User talk:NiciVampireHeart/Archive 17

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:48, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem

 * File:Lacy Von Erich by KnightNephrite.jpg
 * File:Kicked out of the club by KnightNephrite.jpg
 * File:TBP at full strength by KnightNephrite.jpg
 * File:The ultimate hair cut by KnightNephrite.jpg
 * File:Madison apologizes by KnightNephrite.jpg
 * File:Back at full power TBP by KnightNephrite.jpg

The owner of the images emailed permissions-en@wikimedia.org with this message:

''I hereby affirm that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of File:Kicked out of the club by KnightNephrite.jpg, File:TBP at full strength by KnightNephrite.jpg, File:The ultimate hair cut by KnightNephrite.jpg, File:Madison apologizes by KnightNephrite.jpg, File:Back at full power TBP by KnightNephrite.jpg, File:Lacy Von Erich by KnightNephrite.jpg

I agree to publish that work under the free license CC-BY-SA version 3.0.

I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Dennis Gates Jr Photographer / Copyright holder October 11, 2009''

'''Is there any other information you need? The files still say "This image or media is missing evidence of permission."''' StarEnerg (talk) 19:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

I was wondering how the above images can be added to commons? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:The_Beautiful_People_(professional_wrestling) —Preceding unsigned comment added by StarEnerg (talk • contribs) 19:12, October 21, 2009


 * http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Gallery.php?wikifam=commons.wikimedia.org&img_user_text=KnightNephrite
 * These images were uploaded and I was wondering if you can move them to commons like you did the previous ones?StarEnerg (talk) 19:19, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

2010 WikiCup Signups Reconfirmation! (reminder)
To ensure that everyone who signed up is still committed to participating in the 2010 WikiCup, it is required that you remove your name from this list! By removing your name, you are not removing yourself from the WikiCup. This is simply a way for the judges to take note of who has not yet reconfirmed their participation. If you have not removed your name from that list by December 30th, 2009 (by 23:59 (UTC)) then your name will be removed from the WikiCup. Note: this is the same message from last week, but you are receiving it because you have not removed your name from the list yet! Please do so if you still plan on participating.  iMatthew  talk  at 22:22, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 16:12, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Help with photos
Hi, Nici. Its me. I need that you help me, because y have upload a lot pf photos, like hulkmania, raw & wcw, but I don't know if i have put in the correcct place of the article. Also, I have upload a photos with a fan and she tell me that she wnat that I will use the original photos, no a cropped version. Can you see my edition.s? Thanks. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:11, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi. Thanks for your help. Normaly, I onl put the photo and you, the rest of the people, choose the text and the place. Also, I have upload the following photos: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Boomboom.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lis,nik,kid.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lisa%26Juav.jpg I need help. The first, I think that is Rey Mysterio unmasked. The second, I don't know who is the wrestler, but the anem is kid, so i think that is Blly Kidman. And the final photo i have no idea about who is the wrestler. Also, I tell the photographer that change the licence of a chris benoit phot. Thanks.  --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Final Battle 2009
ROH (and other wrestling sites) frequently include nicknames in the results section, that doesn't make it part of their ring name. That is the case here, their ring names are just Andy Ridge and Alex Payne, the other stuff is just their nick names.  TJ   Spyke   01:53, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:23, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Hoping you can explain something to me regarding an article.
I was reading Santino Marella's article and noticed that there is a non wiki hyperlink on the page. I wrote the following on the talk page for the article:

In the first paragraph of Santino's page, the word classes in the first sentence has a hyperlink to some sort of gaming website. It is not a standard Wiki link to another page and I have never seen it before in any articles. It appears to be a form of advertising and from my understanding that is against Wiki policy. I tried to remove it and replace the wording but it did not take and the link is still there. It is highlighted by a double underlined green line. If someone can either fix it or explain why it is allowed that would be helpful, because as I said before, I do not think that it belongs in the article. Drunknesmonsta (talk) 20:25, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

It appears to be some sort of advertisement for a gaming webiste or something like that. I tried to remove the wording and replace it but it did not work. You've always been helpful to me so I figured you may be able to take care of it or explain to me how to change it. I thought it was against wiki policy to have hyperlinks like that on the site. Please take a look and let me know. It would be much appreciated. Drunknesmonsta (talk) 20:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!!
  

