User talk:Nicdragon

Welcome!
Hello, Nicdragon, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Slipstream: Rogue Space, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 37.71.246.14 (talk) 21:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Slipstream: Rogue Space


A tag has been placed on Slipstream: Rogue Space requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 37.71.246.14 (talk) 21:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)


 * It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account. The article Slipstream: Rogue Space consisted substantially, if not entirely, of material you had copied. JBW (talk) 22:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)


 * If you copy material from anywhere on Wikipedia, you must state where you copied it from, to comply with Wikipedia's licensing terms.
 * Please don't post text translated by Google translate into Wikipedia articles. Very often Google produces results which superficially look alright, but which have significant failures to translate properly, sometimes causing serious inaccuracies. JBW (talk) 22:58, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I thought I provided sources to the places I used, but I will remember, I will try to improve this article, thank you for explaining the problem Nicdragon (talk) 23:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If by "provided sources" you meant that you said where you copied text from, then you have misunderstood, perhaps because you are confusing copyright infringement with plagiarism, which is a very common mistake. Saying where you have copied material from doesn't make it alright to copy that material without suitable copyright permission. I also see that at least some, and perhaps all, of the recent content of User:Nicdragon/sandbox is copied from elsewhere. I don't wish to put in the considerable amount of time it would take to do exhaustive searches to determine whether of it is copied from elsewhere or some of it is your own work, but that doesn't matter, because you can simply remove everything except material which either: (1) you wrote yourself or (2) you now provide proof that the material is published under a suitable free license. If that means that you have to remove it all, then remove it all. Please deal with this before you do any more editing. To avoid any risk of misunderstanding removal of all copyright-infringing material is a requirement, not an option, and you may be blocked from editing by an administrator if you don't comply. JBW (talk) 23:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If I correct the article and ask you to check it, will I be able to publish it? Nicdragon (talk) 00:49, 21 February 2024 (UTC)