User talk:Nichalp/Archive52

Re: Image deletion
Since it's been deleted, it would need to be undeleted or reuploaded to be put back into an article. I would think just getting a better image would be a better end result though. Though, I don't remember anything about this image since I've gone through thousands of images during that time frame and can't remember any specifically. MECU ≈ talk 15:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you could just retrieve the image, send it to the graphics lab and have then vectorize it and then just use that one? I'll guess that it was removed because it was LQ or vandalism, and then things went from there. I'm not morally opposed to this (or any) image, it's just we should be using the images we have. I used to track daily the number of orphaned images. It's back over 100,000 which is why I'd go through and nominate for deletion or try and use them. If you can find a use for the image and improve it, by all means, you don't need my approval. MECU ≈ talk 19:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

User talk:JianLi
fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: author requests deletion --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:53, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

User talk:JianLi/Archive 1
fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: author requests deletion --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:53, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Allahabad High Court. :) --Just my 2 cents -- Hemanshu 03:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Indonesia - FAC
Hello there. Thanks for your comments in the Indonesia FAC. I have a few questions or requests for further clarification. Would you mind if I discussed them here, and I can then post their resolution (or otherwise?!?) on the FAC page.
 * 1. Mos for units (m, mi, km, C not followed) -- see formatting for Climate of India.
 * The style in Indonesia should be converted to whatever style is the most accepted. But, I need more specific direction and I don't want to chop and change back and forth - I'd like to get it 'correct' the first time, as you can no doubt understand. :) Can you provide a link to a definitive set of rules? Is this the guide?
 * By the way, I'm just looking at Geography_of_India and i need to confirm apparent inconsistencies:
 * a total land area of 3,287,590 km² (1,269,219 square miles).
 * should actually read:
 * a total land area of 3,287,590 square kilometers (1,269,219 m²)., right?
 * 2. Image sizes are inconsistent, try thumbing the images, removing the set pixel.
 * Good point. I will see what I can do - note, many pics have varying aspect ratios. But this is consistently changed over and over by editors with different ideas/opinions (groan).
 * 3. Many words linked repeatedly.
 * YEs - that is a lot of work to check, but must be done.
 * 4 {{tl|main}] should come before an image in a section
 * Done - i think. I found two instances &.
 * 5 It's interesting that Indonesia shares a sea border with Australia, but not India. Considering that the northern tip of Aceh is 140 odd km from Indira Point in the Nicobar Islands, what would be the basis for the omission?
 * I think I will change this to "land borders with x x x & x, and also neighbors x x x & x" in line with FA article Australia. I don't actually know whether it does officially have such sea borders - it is just an assumption which is not good enough. As for the India border question, there needs to be a cut-off. Personally, I think mentioning the proximity of India simply because Nicobar islands is close to Aceh is dwelling too much on an insignificant technicality for a summary article - by the same token we could also then introduce Thailand, Cambodia and Brunei. Where do we draw the line? Anyway, I am not saying 'no' and I am open to your further thoughts (Incidently the main india locator map does not include the islands as part of India - and error no doubt. )
 * 6 (not an oppose) Maps should be SVG
 * I'm no good with maps - i will see, but it seems this is just a non-FAC-killer preference?
 * 7 ...these include Indians... -- inaccuracte; India was not a unified country back then; "Indian kingdoms" would be more accurate.
 * I have changed it in this instance as it works fine - but we should be careful about extrapolating that point to other instances both on this page and countless others. Could be an ugly WP precedence - for many countries. But, maybe that is a point for another day. :)