 Set Sail  For The   Seven Seas    359° 0' 15" NET    23:56, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Re, Re Marella
Hey, Merry Christmas to you as well! It's weird, I initially saw it on the computer im currently using, but so I thought that it was maybe something this this PC. Then I saw the same thing on a friends computer too. It didn't just appear on Santino's page, it was on some other pages as well. It was one of those hyperlinks that you see on some sites where it will highlight a certain word, for example wrestling, and then have a little pop up attached dispalying info on a certain website that sells something wrestling related,as long as your mouse is highlighting the particular word. I figured I'd as someone that I kind of talk to on here since you have been very helpful with things. I didn't know if anyone else had seen anything similar. I appreciate you getting back to me about it. There was another thing I was wondering if you could help meout with. An article on an X-Men charcter named Cable has been pretty much reduced to nothing. According to Cameron Scott, it's becuase it does not fit Wiki's current format polices, and I understand that, but there are other articles that do not fit and yet they are being worked on over time. Now there is nothing left but fairly useless info. on the character. My question is, is there a way to recover the article that had all of his fictional biography so that I could personally work on it before reposting it? A lot of the info in the original article was fairly well written, it just needed to be taken out of the in universe style. I know this is a long ass question and response...lol...so if you do have a chance to get back to me or maybe if you could check it out yourself, that would be much appreciated. Thanks again for your time Nikki! Drunknesmonsta (talk) 23:49, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Cable (comics)
I saw that you got back to me. I've looked at somerevisions of the page, but I can't seem to find the one that had all the information. I'm gonna do somemore digging around in the next couple of weeks. I saw the sandbox you had set up for me, thanks for putting the link tomy sandbox in, cause i had no idea how to access it. I am having trouble creating the info box..just don't know how to do it. well drop me a linke when you get a chance and you can possibly help me out with that. thanks, sorry my keabord sucks and my keys are sticking like it's going out of style. Drunknesmonsta (talk) 00:29, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

"The" situation
Then explain why John Morrison's WWE bio reads his neckbreaker as "The" Moonlight Drive, but his article on Wiki denotes the "The". The same is seen with several other articles. PCE (talk) 06:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm glad you're taking measures to tend to the articles missing the "The" in the finishing moves area, considering no one else, be it a random user or anyone from that Project, has even bothered to revert articles that are in similar situations to Morrison's. However, because "The" is added on to Moonlight Drive, that means that the move would have to be moved down below the Nitro Blast, the standing SSP and the Starship Pain due to alphabetical listing. PCE (talk) 20:21, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Then what's the point of including the "The" if it's not even going to be placed in alphabetical order? PCE (talk) 20:46, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not talking about all of that. I can understand placing "The" before the move name due to an official source, but due to the source saying the move's whole name as "The Moonlight Drive" instead of simply saying the "Moonlight Drive", that would indicate that the move's name begins with the T in The, which would mean that it should be in alphabetical order under moves beginning with the letter S. PCE (talk) 21:00, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Then enjoy having finishing and signatures moves with sloppy looking alphabetical ordering. PCE (talk) 21:08, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Albeit with sloppy alphabetical listing that came about from a technicality. PCE (talk) 21:16, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree. Encyclopedias should have reliable and verifiable material, but if it means ignoring alphabetical, chronological and other such essential listings, then it just goes to show that order doesn't truly mean anything to those that tend to such encyclopedias. PCE (talk) 21:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Alt text
Thanks for the link to that page, I didn't even know there was a page about alt text use. I've been going by the rule of most celebrity pages where they seem to go with the 'Jane Doe at Anytown, USA's Dog Walking Event on (day).' in the alt text (and many pages ignore it completely), so it's good that there's a guideline for it. My apologies for mistaking the intent of it.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:25, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

