User talk:Nicgf

how to link another article so that it not be count as orphon?
 * Other articles have to link to that orphaned article to no longer make it an orphan. SwisterTwister   talk  17:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Please suggest how to make the page keraniquehaircare live on wikipedia?
 * It is live, but is now tagged for speedy deletion under G11/Adverting. TheMesquito  buzz  08:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Nicgf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Keraniquehaircare, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Oiyarbepsy (talk) 07:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Keraniquehaircare


A tag has been placed on Keraniquehaircare, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 07:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Article recreation
I've deleted the page because ultimately the page was previously deleted at AfD and considered to not be notable enough to warrant an article. In order to re-create the page you would first have to make an appeal to User:J04n, who closed the AfD. If he declines to restore it, you will then have to go through deletion review and request that the AfD decision be overturned. You will have to give coverage to show how this product line now passes notability guidelines, which can only be done through reliable sources that discuss the product itself in-depth, such as newspaper articles and reviews. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:52, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Keranique hair


A tag has been placed on Keranique hair, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WordSeventeen (talk) 06:12, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keranique (April 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Keranique and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Keranique Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Onel5969&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Keranique reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 17:23, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I've blocked you because as far as I can see, your main purpose here was to try to write articles about Keranique Hair Care products. These pages were repeatedly deleted in the past and I even warned you back in February 2015 that you should not try to recreate these without going through AfC. You did make an attempt to use AfC, but the page was declined because it read like an advertisement and had issues with sourcing. When you tried recreating it in March, it still had the exact same issues that led to its decline at AfC and its deletion at AfD. At this point you had to have been aware that both of these things would be problematic, yet you added this to the mainspace anyway. You've made a handful of other edits, but by large your main purpose here seems to be to promote Keranique and I have to assume that if left unblocked you would continue on in this path. There is a chance that you can be unblocked, but you'd need to do the following:
 * Declare your conflict of interest (WP:COI). I did not warn you about this last time, but by now it seems clear that you are likely someone who was paid or otherwise asked to create an article on this product line. You must declare your COI. I must warn you: if you are unblocked and we suspect that you do have a COI and you are not being truthful, you will be reblocked with little to no chance of any further unblocks. I'll be very honest here: I am almost completely certain that you have a COI so I would find it very difficult to believe that you do not have a COI in this case. If you do not have a COI you will need to explain why you continually tried to create the same article over and over again, under different titles and always with promotional content and buzzwords. These are not normal actions for someone who does not have a COI.
 * Show how you will edit Wikipedia in a positive manner if you are unblocked.
 * Do not make any direct edits on topics with which you have a COI. If you want to create an article it must be created through AfC rather than direct creation.
 * You must stop trying to re-add articles on Keranique to Wikipedia. This is one of the most important requirements, other than disclosing your COI. You would be able to request its creation, but that would be about it. You've written too many promotional versions for me to think that you would be able to edit neutrally on this topic. Notability for the product is also a factor, since you still have not provided enough to show where it would overturn the prior AfD and deletions.
 * If you can do the above, you might be unblocked. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)