OK - that's it for now. Please reply if you can - and if we can resolve the issues, would you be so kind as to strike them off? many thanks - they are good improvements, but I really want to have a clear direction before I make major changes. Merbabu 03:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Update: I've now addressed each point and I think we can leave 6 for now, right? Please see if you agree - it would be nice if you could strike out any resolved points. :) thanks for the improvements. --Merbabu 06:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Jana Gana Mana
Thanks for your views. Even I echo your views. Can you place them on the Jana Gana Mana talkpage- possible resolution --~KnowledgeHegemony~ 07:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Himachal Pradesh FAC
I would like to tell you that now there are no citation needed tags on the page. Kindly justify your comments. Rest i'll try to improve. 08:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Now take a look at the article and kindly justify each and every comments added by you. thanks, 11:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Indonesia FAC
Hi, Merbabu has done some work to address the issues you raised here Featured article candidates/Indonesia. Could you strike out the ones you believe have now been completed? Thanks. (Caniago 15:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC))

25 May
Hi - it's the weekend and I'd like to tidy up as much of the FAC as I can. Did you have any outstanding concerns? Could you check? What about the svg's? Initially you suggested it wasn't an FAC killer, and furthermore, I don't understand much about what the advantages might be. COuld you strike out and 'answered' concerns - even write "support" (or am I pushing my luck? lol). But thanks for the review which has significantly improved the article. regards --Merbabu 08:44, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * PS, sorry about the units and the MOS - I did look closely at the dates and numbers section and thought I'd got it correct. Merbabu 08:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

I've gone through your points and addressed them appropriately (IMO). They were all useful and identified problems. The only points i query 2 & 4; i can accept that wording can always be improved for clarity/prose but they were worded in such a way to deal with the historical complexities which I've expanded on a bit on the FAC page. This is particularly the case with the issue of independence.
 * Review 3

As for the strike outs and your time pressures, if you are agreeable, may I strike out your points for you? At least for your first two reviews if you are satisified with the responses. kind regards Merbabu 01:29, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Many thanks
Thanks for your input and suggestions on the Indonesia FAC. They have made it a much better article, and I have learnt a lot. Hope to see you around, and perhaps we can 'compare notes' on other articles in the future, so drop me a message sometime. (my other current projects are U2, Indonesian National Revolution, and Indonesian architecture). Also, I will have to talk to Indon to see if he can fix that locations map. regards Merbabu 01:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Indya my dawg
Username is libelous. Please block him/her. Knowledge Hegemony  14:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Political History of medieval Karnataka
Hi. Could you please find time to do copy edits on this article. I have done quite a bit in the last one week since Tony1 left his message on the FAC discussion. He has asked for further copy edits today and has himself copyedited the lead section. If you are busy, could you suggest names I could contact.Dineshkannambadi 14:37, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

GAC backlog elimination drive
This form message is being sent to you either due to your membership with WikiProject Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Good article candidates/List of reviewers. A new drive has been started requesting that all members review at least one article (or more, if you wish!) within the next two weeks at GAC to help in removing the large backlog. This message is being sent to all members, and even members who have been recently reviewing articles. There are almost 130 members in this project and about 180 articles that currently need to be reviewed. If each member helps to review just one or two articles, the majority of the backlog will be cleared. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :GAReview underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the GAC talk page. --Nehrams2020 01:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Personal Information
As I said, someone sends taunting emails to me via the wiki mail link they lose the expectation of privacy. This has happened to me before, once, and no one said boo about it. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 03:11, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * For all I know its a screen name he used when he emailed me. But, fof the record, I have read the policy about posting of personal information on WP:HAR and it will not happen again. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 03:25, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Admin divisions map - very nice, but...
Wow - what a pic. It looks fantastic - where did it come from? I moved it a bit, it's a shame it's not a little smaller, but then possibly the text would not fit. many thanks. Merbabu 04:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, the more i think about it, the more I think it is fine, it's a big country with many provinces and its brilliant functionality i suggest overrides size concerns. kind regards Merbabu 05:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Review 4 on Indonesia...
Please, you are going to have to me more specific about which part is not clear. As I replied yesterday on that page, I am not going to sacrifice accuracy for clarity, or preferred/preconceived ideas of history. Please help me out. Merbabu 14:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Nichalp, thanks for your concern about my images. In case you haven't ever stepped outside of Mumbai, let me tell you that it rains everywhere in the world. In fact, there are more places in the world where it rains, than there are places in the world where palm trees grow. Just an fyi. thanks. Nikkul 14:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for that information. My, I really need to step out of Mumbai! Did not know it rained in places other than Mumbai. What an enlightening piece of information! =Nichalp   «Talk»=  14:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah it does! Cheers Nikkul 01:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Re:Bot
Yes, it is possible. I can write a python script for it. There may be a faster alternative. Sumanthk had recently done something similar with villages using WP:AWB. Let me check with him on this. Are you familiar with AWB? If no, then I would recommend you try it out. Regards, Ganeshk  ( talk ) 16:17, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I have requested for CSV upload feature to be added to AWB. If implemented, it be easy to handle these kinds of tasks rather than writing seperate python scripts for each task. I will keep you posted on this. Regards, Ganeshk  ( talk ) 22:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks =Nichalp   «Talk»=  17:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

