User talk:NiciVampireHeart/Archive 10

Newsletter
In this revision, you removed the fact that it confirmed Richards signing with the company and you left it as Stevie Richards appeared in a video promo with Abyss on the February 12 episode of Impact! [what does that say to the reader?]-- < TRU  CO  >  5 0 3 15:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well the least you could have done was reword it to state that it was his first appearance in TNA.-- < TRU  CO  >  5 0 3 20:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Its okay. We both have our opinions about the newsletter, but I think it would be best to go proofread it before sending it to Misza.-- < TRU  CO  >  5 0 3 20:45, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't insult your intelligence, I was stating it in general for both of us. So we can avoid errors like that in the future.-- < TRU  CO  >  5 0 3 21:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Re about jackass
I could tell you all my emotions but this page would be too long afterwards. I'll tell you in a reply to the e-mail. I just want you to see Abyss' sick promo. I've never loved tacks and glass more than at that moment. Good luck with Bob Holly.-- Will C  23:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * It might not be an amazing rant. I was expecting it so I'm not too pissed today. But it will be anti-Triple Cocksucker and Pro-Cena and Edge.-- Will C  01:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Just wait for the rant that will come when JBL or HBK ends Taker's streak.-- Will C  19:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * If anyone had too it should be Kane. No one else, because HBK has already been given alot of shit, he doesn't deserve to beat Taker's streak in my opinion.-- Will C  16:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, but look at Kane. He has tried twice before and lost. Kane is Taker's half-brother. It would make sense to have his kayfabe brother finally beat him, even when Taker said if he wanted anyone to end the streak it would be Kane.-- Will C  19:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * That can always change by next year. He just needs to be booked right.-- Will C  21:54, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I wish Jacobs owned the Kane gimmick so he could go to another promotion and actually get a deserved push.-- Will C  00:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm thinking more about Ring of Honor. They know how to push their talent. TNA has lost their way.-- Will C  01:20, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * More of a way too show that TNA lost their way from 05. 05 was their best year yet and have since gone downhill. They had nothing bad in 05. All their events were great. Just buy their Ultimate matches DVD, most of the matches are 04 to 06 era. Probably three at most from 07 to 08. I believe their is one Ultimate X match from 07 on there, as well as the 07 and 08 King of the Mountain matches. The DVD is 7 hours long with interviews and rules to each of the matches. Unbreable had their only 5 star match which is a must watch. Compared to all the matches TNA and WWE put on in 08, this one match was better than all of them. Bound for Glory was out of this world. Monster's Ball, the Iron Man match, the Ultimate X match, and the ending of the event were just great. I don't believe there was one bad match on the event. Many people have rated it a 9 out of ten.-- Will C  01:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

To know what I mean watch this: -- Will C  02:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I love the match just for the spot, in which Daniels flings AJ into Joe and AJ performs a hurricanrana. I mark out everytime I see that.-- Will C  20:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

You should watch most of the Ultimate X matches then. Namely the bout at Final Resolution (2005). That thing is insane. Or the Ultimate X Challenge match at Destination X (2005). That is probably my favorite Ultimate X of all time.-- Will C  20:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The Final Resolution bout is going to be easy to find. The DX bout I only watched because I got the Ultimate matches DVD. No bad matches on that entire DVD.-- Will C  20:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

It should be over there by now. It was released, I believe, in October. There is no match list on the DVD, so I'll tell you here. They begin with a few King of the Mountain matches, the 06 from Slammiversary (2006), the 2007 one from Slammiversary (2007), and the 2008 one from Slammiversary (2008). Then Ultimate X: the bout from Final Resolution (2005), the Destination X bout, the No Surrender (2006) bout for the Tag team belts, and the only one and first one to date to have them on the line, between Styles/Daniels and LAX. Another Ultimate X match is from Victory Road (2007) and is, the first ever and only one to date, Gauntlet Ultimate X match and has the Elevation X support instead of the ropes. They finish the first DVD with the Bound for Glory (2007) Ultimate X match. All those matches are great. The second DVD has Six Sides of Steel cage matches, Monster's Ball, Full Metal Mayhem, and a Ladder match. The cage matches are from Turning Point (2004), Lockdown (2005), and Lockdown (2006). The TP bout is the main event between AMW and XXX, in what is a bloody and just insane match. Just because of Elix Skipper's hurricanrana from the top of the cage. Then there is A.J. vs Abyss. If you love tacks and chairs, you'll love this match. The final one is for the NWA Title between Christian Cage and Abyss. Like before, if you love tacks, you'll love this match. Also hope you like chains, because there is a little surprise with one at the end of the match. Full Metal Mayhem is next, with a bout from Against All Odds (2005) between your favorite, Jeff Hardy, and yes, again, Abyss. Great match for the time given and made this match something in TNA. It was the debut of the match and only two have taken place since. Then another Full Metal Mayhem, and guess who is in this one. Abyss and Christian Cage for the NWA Title at Sacrifice (2006). Again tacks are involved. Now probably one of the best gimmick matches ever, the monster's ball. The 2005 and 06 bouts are included. They are from Bound for Glory (2005) and Bound for Glory (2006). They are amazing. Abyss is included in both so guess what, tacks are involved. Now the last match is a Ladder match between Christian Cage and Kaz from Genesis (2007). Amazing match. The entire DVD is worth the 20 bucks. You would be insane to not buy this DVD.-- Will C  21:24, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay.-- Will C  22:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Your Jeff Hardy image.
Yeah...even though he lost, you might want to put this image instead. ;) How's your "studying" going?  Simon KSK  01:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't know. It seems kinda wrong when you put a caption saying "Best WWE Champion," and he's wearing a Intercontinental title. Eh, whatever. So, how are are you doing. we haven't talked for a while.  Simon KSK  01:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Ric Flair
The title was just called the WWF Championship, not the WWF World Heavyweight Championship (although back when they were the WWF they would say the full name, like "World Wrestling Federation Championship" instead of just "WWF Championship").  TJ   Spyke   05:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 1998 is when they began calling it only that. Before that they would use both names (although they would rarely use the long name, I barely remember them ever using the full long name).  TJ   Spyke   15:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

