User talk:NicePony

April 2023
Your edit to Chevrolet Chevy II / Nova has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. DreamRimmer (talk) 17:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The content of my post was unique in wording. Although similar to multiple publication which have inaccurate descriptions of the Rally Nova. The photo was also found to be in public domain on multiple websites with no reference to copyright whatsoever. I have republished my text as I don't believe it is copyrighted in any way and is considerably different form text I have read in a number of publications. I did not post the photo since this seems to be what you had issue with even though it is not found at the url you referenced. NicePony (talk) 19:05, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Please also look at this. DreamRimmer (talk) 19:20, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I see you agreed with my original content not being in violation. I have added my original photo back in and did some further editing. Thank you. NicePony (talk) 21:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I just notice you did not approve my editing. I accidently sent a message to myself. At any rate I have re-edited all the text and can find nothing on Conceptcarz.com that would lead me be to believe that I am in violation of any copyrighted material. My post is worded far differently, has a lot more information and corrections to information that someone else posted that is in correct. Nothing has been cut and pasted from any other online content. I also notice that 9 other patrol sites find nothing out of the ordinary with my editing. My editing has been resubmitted at this time. NicePony (talk) 00:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * On further review of the page you referenced Chevrolet Nova Third generation Model Information | Conceptcarz.com I find no violation of copyright for the text I personally created and published and no violation of the uploaded photo. I would prefer the original photo on my post as it is a much better representation of an all original Rally Nova than the one I added back in of a my modified Rally Nova. This information was added to the wiki page as it far better detail what the Rally Nova option was than the minuscule reference to the model in the original post by others. Us care nuts love to have details and accuracy. 67.185.13.247 (talk) 19:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * On further review of the page you referenced Chevrolet Nova Third generation Model Information | Conceptcarz.com I find no violation of copyright for the text I personally created and published and no violation of the uploaded photo. I would prefer the original photo on my post as it is a much better representation of an all original Rally Nova than the one I added back in of a my modified Rally Nova. This information was added to the wiki page as it far better detail what the Rally Nova option was than the minuscule reference to the model in the original post by others. Us care nuts love to have details and accuracy 67.185.13.247 (talk) 20:00, 8 April 2023 (UTC)