The 2010 WikiCup begins tomorrow!
Welcome to the biggest WikiCup Wikipedia has yet seen! Round one will take place over two months, and finish on February 26. There is only one pool, and the top 64 will progress. The competition will be tough, as more than half of the current competitors will not make it to round 2. Details about scoring have been finalized and are explained at WikiCup/Scoring. Please make sure you're familiar with the scoring rules, because any submissions made that violate these rules will be removed. Like always, the judges can be reached through the WikiCup talk pages, on their talk page, or over IRC with any issues concerning anything tied to the Cup. We will keep in contact with you via weekly newsletters; if you do not want to receive them, please remove yourself from the list here. Conversely, if a non-WikiCup participant wishes to receive the newsletters, they may add themselves to that list. Well, enough talk- get writing! Your submission's page is located here. Details on how to submit your content is located here, so be sure to check that out! Once content has been recognized, it can be added to your submissions page, from which our bot will update the main score table. Remember that only articles worked on and nominated during the competition are eligible for points. Have fun, and good luck! Garden, iMatthew, J Milburn, and The ed17 19:21, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Cody Rhodes
Cody Rhodes' Cross Rhodes finisher is a Rolling Cutter, not a Spinning Facebuster. Read the description of both of the moves. The source says it is a "spinning facebuster" but the source is incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dragonslayer619 (talk • contribs) 07:30, January 2, 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 08:59, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi
Happy New Year Nici, it has been a while but thought to drop by an say hi and happy new year. Bye!-- Will C  09:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Same to you. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 12:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, hey what do you think of noting the Impact! vs Raw issue that happens tomorrow in the newest newsletter? Big event, I think it needs noting in the news section.-- Will C  17:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, meant to respond sooner, but it slipped my mind. Yes, definetly, and it obviously aready has been. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 15:05, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Andrew Trimble