WWE Alumni Page
Could you please, please, PLEASE, come back to the WWE alumni page! Moe changed everything that you did to the page, he published an unfinished wikitable and there is maybe half of the information on the page total. He deletes most of the comments made about the quality of the page. Your way was much better. I'm not saying this because I don't like change or anything. I'm saying this because I'm purely concerned about the quality of the article. Also, I'm new to this whole thing do you know how I could report him? Jcm431 (talk) 16:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Hey there, hope you could help me with something.

What would be considered reliable sources for wrestling articles? Nithas (talk) 20:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Jeff Hardy
Hey Nici, what's up? Listen, what would you think if this image of Jeff Hardy, was the main image in the article? Would it be cool with you or... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm very glad you liked the image. I'm very cool with the author of the image, hence why Randy Orton and Shawn Michaels got their main pics, and I told him that I would have a discussion with some people about the Jeff Hardy image, and since you like the image, I'll ask him permission so that the image can be used in his article. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I saw his picture of Jeff Hardy and I thought that would be a good image, but I thought it would be a good idea first to discuss it, you know. Until he gives the green light (permission), I'll upload the image and let you add the new picture to his article. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, cool. Again, I'm glad that you like it... you Jeff Hardy fan. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

No, why would I? Its just a request, no harm has been done. ;) Actually, the user says its fine that we use his images on Wikipedia. So, I'll ask him permission for those two images and we'll see what goes from there. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No its no bother at all. Also, you're just in luck, he gave the permission for the Jeff Hardy picture. Alright, I'll upload it at commons, give you filename, and let you do the honors in Jeff's page. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It wouldn't feel right; I would rather let you do it. :P --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm sure. Also, I've asked permission for the Natalya and Shane McMahon images, just need his approval. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * What Batman said in The Dark Knight, you don't need to thank me. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Image:Jeff Hardy SmackDown November 2008.jpg. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I got permission for both images, I'll upload them soon. Hey, I want your opinion on something. The user just suggested that I upload this image of the Undertaker. Do you think it might be a good image, meaning "main" image? P.S. I wanted to surprise you with this image, but the author of this image sadly doesn't have a contact link, so I can't get the image. :( --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's what I thought on the 'Taker image, I guess I'll have a talk with him. Maybe it can be put in a section or something. Also, he has offered to give permission on this image of Triple H, which is great, IMO. Totally, on the images of Shane and Natalya. Oh, I checked the user's contact (again) and he re-added his contact link, sent him a message regarding his pic of Jeff as WWE champ, so let's just see. Let's pray on this one. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Totally. Is the image of Jeff alright? Cause, I had a bit of trouble in cropping it and I want your opinion on it, if its good or not. Yeah, when I saw his WWE album, I was blown away, impressive skills. Oh, you should see his non-wrestling pics, impressive as well. Yeah, I'm crossing my fingers as well. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:35, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, just want to make sure. Is there any other picture(s) that you would like to see? The author of the Randy, HBK, and Jeff images. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You are going to love me FOREVER. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I know you do. I've uploaded the image and well I don't know where it would belong, so here ---> Image:Jeff Hardy WWE Champion Royal Rumble.jpg, another honor. Alright, I'll leave a message for Funaki, Layla, and Tazz. Its fine, he asked me to ask you guys, so its fine. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the barnstar, I really appreciate it, especially coming from you. ;) Nah, I won't move it, if I didn't know where it should go, then it wouldn't help if I moved it. In a while, I'll upload Shane, Natalya, and Triple H. Again, thanks for the barnstar. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:18, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, like I said, its no bother at all. I'm just trying to help the wrestling articles with excellent images. ;) I sent him the request of Funaki, Layla, and Tazz, let's see what he says. Thank you for the congrats, I appreciate it. I must confess that I'm done with writing PPV's, forever. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, its take too much out of you when researching for the feuds and writing the event. Its too much. Also, it drove me to the point where I had a hatred in writing them. Oh, I totally feel ya, bios are much easier to work on, then PPV's. Yeah, actor articles are better to research for, IMO. If you wanna help me out on working on a specific actor/actress, it would be an awesome collaboration. :P Thank you, I appreciate the congrats on her article. Also, you did help me out, during its FAC, with that sentence about her waitressing and stuff, again thanks for the sentence. Well, you and I had this deal that we would work on MVP's article, but we never got to it. Do you want to maybe get to it? Or another article. Before I forget, I give you props on fixing Hardcore Holly's article, its nicely written. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Awesome, look forward with working with ya tomorrow. Goodnight. P.S. Don't let the bed bugs bite. :P --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * So what section of MVP's article do you want to work on? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't mind and thank you for the compliment. ;) Also, I'm going slow on this, but I've uploaded the Shane and Triple H images. Later, I'll upload Natalya and Layla's images. Then later, I'll upload the rest of the images. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yup yup. Though, its a shame what happened to Shane last night. Bastard. Anyways, that's great, who knows we might get to submit to GAN today. :) Alright, I'll get to working in the lead, after I'm done, I'll have you check it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't know if punting people is entertaining. Maybe to you, but not me. ;) Anyways, I'll drop a note when I'm done. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I guess if you favor the "storyline". :) Wait, how 'bout HBK? Was he not entertaining last night? He was to me. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Hmmm, what would Jeff Hardy think of all this? Nici being entertained by a "bad boy". Joking aside, for the lead, do I use his ringname "MVP", ex: "MVP has wrestled for numerous promotions in his career" or his non-ringname, ---> "Burke has wrestled for numerous promotions in his career"? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I guess. But, who's the one that is totally "bad"? *cough* Orton *cough* Alright, I'll do that for his name and stuff. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:13, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Man, you just hatin' on Cena. ;) That's not true; before Kennedy when all soft, he was one of my favorite heels. Same thing with Orton, before he started punting people, he was one of my favorite, or should I say hot heel. Here's a good one; the Brian Kendrick, he's fantastic. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * See, I told you I have that "bad" side of me, too. Anyways, yeah its cool, I understand your boyfriend is more important, I know. :) The lead, do you want me to add all the promotions he was in before coming to WWE? Um, I'll try to find a date for DSW. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, cool. I just wondering that's why. Alright, I'll fix it and drop you a line. Finally, after a year, or so, we finally work on MVP's article. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I totally feel ya. Hey, what should our next project be? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Haha, no one can't resist saying that. Great choice, btw. Alright, after I'm done with fixing the lead, do you want to nominate it? --   ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Of course, when its set and done with. :) Alright, I think I got it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Would you mind if I archive his talkpage? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yup, two months. :P Hey, at least we have some time to fix it here and there. :) Alright, you want to do the same for Kennedy's? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:08, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Bye. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Do you still want to aim for a GT? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:53, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Its fine with me, I mean we are working on the projects that we want to do, so. I'll work on the leads for Morrison and the tag team page. Do you think you can handle fixing the info. in the articles? Also, reason I bring this up, the IP from Miz's page was blocked, so, no more interfering with the grammar changes and stuff. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yup, I know what you mean. ;) Alright, I'll do Morrison's lead first, then check in with you. Cool? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:19, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No worries, I'm in class right now, so I'm multi-tasking with Kennedy's article and class work. Also, I finished the lead for Morrison, can I have your thoughts. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:51, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Ooh, harsh criticism. :P Alright, I'll get to working on the stuff. Um, for the last bit, I think it works either way with "making" or "marking". But, I'll add your suggestion. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hahaha.... ha. I guess. Alright, after I'm done fixing it, I'll see which sentence makes sense with it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I fixed it; tell me if it works or not. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:34, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the compliment. :) Do you want me to add it to the article? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Will do. Hey, I was gonna tell you that I was reading through Morrison's article and there are a lot of POV stuff in there, you know. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:01, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I just wanted let you know, so. Yeah, I'll do it right now. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:37, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. After you're done with Morrison's article, can you do the same for Kennedy's? After its done. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:40, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, cool and thank you in advance. P.S. I finished the lead for Mr. Kennedy, again, can I get some criticism. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the copy-edit, I appreciate it. I'll get to fixing the lead info. for Kennedy. Yeah, the Miz's article is ready for nomination. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome; you ask, I deliver. :) I hope I didn't mess anything up. If I did, I'm sorry. Also, sorry I didn't log in yesterday, I was really busy at work. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:09, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Hell yeah, we do!!! Okay, thank God. Oh, I thought you probably did. I was panicking a bit with letting you down. But, if you didn't log in, then I'm calming down a bit. :) Alright, after I'm done with fixing the lead info., would Kennedy's article be ready for GA? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That's cool if we both feel the same way. Alright, give me a couple of minutes, I'll fix the lead and then nominate it. Alright, three down (MVP, The Miz, and Kennedy), two more to go (Morrison and tag team). ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * We sure are. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I gotta tell ya, coming up with a lead for a tag team is hard. But, I managed to write something up. Can I have your thoughts? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I feel your pain on that. ;) Have you thought of maybe checking out PW Torch or WrestleView for the results? Just a suggestion. Like above, I will work on the info. and check back with you. Yeah, the article is short and won't be that much of a problem. Hey, can you do a check on it afterwards? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I feel you on that, as well. :P Yup, you got it. Just drop me a note and I'll check it out. Um, I'm not sure about the spelling, but I got it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, we'll after you're done with Morrison's article, can you do the check, after you're done, don't want to stress you out between articles. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:14, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oakey dokey. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, just tell me when you're done with Morrison and I'll get to it. Oh, yeah I totally remember that. Their feud over the ECW title. I'll look up at some info. and add it, thanks for the notice. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yup. How should I start the sentence, though? Maybe ---> "Before they formed a partnership, Morrison and the Miz were once opponents, competing for the ECW Championship"? Again, I'm still new with working on tag teams. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Added bit --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Nice. Now, is it ready? Thank you for the congrats, 'preciate it. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, cool. How's Morrison's article coming along? Do you need help? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:30, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I totally feel you on that. Yeah, I'll check out the article and see what's "missing" and let you know. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Here's the stuff I found ---> In the Bischoff's assistant and apprentice section, "to drive the point home he began using the Nitro theme music as his ring entrance music", this is me, but shouldn't "music" be mentioned just once? In the MNM section, this sentence ---> "They held the titles for three months, having successful titles defenses against the teams Mysterio and Guerrero and Hardcore Holly and Charlie Haas", I feel that there's something missing between teams and Mysterio, again this is me, I may be wrong. That's it, I think the article is good to go. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Like you said, now we wait [for two months] for the articles to get reviewed. I'm proud that we actually got this done and stuff. This is probably our new year's resolution, in getting work done. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:06, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * We sure did. I do the same, because I'm required too. :) Heads up, I fixed the dead links for Unforgiven '06. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I saw the message you left at PW and I noticed that Unforgiven was listed, since I did expand it, I thought it was my duty to fix the dead refs. Also, I wound up fixing some dead refs. as well for other PPV's. I'll still continue with fixing them. Heads up, the stuff from WWE.com for Unforgiven '07, the results and stuff, have been deleted or something, cause the only result(s) there is the 'Taker and Mark Henry match. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:46, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You are welcome. Yeah, SumemrSlam '07, Unforgiven '07, and No Mercy '07 all have dead links, because of the events going and happening at Unforgiven, so. I'll still continue with fixing dead links for PPV's. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:11, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Maryse
Please do not revert edits saying that Maryse attacked Melina, that is a notable event and is the start of a fued. It doesn't matter, because it's not a week by week event. Josephjames21 (talk) 15:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * It's a feud that will happen I'm sorry but you can revert it if it's notable, Giving a DDT to the Women's Champion is pretty notable. Josephjames21 (talk) 16:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah still, that's a notable event, and she appeared on a different brand, that's quite notable! Josephjames21 (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I didn't mean it like that, this makes you look bad. I mean't Since I already know your opinion, I wanted to other people's opinions. Josephjames21 (talk) 16:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah well I asked you not to give your opinion, and I didn't give mine. So it makes you look bad, and that it is a notable event it makes you look bad. Josephjames21 (talk) 16:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I know you wanted to express your opinion, but I wanted a second opinon by someone who didn't know our opinion's. So I asked you not to express your opinion, as I didn't express mine. Josephjames21 (talk) 17:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: The Burchills
Yeah, I'll release the image for you. Mshake3 (talk) 17:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Subpage
Hi! You're probably the only user I've noticed so I'd like to ask you - how do I create a subpage to make an article on Leire Martínez? You can check th Spanish and French wikipedias to comprove her existingness. Thanks--Falegas (talk) 16:36, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot!--Falegas (talk) 16:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Hardy Boyz
Template:Hardy Boyz has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Black Manta 19:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry I thought I had put in my reason, i've added it in now. Black Manta 11:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Fix WM25
Tell them to fix WM25 saying that its the 25 WM not the 24  Supermike KSK  20:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