History of India is a candidate for WP:ACID
Hi,

Did you know that the article History of India is a candidate for Article Creation and Improvement Drive (shortened to WP:ACID)? If you want it to be the article for the week (and perhaps get it to FA status), perhaps you would want to go the page and vote. Thank you. Universe=atom •Talk•Contributions• 18:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Osho
Hi, Thanks for the assessment! If there are any obvious concerns that would need to be addressed to get the article from B to GA, please drop me a line. Jayen466 19:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Which infobox would be the appropriate one to use? Jayen466 16:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Comments about Indian empire maps
Some maps like kadamba are not drawn on top India locator map and do not have capitals. Some maps like Hoyasala map have red color instead of orange color shade. What is your take on following uniform standard for all these empire maps? Political history of medieval Karnataka and many empires articles use them. Are there any guidelines or proper forum for them. mlpkr 01:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Too bad
It is too bad that your suspicions about my sockpuppetering were wrong. I invite you to perform as many check users as you can. But next time you suspect someone being a sock of me, make sure that they dont irritate me with their attachment to that irrelvant memorial picture. It makes more sense for socks to agree with each other instead of disagree. No? Anyway, have fun in Bombay. Isn't it like monsoon season or something? Nikkul 01:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey there
Hi

I had submitted several articles for assessment by Wikiproject India. I note you have removed the WP India tag from the talk page articles stating 'not in scope'. I was under the impression that an article can fall under multiple wikiprojects. Therefore film articles, bollywood actors etc fall under WP India and WP Indian cinema. In other words, the tags shouldn't have been removed.

Is there any policy or guideline to follow in such cases?

Regards, xC | ☎  06:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

A related issue. You had marked some assessment requests as not in-scope. I believe the articles below are in-scope.


 * Aap Ka Suroor - Indian music - future taskforce?, until then it will tagged with India.
 * 1996 Men's Champions Trophy (field hockey) - Indian sports - future taskforce?, until then it will tagged with India.
 * Aap Ki Khatir (2006 film) - Indian cinema -