 * moved from user talk ikip

Hey, I noticed you moved Andrew Trimble to Article Incubator/Unreferenced BLPs/Australia/Andrew Trimble. First, thanks for incubating the article instead of deleting it, and I hope to reference it if I get some time, but I was wondering why you placed him under Australia? He's an Irish rugby player, not an Australian one. I'm unsure of how the article incubator works, so I was hoping you could remedy this. Thanks, ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 11:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * NiciVampireHeart, first of all, thank you for catching this mistake, and your diligence in catching this mistake. Second of all I am sorry for the page move and any inconvenience I may have caused you.
 * The list was provided by a member of Wikiproject Australia: Article_Incubator/Unreferenced_BLPs/Australia. I simply copied and pasted the name. I will address this right now. Again, my apologies. Thank you for your understanding and patience.
 * Your comments lead me to believe you are aware of the current BLP blowup, background: Requests_for_comment/Biographies_of_living_people Ikip 11:43, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not a problem - I was pretty confused, but that would explain it. Thank you for fixing it. I'll attempt to reference it sometime today, there's a wealth of references available.
 * Indeed, I am aware of the situation, but I choose not to involve myself with the drama and stupidity that tends to compromise AN, ANI, and RFC. Thanks again, ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 11:47, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. The way you handled the situation was incredible, you could be a diplomat.
 * I hate getting involved in the drama, but I feel like I am the only person standing between 50,000 articles being deleted. I wish you could take a moment to comment. So many editors and projects (WP:Wikiproject Australia, WP:Incubator, WP:Article Rescue Squadron), are working so hard to save the salvageable 50,000 articles, I am so grateful. Ikip 11:54, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you, but I feel you're exaggerating. :)
 * I will take a look at the RfC, but I am not guaranteeing contributing. If you come across any Irish or pro wrestling articles up for deletion, feel free to let me know, and I'll see if I can salvage them. Thanks, ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 12:19, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 04:18, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Improved
The new and Improved section. :) It was. I kinda wanted to archive my talkpage. Just by looking at him, he looks amazing, I'm sure his wrestling skills are... wait for it... awesome. ;) That "vampire" image looks weird. You should ask, you never know. It would be a good addition... just ask. P.S. The lead is done. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  21:49, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Really? No wonder. He's great because of his former trainer. :) No biggie, I'm sure he's great. I'll have to check a couple of his matches. Speaking of matches/HBK, the WWE is gonna release a DVD of HBK's 25 greatest matches, look at me, I'm advertising. :) Nice. His sister made him shave it off, that's so funny. Alright, I got your concerns, can you give a second look? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  22:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No need to be sorry, I too been busy with school... and studying. :( Yeah, I have my exams coming up, too. About the "former trainer"? Yeah, those two matches definitely will be included. I hope the Iron match is included (one of my favorite matches). I'll definitely get it. :) Cool, I fixed your concern, and added the lead to the article. No problem, that's the only thing I could get. So, are you "happy" that the Irish dude is champion? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I bet you that you are exhausted, I know I have when I've taken two exams in one day. It hurts my brain. :( So, do you what I'm gonna say. ;) I just go and rent the PPV's I missed or whatever DVD is coming out. Agreed, the Montreal match was not even memorable, except for what happened at the end. I'm surprised about the way the GTC is going; usually, there's a lot of people praising us about the work we did. Right? I didn't even buy PPV, but late at night I checked the results, and was shocked. I can't believe they gave him the title. I'm not liking this trend of giving the title to a newcomer in their debut year (Swagger got the ECW title, the Irish dude, and there's someone else). Cena will probably get the title back at the Royal Rumble. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  20:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, hopefully you're not still stressed. No, can't say that I watched it. I was watching an American football game between the Saints and Cowboys, and I didn't like the outcome of it. Really? I'm a have to watch what you watch. :) Yeah, maybe you're right. We sure did impress them when we had two at the same time or something. But, yeah, the timing was off for us. I agree, no way will he have a long title reign. TBH, I think Edge will pull a Cena. Rumors say he comes back at RR, and as we know Edge, he'll have a surprise for all of us. Who knows, maybe Ted or Cody win it... you never know. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  16:37, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Glad to hear that. :) Nothings wrong with American football, it's a great sport, I enjoy it. I'm a have to see this PPV to see what you is talking about. ;) True, but I have that gut feeling Edge might do that. I didn't expect him at Survivor Series in '07 and '08, so. Really, you knew Orton was gonna win? I didn't. I thought for sure Triple H would win it, boy was I wrong. Half my money is on either Ted or Cody. Cool, thank you for the present, it made my day... congrats to you too. Sure, I'll read it over and see what I can do. I'll let you know when I get to it. Don't worry, I'm not much of an expert either, but I do have a lot to my name. Chemistry? Are you not good in that area? Yeah, they're good, though, I had to make-up one yesterday [I'm on Christmas break], a Math one, it was so excruciating, that it took a toll on me that I woke up at 1 in the afternoon today (9 your time). Awful. Anyways, I'll get to the PPV article. