User talk:Nezamali

Speedy deletion nomination of Bangor University Law Society


A tag has been placed on Bangor University Law Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Inks.LWC (talk) 23:00, 12 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Re your message: The article was deleted because you did not establish why the group is notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. Additionally, the tone of the article was promotional with the use of the words "we" and "our" along with the general description of the society.  You are welcome to recreate the article if you can establish the group's notability and write the article in a neutral point of view. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:18, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Bangor University Law Society
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Bangor University Law Society, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 00:31, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bangor University Law Society


A tag has been placed on Bangor University Law Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ttonyb (talk) 17:01, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Bangor University Law Society
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Bangor University Law Society, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 17:05, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Your addition to Bangor University Law Society has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  ttonyb (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bangor University Law Society, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding copyrighted material to articles.  ttonyb (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:25, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

More explanation
Copyright is a serious issue for Wikipedia: see Copy-paste: "Copyright does not need to be asserted – if the source says nothing about licensing or copyright, you must treat it as copyrighted." Just asserting authorship is not enough: for one thing, we have no way to be sure that someone on the end of a wire is in fact the copyright owner. Wikipedia can only accept material copied from elsewhere if a formal copyright release is made as described at WP:DCM. In practice this is seldom worth doing because material written for other purpose is usually too promotional or otherwise unsuitable for an encyclopedia article - Wikipedia should not be mistaken for a notice-board.

In any case, your article was not deleted for copyright reasons but because it did not indicate Notability, a requirement to have a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia is selective about subjects, and does not expect to have articles about every society, or every person, company or band. Notability, in Wikipedia terms, is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones (like the University site) and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people independent of the subject thought it important enough to write significant comment about? More detail in WP:Notability (organizations and companies) and the WP:FAQ/Organizations

Experience shows that very few student societies can meet this test - see College and university article guidelines, particularly the section "Student life." It is usually best to cover societies like this by a mention in the main University article. I should also say that because we know that many of our 3,500,000 articles are below standard, appeals on the lines of What about those other articles are not accepted - each article is considered on its own merits. JohnCD (talk) 21:25, 15 May 2011 (UTC)