User talk:Nguyễn Trí Nguyên

February 2020


A page you created has been nominated for deletion because it is a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and has unsourced content, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people, along with attack pages, are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing. Cahk (talk) 09:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Kepler-1972 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kepler-1972 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kepler-1972 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lithopsian (talk) 15:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * But i founded a topic: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11459, is it worth enough? - TriNguyen12348 10:13, 30 January 2022
 * Wait, you're right, Kepler-1972's system was proved it doesn't exist, I searched a lot but found only one like: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11459, it is best that can you remove a page until NASA reveal it's a star system? And i should edit candidates in my sandbox - TriNguyen12348 10:25, 30 January 2022

Welcome!
Hello, Nguyễn Trí Nguyên, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Kepler-737. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Gpkp  [ u • t • c ] 06:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I have seen Wikipedia for the past 2 years, and I appreciate. - TriNguyen12348 - 6:33 - Febuary 1st, 2022 (GMT-8)

Ways to improve Kepler-737
Hello, Nguyễn Trí Nguyên,

Thank you for creating Kepler-737.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"A lot of this looks like WP:OR, WP:SYNTHESIS at best, but it is hard to be sure since there are no inline references. Tagging for now, but large chunks of the text are likely to be removed if they can't be attributed to external sources."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lithopsian (talk) 15:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok thank you for reminding - TriNguyen12348 (talk) 3:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Kepler-737, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Cassiopeia  talk  03:28, 18 March 2022 (UTC)