Please comment. Regards, Ganeshk  ( talk ) 06:56, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Not related,bro - this is  the issue :P I was referring to the very same articles, these are the ones I had submitted for assessment. xC | ☎  07:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Noted. :) -- Ganeshk  ( talk ) 07:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm replying here to avoid cross-posts. To evaluate the ratings, think of India as a single entity. What makes up India? History, geography, people, companies, law, indigenous musical instruments; all these can be clubbed under India. Movies on the other hand are only produced in India -- they have nothing much with India as an entity -- it hasn't contributed to India as a whole. Look at it the other way. Take away Peshwa rule, and India is not complete. Take away Tawang, and India is not complete. Take away Aap Ki Khatir (2006 film), and it does not make a difference. Exceptions to this are movies that India has presented to the Oscards, award winning entries etc. Bollywood actors come under WP India as Indian citizens. Similarly a tournament which was hosted in India has little to do with India. If there was a WP Indian hockey, then it would come under that project. =Nichalp  «Talk»=  15:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Perhaps. I disagree with you on the above point, as I believe its a little difficult for me as an individual editor to decide whether or not a particular topic is of any importance to the country as a whole. Still, since the above articles aren't really all that important, it may be fair to exclude them from Wikiproject India. Thanks for clearing that up. Happy editing! xC | ☎  15:52, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Hoysala map
Hi. In the map Image:Hoysala Empire extent.svg you drew for me a few months back, when you find time, could please drop a visible "dot" to mark the location of Halebidu the capital?Dineshkannambadi 20:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Division naming convention
Hi Nichalp. Whenever I see a district named "X District", I've been moving it to "X district" per WP:INDIA convention. But I've been coming across "X Division" as well. Is the naming style the same? Should I move them to "X division"? Thanks. Saravask 00:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Template:Indian symbols and Template:National symbols of India
Indian symbols National symbols of India Which one should we keep in this article? Both were made by you. What is strange is the 'sari'(in the 2nd template)? One template can be deleted.-- Knowledge Hegemony  06:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Also was disappointed to see you not participating in the Jana Gana Mana issue. My last post about it is still there on this page. -- Knowledge Hegemony  09:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

maps
Yes, I have been a bit lazy with learning how to draw maps (been reading too many books:). I need to learn that to make me a more rounded wikipedian.Dineshkannambadi 18:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Would appreciate your comment on proceeding on Gracenotes, RfA
Hi Nichalp,

As one of the Bureaucrats recently active on RfA, I would like your opinion on how to handle Gracenotes' rather difficult RfA.

There are a huge number of opinions (over 200 supporting and over 70 opposing) and a great deal of argumentation. I would like to reserve a "Bureaucrat Chat" for the really, really difficult and unique situations, like Danny. My concerns here are that:
 * The bureaucrats should not be put in the position of being "supervoters," evaluating everything the community already hashed over, but at a "higher" level;
 * I would like to see this RfA separated from some very strong and quite valid (to the individuals most involved) emotion, as much as this is possible; and
 * Almost all the detailed opposition revolves around a single issue that I believe has acquired a life of its own separate from the candidate's qualifications, and I think Gracenotes at least deserves a chance to make a coherent presentation on the issue and allow the community to express their opinions anew in that light.

I had earlier posted a way forward that can be found (with some comments) at Bureaucrats%27_noticeboard. I would like to proceed according to the six steps I suggested, which has the assent of both the Candidate, and the first opposer on the BADSITES issues, SlimVirgin.

I would be most grateful if you would contact me at my talk page with your assent, different solution and/or comment and discussion. Thanks! -- Cecropia 21:03, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oops you missed me there. Was the bewitching hour at my time. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  18:30, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Email
Hello Nichalp. I sent you one. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Bhulabhai Desai Road is the official name.
Hi

Please do not use Breach Candy in place of Bhulabhai Desai Road. Already there's a lot of confusion, kindly do not alter the real name. Breach Candy is highly informal. Kindly revert it back to that original i.e. Bhulabhai Desai Road.
 * There's no confusion. I've posted a comment on that talk page. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  18:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Gracenotes RfA from Cecropia
Nichalp, could you clarify on your comment about commenting tomorrow? On which issue are you planning to comment? I was about to post a planned resolution. Should I wait? -- Cecropia 19:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Here you go
Nichalp, I became upset when I read this comment. I think that the level of tolerance you've shown in dealing with all of the newer users at Talk:India over the last several months (if not years) is amazing (it's more than I could ever hope to do). Keep it up; maybe they can someday hope to become as fine a contributor as you (and each get around to writing 16 FAs to boot). Hope you don't mind that I gave one of the few types of barnstars that you don't have! Saravask 23:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Username redirects
You had nicely usurped my name some time ago — can you merge/redirect User:Sesshōmaru, User:Sesshômaru, User:Sesshoumaru and their talk pages to my username/usertalk space? It is allowed, I presume? The names aren't even in use and if they were, they would've been blocked for being too identical to mine. Though the "Sesshoumaru" account is strange; it was created, but never contributed. Lord Sesshomaru
 * It would be a shame for them to get blocked for being too identical to mine. Plus, I know another user that was doing the same: having similar usernames redirect to his userspace. Lord Sesshomaru

Cfvh ---> Charles
Hi, you just completed my user name change. Thank you :) Can you move my talk page to the new location?