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  02:24, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Update: Okay, so I read over the article, looks good, though, a couple of things stood out, rather you get it. Lead: "...and a bonus match was aired at the intermission", shouldn't it be during the intermission? IDK, that's the first thing that stood out. Also, are the names of the PPV's supposed to be italicized? Another also, there's too much repetition of the name of the event. I was going to have a consistency with it, but nothing came to mind, or they either didn't make sense. In the Preliminary section, "As a result, at the beginning of the match" doesn't read well, again that's me. Hey, what's a "stereo submission hold"? In the Main event section, I was going to replace "cutting a promo" with "making comments" but decided against it. I'll let you be the judge of that. (I've used "commented" on Taboo Tuesday, Judgment Day, etc., though on Taboo Tuesday '05, I used "explained"). Overall, it's good, nice work. :) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  04:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the link, maybe I'll buy it and see what all the fuzz is about. ;) True. OMG, I just thought of something, what if Batista wins the Rumble? OMG, that'd be awful, especially the way he's acting as a heel (he's not doing a good job of it, Orton is). Yeah, Ted is the better choice. The way they're giving the main titles away, I wouldn't be surprise if Ted won it. Math is a no-no for me, Chemistry is alright, but I'm more experienced in History, my best subject and favorite one. It was a Precalculus exam, me and a couple of other people had to make-up the test. See, this is one of the professors that "care". Yup, me too. I needed a break, and I'm sure you as well. You're welcome, though I hope I exceeded your expectations. Oh, okay, I was like 'I thought we didn't italicize PPV's', but glad you told me it was a regular show. Aw, okay, that makes more sense. Yeah, after Vengeance '06 I had to "retire" from them, too much work. Good that it's out of your way. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:26, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Also, I'm not liking that whole Mickie James being "fat" bit. Really? Is that all you can come up with with a storyline? So shameful. Anyways, had to take that of my chest, yeah I'm chillin' and relaxin', too. Sure, I'm up for it, and it is our next GT. When you wanna start? I did have a good Christmas, I hope you did too, I'm sure of it. ;) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:23, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's sad that she's being portrayed in this "angle". She is, she better looking than McCool and Layla. I can't believe this is even going on. I'm ready, too, just tell me when and where. Yeah, let's split them up. According to here, took me 10 minutes to find, we had plans to divide the articles... in the future, I guess the future's here. Scroll down and find "17:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)" the conversations there. I know you did, you from Ireland, you guys have a good time, I can image you had a better time during Christmas. ;) OMG, me too. Can't wait to party! -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I remember. That's cool, congrats on getting it. :) Look at you, your "evolving" into different projects now. ;) Alright, I'll take the Spirit Squad, Mitch, and I guess Kenny (just looked at his article history). Don't want you dealing with edit warring, bad enough you deal with it in Dolph's article. That cool with you? Oh no... wait, I won't remember anything, either. :P P.S. I don't if you saw the alt text removed from Ted's article. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  20:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, had to do chores. :( Hey, I smile too at all the images I've uploaded and placed into articles... don't you love that feeling? Yeah, I've seen that. I've tried reverting it, but then I go with 'Maybe it's right.' But now that you've explained it to me, I'll revert it when I see it. :) Yeah, we'll forget our plans about the SS. Yeah, I was going to "go back" but I didn't... I know, I'm an awful person. :( -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  21:14, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, I told you I had your back, and I'll continue to defend ya. ;) Yup, we got our proof of work. When I first saw it, I was like 'That's no reliable source', cause I remember you reverted that source one time. But, when I looked over the article and saw Ref. 63 I was like 'Oh shit', so I reverted it. I'm glad you went "going back". ;) I'm glad my "two words" have gone on to "save" me. Question: Would you like for me to expand leads on all SS members? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  21:31, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll keep that in mind now. Yeah, I did a Google search for the PWI listing, but came up empty. I'll keep looking, so. I know, I've seen some people say "going back" or "going back [explaining reason]", I'm so proud of that. I'm glad it's being used for good use. I also saw an IP use it, but for good use. Alright, just needed to know so I could add it to my lead space. I'll start on Mitch's article soon. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  21:48, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, they "award" these awards, but there's no "proof" of them. Don't they have a website to publish them? I got lucky with this link for HBK's article. I'm glad I left it in my edit summary, for the good use of it. :) Yeah, I'll start soon on one of the articles I got, won't be that hard. Here's to our next GT. :) I hope you had a cool New Year and stuff. ;) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  16:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, somethings wrong here. IDK, I guess they want us to guess the outcomes of these awards. Yeah, I was telling myself yesterday 'Start work on the SS members', but I didn't get to it. I'll definitely get to it today, I promise. :) Yeah, it was a wild New Year, pretty fun. ;) I hope you had a fun time, too. Alright, I got the copy-edit for Nemeth, so everything is good to go. One down, a lot more to do. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  16:34, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Update: Hey, can you copy-edit the Spirit Squad for me? Also, can you comment on the lead? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:03, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Dang. I wish snow would fall here, but I got to go to mountains if I want to see snow. Ooh, you picked... to be continued. Nice, you kinda remember your New Year's, cool. :) I got your concerns, hope they're okay, if not let me know. I added the lead to the article. Thanks for the copy-edit I appreciate it. ;) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Lucky you, no school, but get to enjoy the snow. :) Yup, but at the same time it can be dangerous, cause maybe you did something bad, and you can't remember, could be used against you. Of course I've seen it, a good example, though I hope never "abduct" someone. Thank you for your work! Oh, I've nominated the Spirit Squad, just to let you know. