User talk:Nfarky

Welcome!
Hello, Nfarky, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Scott Salvator, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MrOllie (talk) 16:45, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Salvator


A tag has been placed on Scott Salvator, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrOllie (talk) 16:45, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:52, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Salvator


A tag has been placed on Scott Salvator, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrOllie (talk) 14:55, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

1== January 2017 == Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 15:37, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

PLEASE SEE BELOW

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... i took out anything that could be seen as bias. i am not being paid to create this page. it is not an ad or promotion. --Nfarky (talk) 15:28, 26 January 2017 (UTC) nfarky

Reading the article, I don't think that it's promotional in a way that would require speedy deletion; however it may still need significant rewriting to present it in a more neutral fashion. MereTechnicality (talk) 15:35, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

i did not remove it, please take off your speedy deletion. I have edited and re edited it, and MereTechnicality cleared my page. Nfarky (talk) 15:39, 26 January 2017 (UTC)nfarky
 * As anyone can see in the article history, in fact you did remove the tag. Leave it for the reviewing Admin. (Also, note that MereTechnicality is not an admin). - MrOllie (talk) 15:43, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

i am new to wikipedia editing, so i am sorry i do not know how i did that. the last edit i thought i did was fixing one of the citiation links because it said it was unlinkable. please re look at it, i am really trying not to be bias. everything on that page is a fact, please tell me which particular sentances or phrasing you have a problem with and i will fix it. Nfarky (talk) 15:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)nfarky


 * I'm not an administrator, that's correct, but I did think that the page was OK for advertising. It didn't quite adhere to NPOV, but I didn't think it warranted speedy deletion for advertising. However, since it's been deleted already, I think it is a good idea to draft it in userspace and post it in AfC. In the future, Nfarky, you may not want to recreate articles repeatedly, as this might lead to you being blocked and the page being salted; it's also considered bad form to remove speedy deletion templates unless you're the person who put it there in the first place. When I have the time, I'd love to help you out with your draft; in the meantime, though, I'd recommend reading up on WP:NPOV and WP:PROMOTE (as these were the reasons your original article was deleted), as well as the manual of style on how articles should be written. I have some work that I have to do right now, but I will take a look and help to improve it later. MereTechnicality (talk) 20:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott Salvator has been accepted
 Scott Salvator, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.