User talk:Nexus Reborn

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Nexus Reborn, does not meet our username policy.

'''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).'''

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:
 * Add  You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 14:23, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * A rename will not absolve you of a conflict of interest. What articles would you work on if unblocked? —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v Dittobori ) 03:45, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

I can give a hundred examples of games you have listed here with external links to fan sites. How is mine any more of a "conflict of interest"? I have no affiliation with the game company and I'm not a business and I make no money (in fact I spend money) to host this website. And to quote your alert "Your username is the only reason for this block." What does that mean?
 * That's the standard text of a username block template, but in this case, the fact that you seem to be trying to linkspam a forum whose name matches your username means that you are, regardless of whether or not you're making money off it, conflicted. And in any case, Wikipedia uses .—  Jeremy  ( v^_^v Dittobori ) 06:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Well, do as you may, it's no skin off my nose. It is funny that you list thousands of games with links to similar sites and even links that directly promote the capital interest of the website, such as the game's developer or publisher. But that's not a conflict of interest? I would wager that by your definition, not a single external link on your pages is without conflict of interest. Any link to another website is "promoting" that website and most of your links go to the game publisher's site who are "businesses" and stand to gain monetarily.
 * Those websites are actually official websites and pertinent to the article. Yours is not, and even if it were, it would be reverted by anyone as obviously conflicted. There's a very stark difference between official websites and fan websites and fora, and policy bears that out. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v Dittobori ) 19:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

How is my website not pertinent to the article when it is designed exclusively for and about that particular game and it is likely the ONLY website that is? The game doesn't even have an "official" website so mine is probably the most official in existence. And you are simply wrong about other links being official websites because I have seen many that are fan sites and are not operated by the developers or publishers. If you insist that a site such as mine is not allowed in a "free encyclopedia", then perhaps you should change the name to "Nazipedia".