User talk:NiceDay/Archive 1

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, NiceDay. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:47, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your username
Hello. Your username is the same as the name of an actual hotel, a hotel whose name in roman letters is "Day Nice Hotel" and whose website is here. The hotel is owned and/or run by 株式会社デイナイス (Kabushiki gaisha Deinaisu), aka DayNice Hotel Tokyo Co., Ltd.

Wikipedia's policy page about usernames impels me to ask how you are related to this hotel or the company.

Please answer here, rather than on my own talk page. -- Hoary (talk) 01:10, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your advice. I have received the same advice and I have requested to change my username HERE and HERE and I am waiting in some wikis and processing in some wikis. So please wait.NiceDay (talk) 07:10, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


 * My user name was changed successfuly NiceDay (talk) 22:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Comfort women by the United States in occupied Japan
Hello NiceDay,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Comfort women by the United States in occupied Japan for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Zakhx150 (talk) 15:59, 9 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your message.NiceDay (talk) 04:01, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Comfort women. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 16:25, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Please see Talk:Comfort womenNiceDay (talk) 04:01, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring
Hi NiceDay. You should reconsider edit warring while a warning is on your talk page. That just doesn't look good. Hash it out on the article's talk page, take some time to find some sources, convince fellow editors your case. And please understand: just because you participated on the talk page, it does not allow you add whatever you want to the article. If it doesn't work, hey, Wikipedia is a big place with lots of other articles that need improving. Blackguard 17:55, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Comfort women in Japan after World War II


A tag has been placed on Comfort women in Japan after World War II requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
 * disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Binksternet (talk) 18:25, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comfort women, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ianfu and Wianbu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Comfort women. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:17, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * I have undid your removal of the section, because you did not propose the removal before editing. I think that the merging is better than the removal. But I do not want to cause an edit war. I will not oppose to the removal if the consensus of removal is made in the discussion in Talk:Comfort women. May I make a new section to discuss? NiceDay (talk) 03:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing at comfort women. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:32, 8 July 2015 (UTC)