User talk:Nicholas66

Hi, please don't
 * add the name of the Falabella in the caption. It is not needed and is in fact discouraged for the privacy of the owner.
 * remove content without commenting why (removing stuff without reason is counted as vandalism)
 * change information that is supported by a reference. If you disagree with the info, you can use inline tags such as dubious and take the issue to the page talk
 * redo without discussion edits that have been reverted or undone previously - this can count as vandalism, or editwarring. Pitke (talk) 16:13, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi, We have changed the photo because a photo that shows a group of horses and says 'one may be a Falabella' is irrelevant. The page is specifically about Falabellas, not miniature horses in general. It is like having a page on the 'Supermarine Spitfire' and having a photo of old war planes with the caption 'one of these may be a Spitfire'. The Photo we have inserted is of 'Falabella Festivo', that is his name, the prefix 'Falabella' being his name as he was born on the Falabella ranch in Argentina. We have owned him since 1994. We changed the info. - 'eight inches tall at birth' because it is nonsense NO horse has EVER been born alive at that size. Fact. We have been breeding pure Falabellas for 30 years, the smallest adults at birth are sixteen inches.

March 2017
Hello, I'm Justlettersandnumbers. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Falabella have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:34, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * One other thing: why do you call yourself "we"? Wikipedia accounts are strictly for individual personal use – if there's more than one of you, each should have a separate account. Institutional or group use of accounts is not permitted. Can you clarify? Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ray Mumford


The article Ray Mumford has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 20:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, I'm Justlettersandnumbers. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Falabella have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:16, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Kilverstone Hall, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. ''You've been asked again and again not to do this. Please do not add even one more link to www.falabellahorses.com.'' Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Ray Mumford for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ray Mumford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ray Mumford until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:13, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

December 2020
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:56, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:FalabellaMare&foal.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:FalabellaMare&foal.jpg, which you've attributed to falabellahorses.com. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)