WM20 was really WM19 to you guys and WM1 was really WM0 to you people as well You know this is why you guys get in so much trouble  Supermike KSK  20:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

You are you guys are basically saying WM25 is WM24 which is not true its WM25 its been 25 since of WM25 of the event —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermike (talk • contribs) 15:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

See your porblem is your going by what Wikipedia is saying well its wrong WM25 mark 25 year of Wrestlemaina do rearch and go to WWE.com and guess what Im right It common sense I am its like saying your not 17 year old your really 16 because you birthday on a different day every year but that does not matter your still 17 rather it be on sunday or monday just like WM25 still 25 year of WM rather it be in March or April  Supermike KSK  20:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

LOOK! IT 25 WM ITS BEEN 25 YEAR OF THE EVENT 24 YEAR WAS LAST YEAR ITS NOT THAT HARD TO UNDERSTAND WHY ARE YOU BEING SO STUIPD THERE NOTHING 24 ABOUT THIS WM ITS ALL 25 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermike (talk • contribs) 15:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Cheezburgr


Pavlen666 haz givn u Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!

Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk puj with friendly messuj to all.

Bob Holly
I did a GA review on the article, and it's very close to passing. I left a few comments. There is some bad weather (rain/sleet/heavy snow) expected to come into my area for the next 48 hours, so I'll probably lose my Wi-Fi internet access to the tower a few km away. If you finish the article soon, I might not have internet access to be able to pass the article until Monday U.S time.  Royal broil  13:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, please let me know when you're done. I bet it'll take you just a few minutes. My internet is working right now and I hope to be on Wiki for about another hour. 13:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for all of your hard work on the article! I'll often review a professional wrestling article when I nom something I worked on. Most reviewers won't touch the topic. I don't mind reviewing them - I know the basics of wrestlers from the 1980s. I don't have enough knowledge, or the inclination, to work much on these articles. Cheers and congratulations on the green plus!  Royal broil  13:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

MVP GA Review
I just wanted to let you know that I've done the Montel Vontavious Porter review and put it on hold with a list of comments on the talk page. Just so that you know. MPJ-DK (talk) 19:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Nici, you're right about Wreslemania 25 not being the 25th anniversary. If people can not understand this, you're wasting your time trying to explain it to them. Certainly, it's not hard enough for you or I to understand (: 24.160.145.53 (talk) 06:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Face vs Fan Favorite
The term "Fan Favorite" implies popularity rather than their moral compass. Face is a much more accepted term, and I am setting the article back to say "face"

"It is often helpful to wikilink terms not obvious to most readers; sometimes links to Wiktionary may serve the reader as well as links to Wikipedia articles. Pay particular attention to terms for which the technical meaning is different from the commonly understood meaning" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.127.205.7 (talk • contribs) 04:53, March 9, 2009

Question
Not that it matters, but why do you capitalize links? For example, Professional wrestling match types and professional wrestling match types are the same thing. I know you don't edit an article just for that (you only do it when you are making other edits), I am just curious.  TJ   Spyke   20:20, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Feel free to continue doing it. I have no problem with it, I was just wondering.  TJ   Spyke   20:32, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Twinkle
Hi, What's twinkle? Thanks--Falegas (talk) 17:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, not that it matters, I was fiddling around at my preferences and I saw it. So you don´t know how to use it?--Falegas (talk) 14:44, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Not to matter. Thanks anyway!--Falegas (talk) 14:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

