User talk:Nexusb

Re: Bernard Edlington
Normally I would move such a page into your userspace so you could work on it, but I don't see much potential for notability. If you wish to contest the deletion, you are welcome to open a report at deletion review. Cheers! east. 718 at 16:43, 11/7/2007
 * User:Splash granted your request with this comment: "Since this was deleted following Articles for deletion/Bernard Edlington, I will restore to a temporary location at User:Nexusb/Bernard Edlington, where you can work on it. Once done, please post a request in the main part of the page below asking to have the deletion set aside. If you are feeling confident that the new article will overcome the objections, you can just move it into place yourself, but note that an article which is substantially identical to that which was deleted will itself be deleted on sight. Splash - tk 01:59, 11 November 2007 (UTC)"
 * Splash's comment about "the main part of the page below" refers to the main Deletion review page. Rossami (talk) 00:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bernard Edlington 316.png
Hi did you take this pic?Genisock2 (talk) 17:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Re Image:Bernard Edlington 316.png
Yes however I will be uploading another (recent) better one tonight. Please delete it.

Image copyright problem with Image:Bernard Edlington 316.jpg
Hi Nexusb!

We thank you for uploading Image:Bernard Edlington 316.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Bernard Edlington
Although Orangemike deleted it, you were commenting on Jезка's talk page, the closing admin for the AfD. I would recommend taking your case to the deletion review. It does seem a bit hasty to me, especially since no reason was given, but I'm not sure what differences there were from the time of the first AfD, so it might constitute a speedy delete. (Oh, and the vulgar language on Jезка's talk page was by someone else.) MrKIA11 (talk) 20:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Nexusb. I'm not actually an Admin, I simply closed the AFD when I noticed that Orangemike had already deleted the article. BTW, sorry if you were offended by the message on my talk page, it was added here by Bob the cow farmer who has been blocked as a vandal. I simply hid the message from public view, although it shows up when anyone edits the page. Jезка  (talk) 08:54, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bernard Edlington
I have nominated Bernard Edlington, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Bernard Edlington&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Guy (Help!) 19:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Warning
You are using sockpuppet accounts in a manner prohibited by policy. If you continue to do this, you will likely be banned from editing. Guy (Help!) 22:30, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * No, absolutely not Nexusb (talk) 09:59, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

File:Bernard Edlington 2003.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bernard Edlington 2003.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Bernard Edlington 316.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bernard Edlington 316.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Bernard Edlington 2008 JP rman community.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bernard Edlington 2008 JP rman community.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Keizoku


The article Keizoku has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability, does not seem to meet WP:Notability (film)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dana boomer (talk) 21:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Keizoku for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article  Keizoku  is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Keizoku until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dana boomer (talk) 15:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)