User talk:NgocVo

Speedy deletion nomination of Son Kim Land


A tag has been placed on Son Kim Land, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  DGG ( talk ) 05:51, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Much of you text was not references at all, was referenced only to the company (OK for hard facts but not opinions), or websites if dubious value. The article was all about what you are selling, with little in the way factual inofrmmation such as number of employees, profits or turnover.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: several successful real estate investments... emphasis on high-tier market... from huge capital investments... offers long payment schedule and lower price... prospects for high profit margins.—and so on; it's basically a sales leaflet.
 * Not a reason for deleting, but to add references, put your references in the the text following the fact each supports using . Then    at the end will automatically generate a numbered list. Look at Hoang Anh Gia Lai Group in edit mode to see how it's done. Also add categories as in that article

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  14:20, 18 May 2015 (UTC)