User talk:Nicbball22

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on South Sioux City, Nebraska worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Chasingsol(talk) 05:33, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page South Sioux City, Nebraska has been reverted. Your edit here to South Sioux City, Nebraska was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/UsaFloorHockey, http://www.facebook.com/UsaFloorHockey) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:58, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at South Sioux City, Nebraska, you may be blocked from editing.  Neil N   talk to me  04:13, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

I fail to see how it is promotional since everything I included was purely factual in that last edit if you require me to use a different source I very well can do that for example here is another one.

Even here's their press release from the Dakota County Star paper http://www.enterprisepub.com/dakotacountystar/news/ssc-special-olympics-floor-hockey-team-to-represent-usa/article_8efb140c-83f8-11e1-b8cd-0019bb30f31a.html#.T4c05NsNuNc.facebook

Here is said problematic edit "South Sioux City is home to Team USA's unified floor hockey team going to the 2013 Special Olympics World Games happening January 26, 2013 in PyeongChang, South Korea. South Sioux City's Special Olympics unified floor hockey team is a registered 501(c) non-profit. The team is made up of 20 people, 16 athletes and 4 coaches. "
 * We don't use press releases as sources for these kinds of things. Also, the addition "...is a registered 501(c) non-profit. The team is made up of 20 people, 16 athletes and 4 coaches." gives too much detail. The section you're editing is about the town's history, not the hockey team. -- Neil N   talk to me  13:06, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

The people that comprise the city and it's history are one in the same. Without the people there is no city. The hockey team is and will only be from that city and is a by product of the city so to remove them from the history of the city would be detrimental. Just as South Sioux City was named an all-American city the city has also produced this special olympic team that was named team usa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.236.58.49 (talk) 13:16, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not saying there should be no mention of the hockey team. I'm saying the proposed edit needs to be trimmed. -- Neil N    talk to me  13:20, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

I can live with that agreement.


 * I've pulled the floor-hockey paragraph again, since the website cited doesn't appear to mention South Sioux, and since it does make a rather up-front pitch for donations, Facebook friending, &c. I tried to find an independent source for this information, but couldn't.  There appeared to be an article in the Dakota County Star, but it looks like a verbatim printing of a press release&mdash;note the phrase "...you can visit us on Facebook...", where "us" doesn't appear to be the Star.  (The article also used "it's" as a possessive in its first sentence, which suggests that the Star copy-editors never even looked at it.)


 * If a good third-party source can be found, the material can be re-inserted; but it should probably be in a new section, "Sports", rather than in "History". Ammodramus (talk) 00:14, 10 May 2012 (UTC)