User talk:Nicholsi

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Nicholsi! Thank you for your contributions. I am WeijiBaikeBianji and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 20:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Zack Cernovsky
He is a psychiatrist, as is evident from the sources cited (e.g. the psychiatry faculty page for the Schulich School, and the press release describing him as "Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Western Ontario, Canada". (Also see here which also calls him a psychiatry professor.) Thus I'm unsure why you changed his profession to "psychologist". Everymorning (talk) 21:47, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Cover-Up of Canadian Psychological Association (CPA) Healthcare Ethics Controversy
Warning Message: Repeated vandalism Nicholsi, You have repeatedly made major edits to the Canadian Psychological Association page by deleting entire well-documented sections without providing any explanation in an edit summary. You have done this twice already, although I am going to put it back for the reasons explained here.

Your deletions appear to be a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. The American Psychological Association has extensive documentation on their Wikipedia page about senior officials being ousted for many years of covering up their support for harming people behind their Code of Ethics. This led to major investigations of wrong-doing at APA, investigations by the US Senate and major newspapers such as The Washington Post, and changes to APA policies. But you seem to be trying to maintain the same coverup for CPA.

Instead of going to great lengths and further wrong-doing to cover up the questionable policies, why not just get CPA to correct the policy? CPA is not acting with integrity, or according to its own supposed core values. CPA never actually says that it has a policy protecting human rights in all circumstances. But the same as medical doctors and APA, if CPA wants to be a healthcare organization and not just a lobby group (and maintain public trust), it should get rid of this secret policy and the lies about its existance that are documented in Sections 1.1 - 1.5.

If you continue to cause disruption after being warned, you will be reported to the Wikipedia Administrator against vandalism, who will then decide whether to block your account. Even if you try to also hide this by deleting it like you did for Sections 1.1 - 1.5 on the CPA page, it will remain in your Talk History.

Warning Message: Conflict-of-Interest editing on Wikipedia CPA initially got their advertising person to secretly remove coverage of their dual conflicting policies about healthcare and harming people. Now more questionable behaviour, with a former CPA president attempting to anonymously delete the same documentation on CPA policies without explanation. A recent president of CPA has a Conflict of interest and should not edit or delete major controversies on their own group's page.

This is your chance to acknowledge your affiliation with CPA by replying here. Further deletions while having a Conflict of Interest will be reported to Wikipedia senior editors, and your account may be blocked.

Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, called promotional actions on Wipededia when you have a conflict of interest "ethical blindness". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict-of-interest_editing_on_Wikipedia#Bell_Pottinger Your attempt to cover up the well-documented history of CPA also warrants a complaint to your hospital (LHSC) and university (UW), if this continues. Ironically, the more you try to cover this up, the more attention you are giving it.

As noted previously though, instead of deleting other people's well-documented work, why not just add other history with citations if you want to create a more comprehensive history of CPA? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PsycProf (talk • contribs) 12:50, 20 June 2022 (UTC)