User talk:Niazim1

Proposed deletion of Complex Adaptive Communication Networks


The article Complex Adaptive Communication Networks has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no evidence

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth 23:04, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

AfD
"Newly emerging" is an admission that the subject may not (yet) be notable enough for a general encyclopedia so I will let the AfD discussion for complex adaptive communication network run its course. &mdash; RHaworth 22:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * As a matter of fact, I disagree with that comment because of the well-known fact in the academia (Universities/Professors) that there are numerous Journal and conference papers on this area shows the area is well-developed however by emerging, it means it is perhaps not more than 5+ years old in terms of research. Assuming you are conversant with Academic Journal publishing, it takes several years before a single academic paper gets from initial work to publication in any Journal of high standing. Paper first goes through a proper peer-review of several months to perhaps an year and then issues are decided and so on. I would definitely like you to kindly disprove me if you have any solid evidence from academic publishing to contradict this statement. Thanks. I am sorry to say that I now understand why one important reason why sites such as Wikipedia are not regarded as a primary reference in academic journals is perhaps uninformed statements such as this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niazim1 (talk • contribs)

Wikipedia insists that it is not a primary reference. We reject anything that falls into that category. &mdash; RHaworth 14:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

The article has been massively edited and as I had said earlier, I was going to add all the references in time. It no longer reflects any single person's papers. Please review again and if you agree, you should change the AfD comment as that is not very polite, and an incorrect accusation (See my explanation above).

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Zidanie5 (talk) 11:18, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi there,

Thanks for the edit/comments. Here are my replies:

A. I am afraid, I would not agree about notability. See, in notability guidelines for Journals, a Journal is notable since it is indexed in a large number of Bibliometric Indices. This one is indexed by a large number of databases including Thomson Reuters Master List, who release the yearly JCR Impact factor. Once a journal is indexed, exactly one year from the indexing date, the journal is given an impact factor. B. The text was not meant to be promotional. Actually I copied-pasted the Journal scope from Springer's website introducing the Journal and give its original link. Can you kindly go to the site and verify yourself? Thanks.

Here is the actual words from Notability guidelines: "The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the journal is included in the major indexing services in its field. Examples of such services are Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Scopus.". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academic_journals)

As such, this journal is listed in the Science Citation Index.

C. Incidentally, my source for the Journal infobox was another Journal article page that I had started earlier and was accepted. Please see Wiley-Blackwell's European Transactions on Telecommunications Page. :)

Thanks so much for the time anyways,

Cheers


 * Hello, yes, I agree about the fact that the subject of your article is probably notable. Probably I clicked the wrong item in the scroll down window with reasons for declining, because there are three other problems with the article:
 * as it stands, the article is a copyright violation of the page you linked (the official website); you see, unless the page states a copyright license compatible with Wikipedia, it is presumed as "all rights reserved", and cannot be used in Wikipedia!
 * Most of it is unreferenced (for example, where can a reader verify that it is actually indexed in the mentioned journals?)
 * As I said in the Comment, it is very promotional in its tone, and not suitable for an encyclopedia
 * That said, I admit I used the wrong reason for declining and I apologise for that. Please feel free to improve the article (rephrase and use an encyclopedic tone, neutral point of view) and resubmit for review. Zidanie5 (talk) 06:45, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi there,

Thanks so much for the reply. I am a newbie here so definitely appreciate your advice. I shall check out the links.

Cheers

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cognitive Computation concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cognitive Computation, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Cognitive Computation


Hello Niazim1. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Cognitive Computation.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:35, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Cognitive Computation was accepted
 Cognitive Computation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  DGG ( talk ) 22:43, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Proposed deletion of Cognitive Computation


The article Cognitive Computation has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:55, 22 September 2013 (UTC)