The intercontinental
Hey I was just reading your WWE page for the intercontinental title and I gotta tell you I'm kinda pissed JBL is the champ, even though he cheated by blinding CM Punk before close-lining him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Calebcass1 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

RE: Ashley
I was planning to finish and nominate the article at some point, so I have no problem doing it sooner than later. :) I'll finish it up in the next day or so and nominate it. Nikki ♥ 311 22:17, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't have much left to source, so I finished it up and nominated it. Nikki ♥ 311 20:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey
No I'm not back full time. I'm just sick and needed something to do than sleep all day so I've been more active recently. I wanted to know how you've been and congrats on Bob Holly? Also if you wanted to read a few comments from Youtube, in which I, in my opinion, completely own someone for being a down right idiot. It is funny.-- Will C  07:53, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I was waiting for you to say something but after a while I knew something was up. No, just got a head cold. I can't see that well because of the congestion but it will probably be gone in a few hours. It is probably one of those 24 hour bugs that turns into a 48 hour one. I stayed up for 31 hours last Tuesday, so I guess I was a little weak seeing I walked all over town since it was a nice day to keep me awake. I probably got sick then and it finally got bad Friday. The Irish have a language???!!! You learn something new everyday. Yesterday I found out Test was dead, which is so sad because I thought he had a chance at winning a world title in WWE one day and completing the Triple Crown and Grand Slam Championships, or going back to TNA one day. Now i have a future plan on working on his article for some reason. I need to quit making plans. I've already got this list to do. I didn't know you worked on those, I had a hunch but wasn't sure. I saw Thinkblue's name on them at GAN, so I wasn't positive. I doubt it will make you laugh, mainly just make you think I'm a dick, but this is what I say when a WWE mark or fanboy shows up on a TNA video. Search for two names: Tucanforpres001 (me) and mrskipper1234 (some idiot). It is a very long debate, or really me making him look like a jackass, and making myself seem like a prick.-- Will  C  10:37, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

I will, but then I'll be gone from here once again. Hey, I'm part English, you just called me a bastard. I am but still, thanks for the compliment. lol I can't even read that. Yeah he is a troll. He has joined every bandwagon out there. Plus I left a comment on his channel to get inside his head. He removed it and blocked me. Then left two on my channel so I couldn't reply. They are still on my channel because I don't give a shit. It was so easy to get inside his head. I knew exactly what to say so he would reply the way I wanted. When he started copying my comments I knew just to say he lost and he would defend himself like a little child, as if winning and losing meant something on the internet. Unless you are playing a online game for money it means nothing. He couldn't even spell, that is what made it so much fun. The funny thing is, I see more WWE fanboys saying TNA sucks than TNA Fanboys saying WWE sucks. It is really sad, not that TNA is all powerful, I'm starting to lose hope for them. Though Destination X (2009) looks good but still, Lockdown (2009) looks decent at best so far. Hopefully we can find hope elsewhere.-- Will C  11:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Supermike is just trying to get his way. He should open his eyes and look at the evidence. Interesting, I don't know why he would think that there is only one good match. I own Bound for Glory (2007) on DVD and Sting and Angle had a pretty good match. It will be at least a three star match. Booker T vs AJ is a dream match. I've been waiting for their PPV match since Booker debuted in TNA at Genesis 07 to a mega pop (look it up). I even had that booked in my head for Against All Odds 09, TNA just waited a month later than me. Joe and Steiner had an amazing match at Slammiversary (2006) from what I've been told. They should have at least a three star match since they've yet to have a bad one. Ultimate X will be amazing if given enough time. The 6 woman tag team match should be decent, around 2 stars while the knockouts title will be lucky to get a 1 star. The Tag title match will be great considering there are two of the best teams in wrestling going at it. Beer Money was a great idea by TNA, too bad they stole it from me when I came up with the idea to have Roode and Storm as a tag team in January 08. Match of 10,000 tacks is rare and Abyss is in there. It will be a good to great match, as long as Morgan is willing to take a few bumps. I see about 6 out of the 8 matches being good to great. While just two duds that might not be duds. Plus a Mick Foley or Sting turn which we all see coming.-- Will C  00:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

