User talk:Nibblesworth

David Dreier
That edit seemed to be reasonably neutral. It had cites and all. Your deletion of it was POV, not the edit itself. RickK 22:42, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)

Fred Thompson
The article as it currently stands is not that bad, IMHO. I'd be cautious about any drastic changes. -- Orange Mike 17:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Signing posts
In the future, when posting to a talk page, please sign your posts using 4 tildes ( ~ ). This will make your username and the time appear. That way people can follow discussions easier. Thanks. I'm signing here with 4 tildes and it automatically make it appear like→ --Ali&#39;i 17:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Ah, thanks for the info! Nibblesworth 17:33, 6 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Aole pilikia! --Ali&#39;i 17:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

"Pro-Thompson" Nibblesworth modifying other's Talk comments
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. r/tpv by Nibblesworth

Talk page vandalism Removing the comments of other users from talk pages other than your own, Nibblesworth, is generally considered vandalism. Vandalism includes the action of any removal or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia.

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. r/modifying user's comments by Username:Nibblesworth

 Modifying users' comments Editing other users' comments to substantially change their meaning (e.g. turning someone's vote around), except when removing a personal attack (which is somewhat controversial in and of itself), is generally considered vandalism.

Actual other user's comments modified by Username:Nibblesworth; this is from an archived version of this page, as edited by 4.88.54.144 (Talk) at 14:07, 9 April 2007: :and also these comments by Nibblesworth from the User talk:Orangemike  page [emphasis is mine]: Fred Thompson

Howdy Orangemike ! Saw your comments on the last edit for Fred Thompson, and I'd like to let you know that I'm currently putting together information that will help me create a more comprehensive, fact-centered article. I'm pro-Thompson, but DO NOT want to use the site as a campaign tool for him. I truly think this site should represent facts, and readers can make their own decision. Since you mentioned in your edit that you are not a Thompson fan, I was wondering if you'd help me construct something neutral? I'll compose it all, and if you'd review it to look for bias, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nibblesworth (talk • contribs) 17:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC).

4.88.54.144 14:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Reads to me like Nibblesworth is self-admittedly incapable of contructing his own NPOV edits or NPOV verifiable "facts" pertaining to the U.S. Senator Fred Thompson Lorrie Morgan 1994-1996 relationship within the Fred Dalton Thompson page. Why is Nibblesworth et al so vehemently opposed to letting the "readers can make their own decision[s]" pertaining to the factual and very adult U.S. Senator Fred Thompson Lorrie Morgan 1994-1996 relationship?  Only considering comments from registered Wikipedia users by Nibblesworth et al at the Talk:Fred Dalton Thompson page in my opinion demonstrates an editorial intent contrary to the philosophy of John Stuart Mill and the Wkipedia principles pertaining to resolving content dispute and a markedly biased "pro-Thompson" point of view.

"Facts"??? It reads to me as if Username:Nibblesworth is merely cherry picking facts to form his own his specific set of "facts" that he (or she) before allowing Wikipedia readers to [sic] "... make their own decision[s]" (and just what "decisions" are you refering here to, Username:Nibblesworth?) regarding the lenghty two year relationship between Lorrie Morgan and U.S. Senator Fred Thompson. 4.88.48.58 12:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)