he had a professional contract with the club so he is also eligble to be put their. Skyblueshaun (talk) 13:36, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

@Skyblueshaun (talk) Hello, mate I don't know abut this and I think we should contact other editors or maybe view the passed decision. The reason I reverted was because many youngster have not been included here since the last two seasons. But I am not sure about Lussey. Cheers!!!Sammanhumagaint@lk 13:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes I appreciate that but Lussey was loaned out to Bolton Wanderers last season and is on last seasons page. So if the case is that he won't be shown on here when released because he is a youngster then why edit a youngster being loaned out. On many other club season pages youngsters with professional contracts weather in first team or not are still shown to have left the club as a whole. Skyblueshaun (talk) 14:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

@Skyblueshaun (talk) mate I will undo my edit and we'll see What happens.Sammanhumagaint@lk 01:22, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Archiving my talk page
Hi User:KrakatoaKatie, recently I have been trying to archive my talk page but it is not working properly. It would be great if you fixed with the addition of a bot and archiving monthly. Cheers!!! Sammanhumagaint@lk 05:51, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * You're free to copy the setting I use for the bot (or the settings of any other editor who uses MiszaBot), but I'm afraid I don't have time to set up talk page archiving for you. Sorry. :-) KrakatoaKatie 02:35, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, and one more thing? Just leave your initial message on someone's talk page instead of placing talkback and making them click over to your talk page unnecessarily. It's a deprecated template anyway, plus it's an extra step and it wastes time. Thanks. :-) KrakatoaKatie 14:47, 25 June 2015 (UTC)


 * @User:KrakatoaKatie your point is valid but I put up that template because my request was personal and didn't want to other see it and don't want it to be misused? I still don't know if my archive is working or not. I need an expert to confirm it.Sammanhumagaint@lk 14:58, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Your recent editing history at 2015–16 Manchester United F.C. season shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.As I told you, you want the content changed and should discuss. Qed237&#160;(talk) 14:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)


 * @User:Qed237 Well, if that's the case then, you have also been involving in it and have just checked that you reverted three times as well. So should I tag you on your talk page then according to the rules? Sammanhumagaint@lk 14:07, 4 July 2015 (UTC)


 * First of all, you added the content and has added it 4 times, while I reverted only three. Secondly you refused to listen to WP:BRD and open a discussion. Thirdly, I attempted to open a discussion and actually discuss. Some major differences there. Qed237&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 15:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

2015–16 Manchester United F.C. season
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 2015–16 Manchester United F.C. season. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. GiantSnowman 15:14, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

@GiantSnowman I am aware of this. But as of now you know I didn't do anything wrong. And can you explain why editors are blocked because of only three reverts? I think one such case is not enough to block a user. Sammanhumagaint@lk 15:36, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Read WP:3RR. GiantSnowman 15:47, 4 July 2015 (UTC)


 * @GiantSnowman Will I be bolcked? If then what happens if I undo all my four edits? Sammanhumagaint@lk 16:02, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

That made little sense.
Seriously, you think that the column on the right is better then the huge chunk of sourced material removed on the left? Take a look again. They took sourced material and added that she is singing or sang in one film and then subsequently left it unsourced. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:09, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
Rihaz (Talk to me • Stuff I did) 09:22, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
Rihaz (Talk to me • Stuff I did) 14:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
Rihaz (Talk to me • Stuff I did) 08:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Signature
Hey there! I've been really busy with real life lately and will be so it will take much longer than expected to get your signatures ready. I will continue to try and make something good but have no idea how long it will take. Sorry for the inconvenience! Rihaz (Talk to me • Stuff I did) 05:08, 12 July 2015 (UTC)


 * No worries mate take your time and I know they take time and that even three designs. For now I have no problem with continuing with the present one. You can forward it to me after you complte it. Take your time. Cheers!!! NextGenSam619t@lk 05:14, 12 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Would you like one similar to mine? I am thinking of more creative things with special symbols and characters, but how would you like it? Z-small-VA-64x88.svg (Talk to me • Stuff I did • Global Info) 08:59, 12 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Well the reason I asked you to make three signatures was because I actually don't have ideas regarding signatures except the simple ones. You can make one like yours but make sure it's different from yours. The rest two you can make according to your creativity. I will choose any one from them. And yes take your time there is no hurry. Thanks!!! NextGenSam619t@lk 17:33, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Barnstar Award
Hello, Thank you it shows that edits are being appreciated. Thank you once again. Skyblueshaun (talk) 16:14, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Shackell
The BBC report states "Derby County are set to re-sign defender Jason Shackell after they agreed an undisclosed fee with Burnley". Clearly, the transfer is not complete yet. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The transfer's now been confirmed by Derby. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:34, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Warning re copyright violations
Your addition to List of Bollywood films of 2015 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

The content is a direct copy and paste of the creative work of Koimoi. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  12:34, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Club infobox
Hi, the season and position parameters are for the details of the "last completed competitive league season", per Template:Infobox football club. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * @Mattythewhite got it. Thank you for the info NextGenSam619t@lk 15:25, 24 July 2015 (UTC)