First, change it back, second, I haven't seen it but people say it was terrible to bad to decent to good. I feel it will be good since alot of people seem to get caught up in the moment. I really like the new Joe killed Steiner storyline though.-- Will C  12:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No offense, but I don't like it. The hearts, red, and purple are so much better. Joe and Steiner went to a DQ about two minutes in, from what I've read and been told, after Joe attacked the ref. Joe then saw Steiner celebrating his win outside the ring, and went to kick his ass. He chased and beat the shit out of him through the crowd all the way outside the arena. Later, after AJ became the first to win all of TNA's belts besides the new world one, they showed Joe covered in blood. He was walking into the arena with his knife covered in blood and saying Steiner will never be the same or he'll never be here again. The thing being he supposedly killed Steiner. I guess TNA is taking my advice and taking the saying "Joe's gonna kill you" literally.-- Will C  13:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Well JakeDHS07 really liked it. He was marking out on IM. He is more of a WWE fan. So if he liked it when I believe he is 20 and thought it was one of the greatest things he has seen, I believe it was done well. I was told it had a weird feeling to it. Like Joe has lost his mind. Steiner was busted open in a two minute match, so they are pushing a more darker Joe like I wanted. Problem is, Joe is fatter and bald now.-- Will C  13:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Me as well, but the thought of such a gimmick makes me happy they are trying new things.-- Will C  13:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Not as much this time. Right now I'm finishing User:Wrestlinglover/Final Resolution (2005) and User:Wrestlinglover/Against All Odds (2005). Plus User:Wrestlinglover/List of TNA X Division Champions. Then I'll be gone. Just get on once a day to check the reviews.-- Will C  17:50, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh, I love you too lol. Hey, I have to do something to keep me sane. I stayed up all night again. Probably going to sleep in a bit though. Also, I'm in the wiki cup and I want to win and Final Resolution, Against All Odds, and List of TNA X Division Champions have been on my mind for a while now. It is about time I get them done.-- Will C --- (What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 18:32, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Matt Sydal / Evan Bourne
Hi. I saw you have recently reverted changes to the article Matt Sydal that had stated he was better known as Evan Bourne. Without a doubt he is now better known as Evan Bourne and now that he is fairly established in the WWE the article should probably be moved. I have edited the article to now state that he is better known as Evan Bourne. JimRDJones (talk) 01:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Adam Copeland: Sharpshooter / Edgecator
Hi. While it is true that the Edgecator is a modified Sharpshooter and what Edge is noted for performing, I made the edit on the basis that for 2 productions this past month he has performed a standard Sharpshooter as a finishing Submission Manuever. For example, as seen just this past edition of Smackdown: YouTube ⒺⓋⒾ ⓁⒼⓄ ⒽⒶⓃ ②  talk 05:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

hi
but his middle name is planted in the infobox? 70.165.70.234 (talk) 03:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: One down
Awesome, good job on the review, and sorry I wasn't there to help, was busy. Hey, Mr. Kennedy has a "under review" at GAN, so luckily that can be the second one down. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the late reply, I've been busy, here and not here. Well, you know, I still feel bad that I didn't help, so I haven't given myself any credit, doesn't feel right. I promise I won't let you do all the work for Kennedy's review, I promise I'll help out. Though, if you beat me to it, then, damn it, you beat to it. Also, I forgot to say this, congrats on Bob Holly passing GA, good job. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:17, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I'll just say that I "co-helped" in getting the article to its status; partial credit should work, I guess. ;) Thank you for giving me some of the work on the review, I appreciate it, and no this isn't sarcasm, I really do appreciate and I don't mind. Same here, I was bored yesterday and didn't know what to do. I'm guessing it had to do with the exams that I took. I hate exam season, takes a lot out of you. You should be pleased, you deserve all the praise you receive, its very good. :P --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:52, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, who would of thought that exams were going to be a big hit in college. The things I do to have a great future. Sarcasm. Anyways, I didn't spot that about the heel thing, must've missed it. If Royal brings it up, I'll fix it, so don't worry about it. Hey, you do a lot of work here and you should earn those "breaks" or "off time", cause you need them, IMV (In my view). I understand those lazy days, I've had them, and it doesn't hurt you to have them, so its understandable. Also, this happens to be the reason where I felt bad about letting you do the MVP review by yourself, cause your so busy and stuff. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * So do I, one of the common things we share, having the lazy days. :) Okay, I'll drop the whole MVP thing, I just wanted to plead my case and I think its starting to bother the hell out you, so I'm stopping. Well, not everything can be easy, even if you want it or not. Hope that made sense. Agreed, Wikipedia is part of my life as well, but there's a point when a break is needed. Exactly, it is devastating that people would decide to vandalize, when in fact they have nothing better to do, but that. Indeed it is sad, but not you. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This happens to be one of my "out of it" days, bare with me, on making sense. Yes, thank God for Twinkle, Huggle, Rollback, etc., to help out in reverting the stuff, because it is mad. Do they think they can get away with it? They must be pretty dumb not to think that someone is going to undue their edits, but what am I saying, these people don't think at all. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

