User talk:Ngh93

License tagging for File:Steve oedekerk.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Steve oedekerk.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:DB Sweeny.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DB Sweeny.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:47, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:DB Sweeny.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:DB Sweeny.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mosmof (talk) 02:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Steve oedekerk.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Steve oedekerk.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Mosmof (talk) 02:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The source of the file, http://www.spokeo.com/Steve+Oedekerk+1/Jul+29+2006+Los+Angeles+Ca, does not indicate that it is released under a free license: in fact, beneath the image it is labelled "content &copy;2015 W.E.N.N. All Rights Reserved." Please read WP:Image use policy; even if there is no copyright notice, very few images that you find on the Internet are released under a free license suitable for Wikipedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:D b sweeney a p.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:D b sweeney a p.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 22:38, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:SteveOedekerk barnyard.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:SteveOedekerk barnyard.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Steel1943 (talk) 22:52, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:JasonRaize.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:JasonRaize.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Steel1943 (talk) 23:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at File:JasonRaize.jpg. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:.  Super Mario  Man  ( talk ) 20:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:160204-news-joe-alaskey.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:160204-news-joe-alaskey.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:160204-news-joe-alaskey.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:160204-news-joe-alaskey.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:160204-news-joe-alaskey.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:160204-news-joe-alaskey.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 18:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Images you find on other websites should only be uploaded to Wikipedia if they are clearly in the public domain, or have been released under an appropriate licence. McGeddon (talk) 18:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Block notice
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:54, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Not only do you continue to add unsourced personal information to biography articles when you are well-aware that it is against policy to do so, your edits to Kent Osborne where you introduced four different dates back to back gives the impression that you are not here to edit constructively. If such edits continue once the block expires I imagine the next block will likely be indefinite.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:54, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I will leave this for another admin to review, but would like to know if you've read WP:RS and WP:BLP? -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, I've read the two pages. Although I still find them a bit confusing. I think I'd love to be unblocked now please. I've learned my lesson I will not add anymore unsourced data. I promise. Ngh93 (talk) 23:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Can you explain what type of sources are considered reliable in the context of our WP:BLP policy? -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:14, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The types of sources that are considered reliable in the context to our WP:BLP policy are reliable published sources. Could you please unblock me or at least give me an expiration date please? I promise you that I've learned my lesson. Ngh93 (talk) 21:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

{{unblock| I understand that i need to site my sources. Could you please unblock me so I can edit again? I'd do anything to be able to edit again on wiki. It's my favorite thing to do. And I'm a dedicated editor. Could you please unblock me or at least set an expiry date for me? Ngh93 (talk) 16:15, 23 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Ngh93, I will unblock you if you agree to use reliable sources when adding information to biography articles. If you're unsure whether a source meets WP:RS, then you need to discuss the source on the article talk page (or via the reliable sources noticeboard) prior to adding information until you have a better understanding of the requirements. As we discussed previously, website databases such as IMDb do not meet the criteria. Do you agree to these terms?-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree 100%. I promise when I edit to use reliable sources when adding info to biographies. I've learned my lesson. I'm ready to edit very carefully. And I'm willing to do whatever it takes to understand these complex wiki requirements. Ngh93 (talk) 02:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Jennifer Hale article
The birthdate and place have been confirmed by reliable sources. It does not need to be removed. The year is left empty but referenced with footnote to indicate that a lot of effort was taken to verify that the year cannot be pinpointed, see her talk page for more information. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 00:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Randy Quaid. Ron h jones (Talk) 21:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

File:SAGWA-12.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * @User:RonBot Sorry about the image upload. I just thought the previous one was rather blurry and small. To be honest, I find these wiki guidelines and rules rather complicated and difficult to understand--especially when in comes to uploading images. I guess I'm just used to uploading new files like on fandom. Well, I looked at the previous image and it didn't seem to have any copyright tags or anything corrupted. Does that mean the better quality version I updated can stay? Or should I upload one with slightly smaller size? Just in case. --Ngh93 (talk) 17:58, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

17th April 2019
Could you not fight with Binksternet over your edit on Barbie Dolphin Magic please - he has reverted your edit for a reason.

Please make constructive and meaningful edits in the future.

THANKS

Malmsimp (talk) 10:04, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * @Malmsimp I was just trying to improve the plot summary which wasn't complete. It stopped in the middle. And now it's back to the incomplete summary. Could I please fix that again? Don't we useually have hte full film plot written out including the ending? --Ngh93 (talk) 17:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

July 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Kaitlyn Robrock, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. JDDJS ( talk to me  •  see what I've done ) 02:47, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Ainbo
The website you used for your information appears to be a blog, which is not considered a reliable source. Please do a little extra work before adding sources to verify that they are good sources for information. Also, your edits broke most of the article. Make sure you know how to cite your sources and you use the Preview button before publishing your changes. BOVINEBOY 2008 10:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

I'm sorry it's just this film's release date is very confusing! Some sources say November (without a specific date) Most say February 10th, 2021. Tell me what date next month does it come out if that's the case? --Ngh93 (talk) 16:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)


 * I don't know, I'm not in charge lol. We just go by what the sources say. BOVINEBOY 2008 10:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

April 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)


 * is now closed. I should have seen that you'd been blocked for this before and had already made assurances that you would not add unsourced content. Discussion of this block really needs to occur on your talk page. -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 17:37, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I don't know. I'm an Aspie, so . . . . -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 17:38, 1 May 2022 (UTC)