User talk:NiceAdam

NiceAdam, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

== Your submission at Articles for creation: Terrified: Anti-Muslim Fringe Organizations Became Mainstream (August 27) ==  Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysailor was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Terrified: Anti-Muslim Fringe Organizations Became Mainstream and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Terrified:_Anti-Muslim_Fringe_Organizations_Became_Mainstream Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Happysailor&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Terrified:_Anti-Muslim_Fringe_Organizations_Became_Mainstream reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Happysailor  (Talk) 19:12, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (And the Crusades). Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 04:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for letting me know and giving me a chance to improve. In the meantime, I tried adding content which reference a no doubter; a professor of religion and Islam at a major American anniversary: professor Carl Ernst whose work is always peer-reviewed by scholars. But, someone reverted that edit as well. And, the two remaining references are from very un-reliable sources: NRO and Daniel Pipe's publication. Neither one of these pass the WP:RS test on Islam. They are both self-proclaimed experts and their current writings will not pass any peer-reviewed process from an acceptable scholar. Am I missing something? If I am, please let me know. If not, please send an alert to the other editors as well and alert them to stop undoing my edits. I am following up with you under good intention assumption. Please don't let me down.--NiceAdam (talk) 01:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ayaan Hirsi Ali because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 04:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

I have reverted you edits to both The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (And the Crusades) and Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Please seek consensus for changes to the above articles. Discussing your proposed changes in the article's talk pages can help achieve a consensus. You might want to read WP:BRD and WP:CONSENSUS. Jason from nyc (talk) 14:48, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I have followed your example and fixed other non-reliable sources in these pages. Per WP:BRD, WP should not become a hate site which riles White and radical militia shooters to commit deranged acts. see also Anders Behring Breivik. These individuals are enablers of the militias who tarnish the American image: www.salon.com%2F2014%2F07%2F22%2Fa_much_larger_and_more_dangerous_movement_right_wing_militias_thrive_post_bundy_and_the_media_wont_talk_about_it%2F&usg=AFQjCNHCyUsMb8yGjaWq9FpSL1gA0CzHlg&bvm=bv.102022582,d.aWw NiceAdam (talk) 15:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * You are not discussing your proposed edit changes in the talk pages of the articles. Try to reach a consensus with the other editors. Jason from nyc (talk) 15:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I have tried will try more; you should too stop backing false info on WP.
 * Please use the article's talk page The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (And the Crusades) to discuss specific on the edit in question. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.--NiceAdam (talk) 01:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jason from nyc (talk) 15:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Thank you. Please see my response on Hirsi's talk page. We need to use Hirsi's Talk page for specific reasons of why you are reverting my changes. At the moment you are not giving me any reason for undoing my edits. See you in the talk pages.NiceAdam (talk) 15:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Please don't pretend that I'm trying to complement you. The above is what I wrote. Jason from nyc (talk) 18:24, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Niceadam, it is not that you received this message because you were at dispute with the editor. It is a alerting message that you should take in good faith. --AmritasyaPutra T 18:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking your time and welcome back. I spend a great deal of time to find relevant and significant content for the benefit of WP. But, in a flash, an editor reverts my hard work. It can be bit frustrating when they don't try to collaborate with you to improve the language or content or provide a specific reason which I can use to improve. Can you please also alert Jason and the friend of yours Rs something. I need them to use Hirsi's Talk page for specific reasons for their undos; preferably before they press the undo button. If you happen to go to her Talk page you will see that I have already using her Talk page quite generously even before the threat from a user above; even for relatively straightforward changes. Please feel free to comment here and let me know of anything else. Truly grateful for your time and understanding.--NiceAdam (talk) 00:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Terrified: Anti-Muslim Fringe Organizations Became Mainstream concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Terrified: Anti-Muslim Fringe Organizations Became Mainstream, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Terrified: Anti-Muslim Fringe Organizations Became Mainstream


Hello, NiceAdam. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Terrified: Anti-Muslim Fringe Organizations Became Mainstream".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)