I know, some of the insults, some of them, are pretty harsh and they really cross the line, IMO. I know, sometimes its very hard to understand why this even happens, but it happens. Exactly, they say negative things, but once they've gotten to know them, then they change their opinion about that individual. Hypocrisy, is what comes to mind. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:31, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's our light of day, seeing them getting blocked forever. ;) Afterwards, new people come along and we got to deal with them. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:15, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yup, that's basically our wiki story. :) Hey, I was wondering, whatever outcome of the articles are, hopefully they are good, do you want to see if we can get London and Kendrick to GT? That's if you're not busy with school or stuff. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:27, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * After the "somewhat" experience from John Morrison and The Miz, I think I might be able to work on London and Kendrick's tag team page, so that would be one down. Yeah, we can start this now, so we can have it done and not worry about it. Like you said, the articles won't get reviewed for at least two months, so that gives you time to study for your exams and when you come back, the articles are getting reviewed... or not. Yeah, we should definitely tell Nikki about this, do you want to tell her? I haven't talked to her for a while. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool, I'll begin working on the lead. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Excellent. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:06, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Congrats. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:47, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I saw that she nominated the article yesterday. Um, I worked on the lead on Friday, but its a bit short, I do want your opinion if anything else is needed. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Damn, I forgot that they won the World tag team titles, and didn't include it. Nervous laugh. Alright, I added the suggested info., tell me what you think. P.S. Nice signature. :P --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:09, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oops, I fixed it. How 'bout now? Its early, but who cares, I don't care, and nobody should. :) Alright, you wanna split the work in the tag page? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, cool. Hahahaha, nice, I would have never thought of that. ;) Do you want to split sections, so it can be much easier or... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I am a sarcastic person, but that never came to mind. Anyways, I'll work on the SmackDown section and you can take the Raw one. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Tight. Question: Is it necessary to keep that London and Kenrick surpassed MNM's title reign... days? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I was wondering if it was notable enough to keep, but I found some sources and added it to the statements, so. I know its none of my business, but I gotta ask, did you have [fun] yesterday? Was there a whole lot of partying? :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Nice, I know you guys throw some crazy parties, so I was just wondering if it was fun and all. :) Wish I was there. Its cool, I didn't start working on it until like three days later after we agreed to work on it. Its fine, no need to apologize, we're both busy. :P If you do have time, can you copy-edit the article and see if its GA material? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool. BTW, excellent idea including an aftermath section, it never popped in my head, so props. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, that's smart thinking, keep it up. ;) You know I wonder, if Morrison and the Miz were to pass everything, could Morrison be featured in two GT's? Meaning, if MNM were elevated to GT. I hope that made sense. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:57, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Awesome, I'll nominate it and I its cool, cause I know you're one of the main contributors and stuff, wouldn't want to "disturb" anything. If that's the case, I think this would be a great future project. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:20, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Has been nominated, again, I hope its cool. Oh, don't forget that your the second contributor for Morrison's. Still counts. :) Do you think this might be a good project to work on now or in the future? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Again, I hope its cool. Yeah, I was checking, and there you were. Yeah, I was just wondering, since we did pull of London and Kendrick's article fast. :) I understand, I got some exams as well, so its fine. Like I said, I was just wondering. In the mere future, we can definitely work on it. This could be one of our many collaborations, since we do work great together. :P --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Great, I'll do the same. Don't worry, I won't be too "busy" not to work with you. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Same here. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Kicking your ass
I'm kicking your ass and I'm semi-retired lol WP:PW.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 13:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * In-case you have no idea what I'm talking about, I have an article on FLC and 3 on GAN. I might have one on FAC that is since I stayed up all night again and I'm bored at the moment.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 13:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

I know, it was pointless and out of the blue (I think that is the way you spell it in this situation) but I'm bored and easily amused, plus I keep changing what I'm doing left and right. Talking to you clams me. Also, you and me have a weird thing were we always have articles on GAN at the sametime and kind of have a war at who can have more articles on GAN (or am I just making that up in my head).-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 13:41, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * You bitch! I have you on FAs though with one. Plus not for long will you be ahead of me on GAs. I have three at the moment on GAN, and soon they will make it 7 (also if you do the math, I have Slammiversary 08, Hard Justice 08, No Surrender 08, Sacrifice 08, Victory Road 04, and also, technically, Lockdown 08). Then I'll finish a shitload (Is that one word, oh fuck it, I'm a redneck, we make new words) more PPVs, and AJ with you and Joe by myself probably unless you help there as well, then I'll have you. Beat that cracka.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 13:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