User_talk:Cfvh → User_talk:Charles

Thanks! Charles 12:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh, it might be best if you replied here so I don't lost the reply somewhere. I have already recreated my old account so that I can use it as a redirect. Charles 12:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Done =Nichalp   «Talk»=  13:04, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! :-) Charles 13:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

My name change
Hello. Please check your e-mail. I have sent you an e-mail regarding my user name change here:

The arbcom is already over (you based your rejection on "pending arbcom resolution"), and as noted there on the page, I have been placed on a revert parole along with everyone else. If I post a message on the arbcom page and notify the admins, then I dont see what the problem is. Thanks.Azerbaijani 13:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Peterpowell360 ---> TheGeekLord
Thanks for processsing my nickname change request :) TheGeekLord 15:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Concerns about false representation of reasons for opposing Gracenotes
Hi, Nichalp. I am concerned that oppose votes in the Gracenotes RfA may be dismissed as being due to the candidate's failure to give 100% support to the idea of removing 100% percent of links to attack sites regardless of context. I'm particularly concerned at your comments, where you say that most of the opposers opposed because they thought Gracenotes supports linking to these sites, and in fact he doesn't, so promotion would be appropriate. I think that is a misrepresentation (though I'm sure it's an innocent one) of the views of those who have concerns about trusting the buttons to someone who shows the attitude that the candidate shows towards a site which engages in feverish attempts to find out the real life identity of Wikipedians (posting what they believe are their photos, trying to contact what they believe are their ex-boyfriends, or egging on those who do). As I pointed out at the Bureaucrat chat talk page, it's a bit like seeing lots of people opposing a candidate because of concerns over civility, and then dismissing those votes by claiming that the opposers opposed because they wanted to see an exaggerated, excessive, obsequious politeness.

I will accept whatever the decision is, but at the very least, I would hope that the bureaucrats would try not to be influenced by misrepresentations of the concerns of the opposers. Could I request that you read my post, linked to above? I admit it's long, and I apologize for that. But it does make what I believe are very important points &mdash; especially the one that I recently supported someone for adminship after he said that he thought it would be okay to link to attack sites in the "Daniel Brandt" and "Criticism of Wikipedia" articles; and that SlimVirgin thanked him for his reply and didn't vote. Thanks. Musical Linguist 16:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi Musical Linguist. I understand your point equating civility with the proposal. On the other hand, it would be quite an ask to paint all the oppose votes with the same brush. As far as the BADLINKS issue is concerned, I haven't discounted any oppose vote on the topic, rather given them a lower base oppose. I also have considered that there are over 200 community members who have expressed confidence in Gracenotes ability in handling the tools. Meanwhile, I am curious as to what the other bureaucrats have to say, so will defer any further comments on the issue till there are more posts on the chat page. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  18:37, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

John ← Guinnog
Hi Nichalp, it looks from the logs as if only half of this usurpation went through: John has been renamed to John (usurped) but Guinnog has not been renamed to John. WjBscribe 16:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No prob. Didn't want anyone to create User:John while it was briefly available... WjBscribe 17:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
For performing my change of user name. Could you please also move my user talk? I didn't want to do it myself in case I screw something up... Thanks in advance. --John 17:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I actually did this just before I came over here :-). WjBscribe 17:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you both very much. --John 19:29, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

DieWeibeRose → DieWeisseRose
Thank you. --DieWeisseRose 20:43, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Sikkim geography stubs
Hi, Can you please fix the related template so that the articles tagged with the template go to Sikkim geography stubs category and not to India Geography stubs category. I have tried unsuccessfully.Shyamsunder 16:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Please do not bother .I just found it is working.Thanks