User talk:Neyagawa

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! cab (talk) 02:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Genetic classification of the Korean language
Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. The idea that Manchu or other Tungusic languages are part of the Buyeo family is not accepted. Beckwith (2007) would also disagree that Korean is a member of that family. cab (talk) 02:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

And I'm not a Chinese, so please don't throw out the bad faith accusations. --Caspian blue 01:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

You've been told to discuss your edits. Continuing to edit without doing so can and will be seen as disruptive.--Crossmr (talk) 11:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Crossmr (talk) 11:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for persistent racist personal attacks and insults against other editors. The block duration is one week, for now. Should you continue your attacks, after the block or during it, you will be blocked permanently with no further warning. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

You have in fact also continued to call the editors you disagree with "Chinese propagandists" even in your unblock requests. That's still personal attacks. (As it happens, these editors are neither Chinese, nor are they propagandists, certainly not of Chinese positions.) If you can't accept that other editors here might in good faith have a well-informed perception of the state of current scholarship that differs from yours, and if your only way of interpreting those editors' stance is to assume they are "Chinese propagandists", then you probably have no place in this project. Think about it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to abuse of the unblock process. You may still contest any current block by e-mailing [mailto:unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org unblock-en-l], but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
 * As you choose to repeat, rather than retract racial commentary during your attempts to request unblock, I have removed the ability for you to repeat them by removing talkpage access for the duration of your block. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 12:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Japan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 20:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Korea, you may be blocked from editing. Oda Mari (talk) 21:01, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Japan. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. ... disco spinster   talk  21:06, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Vianello (Talk) 21:24, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 21:27, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Referring to other editors with racially derogatory terms like "Jap" is absolutely unacceptable on Wikipedia, for any reason. Do not do this again; with your previous editing record, it will be more than grounds for an indefinite block. - Vianello (Talk) 21:30, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Im-hak Ree
A tag has been placed on Im-hak Ree requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 10:32, 8 October 2010 (UTC)