That is weak, I'll have way more than you think. Check this right here. Everyone of those will be GA or FA by September of this year, unless it is impossible to get a certain article to that level. Also around four to ten good/featured topics. You'll seem like a newbie when I'm done. You'll be as pathetic as I was when I started this and created this.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 14:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Sounds good, but I must state that there should be a rule, that if I don't get all articles to a higher status, instead someone beats me to it, like maybe your little brother, whom I've already met on a Beer Money article, that it doesn't count. Like I'll take AJ to GA, but Joe is taken by someone else, which I had no power there, but I got the rest finished, I still win. Now what do you get if I fail? Also, seeing your birthday is July 10, 91, I'm only about 1 month and 9 days younger than you. Interesting, or at least I think so. Plus to give you a link to my accomplishments article next time you won't be WRONG!! here: User:Wrestlinglover/Awards and Accomplishments.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 14:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, but one day we are going to meet and I'm going to be taller and look older. I went to a few football games (Soccer to you) last year and one dude thought I was 30. Another said 23, and another said 25. A friend thought I was 21, though he had only known me for about two weeks. I'll make a list of all the articles that I have subpages for and add a few more located on my to do list. It will be located at User:Wrestlinglover/Sandbox with my other to do list. I'll keep track and come September 18, 2009, you'll have a banner on your page. Also nice quotes, they were an interesting read, my favorite was "I think animal testing is cruel. They get nervous and get all the answers wrong". I'm sure we'll get along fine, but I'll probably find you more interesting since we have both lost our minds.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 15:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * If you look good in a low-cut top I won't care who looks older (hey, I'm a guy, you are a girl, I don't care if we are friends, my head goes to the gutter all the time, even with people I've known since birth I'm like that). This is what I currently look like, at 3 am, . Oh, I don't talk I act, like Samoa Joe at a buffet on Sunday night, he doesn't give a shit, he'll kill you to get to the chicken, that is why the fans chant Joes is gonna Kill you. Though they will probably soon change it to Joes gonna eat you. Never heard of it or know what it is, will look it up one day.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 16:14, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I'm coming to Ireland then, real soon. Now say I look pretty, even though I look like I'm about to take your soul in that picture. I wasn't in a great mood at that moment. Bullet wanted me to take a picture of myself so he could finally see what I look like. Plus, I look good in anything, no that is a lie. But remember, I have a good sense of humor and can make you laugh, isn't that what really counts? No, I'm rather good looking, but I'm also a prick at times. (And that is the gospel according to the Fallen Angel; I just wanted to say that) I will.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 16:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, give me a few more months and I'll look like I was going too before I got sidetracked: example (not the face but, and I'm confortable with my sexulaity, the body. I quit weightlifting a few months back so it will easy to get that once I get back into my routine). Millionaire is a few years down the road, then Billionaire, and finally Trillionaire. Sorry, I let the demon take over. Won't happen again, but just for the fun of it...FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK. Hey, you are the one who has this userbox.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 16:54, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Also, you spelling was dumb haha. Sorry, just had to make the edit. Saw your mistake and went for it. I'm looking for stuff to edit.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 17:04, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 17:23, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I forgot to mention the table of contents for our deal (our mine with the devil *u*). The link is here: User:Wrestlinglover/Sandbox. Look through that and if there is any you think should be removed, go right ahead. The rules are I must have all those finished by September to either GA or FA. That if someone finishes one before me, that it is removed from the list since I had no power over that and it is stricken from the record. Also, if an article is not notable or can not be sourced so there is no possible way it can be a GA or FA, then it doesn't count towards the deal. Sound good?-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 19:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, are we talking begining of September or end? I much rather perfer the later so I have articles for September's Wikicup if I'm still in it then.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 23:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Great, let my final battle begin (I hope you liked the section name, I was trying to be a smart ass). Also, just to tell you, all those listed did not have subpages. I believe I have around 60 subpages. I listed 130. I added my to do list into it. You now, if I win this, I'll have done what you asked twice. I already have people to work with me on AJ (you), Christian Cage (Think), Gail Kim, Awesome Kong, Christy Hemme, Ms. Jackie, and others (Nikki). I'm looking good so far.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 00:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, then they'll be glad. I'm going to start reviewing GAs. I was going to review The Miz for you, but then again I must leave. Though, I would expect you would want someone else to review it not from the project. Even though, I'll probably be more harder than someone not from the project. I know what is reliable and what isn't. Plus would understand if you got anything explained wrong or explained in too much detail. I'll be centered around the sports section. To make sure that gets lower so we have more reviews for wrestling articles quicker. I'm tired of waiting a month for a review. Good I got my job done. I've proven people wrong before.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 00:14, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't give a fuck who reviews mine. I mean it, I don't give a fuck, I need all I can get. Nikki reviewed two of mine. I didn't care. Wrestling fans are going to read them, why not have wrestling fans review them. That way, we know they make sense. I can't stand having to explain wrestling to someone who doesn't know what a headlock or a turnbuckle is. We'll see, we'll see, WillC, we will C, we will see.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 00:22, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * You want me to quit cussing completely, just say so then. Well I understand about jobber, face, and heel. That is if they didn't read the pages. But you think about it, if you were more interested in science and never watched or even cared about wrestling, wouldn't you wonder what a heel, face, and jobber were when you finally saw the entertainment value in it and got a little interested. Then it got bigger when you dated or married someone dealy in-love with it. You would read a wrestling bio or PPV that was a start class, and saw jobber, face, heel, etc written out. You would have to click the links. But if the links weren't there, you would have no ways of understanding it. The out of universe format helps in ways. I don't like explaining the moves, but helping explain the lingo, is fine with me. Finally someone understands my fucking sig (I did it to piss you off). I came up with it when I said my name over and over one day. William Chaudoin, Will Chaudoin, William C, Will C, wait a minute.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 00:50, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

No one has said anything, so I don't know. I'm wondering if people get the recent addition. No wonder you and me get along, you and me are the same.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 01:50, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * It is amazing. It ends with these very words: "What the Fuck have you done lately?!" You might have to, just so I can see you explain it.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 02:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Never trust reviews. I don't trust Destination X reviews. It was probably be a decent event. The ODB segment probably pissed people off while they watched it. Okay, I'm game. I want to see how you'll pull this one out, I'm a pervert, get over it. I'm a guy, we are all like that.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 02:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I own it and love it. Morgan Freemen says Fuck in such a cool way. No matter how you say it, you are still looking at naked pictures.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 02:45, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey, porn can be tasteful as well. How did we get to discussing porn? This is interesting.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 03:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, I'm weird. Rarely a girl will be like whatever, they'll be like, pervert *slap* *walks away*.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 03:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

I can get worse but I don't want to get banned. I don't know, don't you irish have special powers.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 03:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Too bad, but that was a really good joke wasn't it.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 03:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey, I didn't even plan on saying that. It just happened. I then ran with it. Bullet loves it.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 04:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

I told him what I wrote and he laughed.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 04:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem, I'm sitting talking to him over IM. He keeps calling me gay and hopeless with girls, in a way. I'm saying he can't cut a promo. We bitch. It is fun.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 04:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

You should get Yahoo IM. It is faster than this.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 04:41, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

I do as well. I'm wmhc818. I'm talking to Bullet on it.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 04:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, I'm gone from here then.-- Will C --- (<font color="Black">What the F*** have you done lately???!! ) 05:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Get on Windows IM so I have someone to talk to at 8 am. I'm pathetic, I know.-- Will C --- <font color="Black">Joe's gonna kill you!!! ) 12:13, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Lesnar
Hi, do the Mugshots.com-ref at Brock Lesnar serve some purpose I might be missing? The only think I can think of is that the article once said "Brock Edward Lesnar" - to which I guess a source is needed - but looking at Mugshots.com now that doesn't seem to be it... Any idea what's up? Cheers, -- aktsu (t / c) 10:52, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, just figured I should ask seeing as it's been there (at least) since the article was promoted to GA back in May 2008... IMDB.com was the best source a quick search turned up for "Edward" so I'll just re-add it and replace the ref. -- aktsu (t / c) 11:02, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Kennedy's Mic Check
My bad. PCE (Talk)
 * Thanks for the head's up. PCE (Talk) — Preceding undated comment added 05:45, March 24, 2009