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  20:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, let's hope that doesn't happen. Yeah, it's a good movie. The lead is done, check it out, and if something stands out, let me know, or you know, you can assume good faith. That is weird. There's no info. on what he's doing now? Strange. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:51, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Update: I think I may need your help here. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  00:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I was gonna reply 'Actually, it's the other way around', but I just didn't want bickering back-and-forth, so. I don't understand why some people are so damn stubborn about the moves, we have sources right there confirming what type of it is, but they still feel it's wrong. Okay, I got what you said about the lead for Johnny. Whenever you finish, go right ahead and add the lead to his article. Damn. Maybe something happened to him and we just don't know it. Oh, well I re-logged in yesterday and was like 'Damn, Nici is almost done, I got pick up the pace', so I started on the lead. I worked on Mitch's article, though, I'm so damn confused if he's competing with MMA or UFC. Though, the worst part is that I don't know any MMA stuff, I looked at Brock Lesnar's article as example, but that wasn't useful. I did a lot of Google searches and found this site about his fighting record. Trust me, there's a little more needed in Mitch's lead. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  20:50, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know. I see the change, I revert it. Also, I'm starting to get pissed off about people changing "fan favorite" to "face", OMG, people don't get the message that the article is supposed to be written from an out-of-universe perspective. This is getting on my damn nerves. Also, I just had an IP "threatening" me about the change. This is getting ridiculous. Oh, I was reading a TV report, from Raw I guess, and the term "fan favorite" was used. These writers assume it's that move, but really it's not that move. Maybe that happened. I know Mitch left wrestling because that wasn't his life. It says that? Maybe it's another "Nick Mitchell". Damn, I'm screwed now. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  20:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, thank God I didn't log in, kinda been having a rough week, but I thank YOU for reverting the vandalism. Also, I had no idea my talkpage had been vandalized, until I read your comment. Mainly Hennigan's article, as you know, there's also been some activity with that in MVP's article. Luckily, there haven't been "changes" in HBK's, Orton's, Cena's, I think Triple H and Miz, articles. This is so damn stupid of them from their part to change it to their "terms". Really? Hmmm. Maybe the WWE is catching up on these terms, trying to pave a new way for the younger WWE crowd, who knows. Yeah, I know. The first time that was occurring in Cody's article, I looked in the history and saw that both you and Gavyn had reverted, explaining why, which I reverted it as well. Then more of the changes began happening and I was like 'Is this move properly cited?', which it was, but people want to make a case saying that they are right, which in fact they're not. I guess you can make a note saying that at the moment no info. is available of what he is doing at the moment, IDK. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:52, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * God, I hope so. Yeah, I know. But, when you have time to be online, then I'll appreciate your help with that. Really? Damn, Cole trying to be cool? Yeah, I read somewhere that Vince wants to make WWE programming "family friendly" that's why you don't see no more "blood" or hear any of the superstars call each other "SOB". Yeah, I know. They want to make the info. to their understanding, but that's not good enough. The wrestling articles are for everyone, not just wrestling enthusiasts. Yeah, I think you told me, or I saw it at the GAN page. Good luck with the review, I'll help in anyway I can. ;) Thanks, I appreciate that. Remember when we talked about working on Rated-RKO? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  01:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I know you do, and good for you that you warn them for their actions. No, he's not cool. He's such a dork on Raw. IDK if you remember when he won the Slammy for strange moment of the year. He was so lame. Yeah. The HIAC PPV had no blood, and I was like 'What the hell? Last time I saw a HIAC match, there was bleeding involved.' Of course I'll let you know if I need help with SS's review. Yeah, we talked about it, but we came to the conclusion that Edge's article would be difficult to work on. Oh, yeah I saw that. When I started work on it, I remember it said that he was interviewed in SD and that he was gonna return soon, but that the way he stated it was face like. I removed that, as it was POV and notable. Thankfully that hasn't been re-added. The only thing that repeats is "He's returning at the Royal Rumble", which I have to revert due to it being speculation and stuff. Thanks, and trust me, his article was hard to cleanup. The article is protected, and doesn't expire 'til August, thank God. I couldn't take the vandalism anymore. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:42, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, when you have time, do you think you can copy-edit Kenny's article and look over the lead? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  19:21, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That's fine, I'm in no rush with it. It's not a problem, really. I was hoping to get your answer about Kenny and the lead. I'm excited to what your long respond will be. ;) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  21:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, I got your concerns, hope they're alright. Hey, I want your take on something, see, I found this link, and it says "The sacrifices paid off when, just a week after graduating from school [Bay Path Technical] with a degree in cabinet making, the 18-year-old Doane was signed by the WWE to a developmental contract. Doane moved to Louisville, Ky., to work for the WWE's farm system of Ohio Valley Wrestling", do you think he got the degree? Cause, I was going to add it the other day, but I didn't know how to interpret it, so. Oh, and thanks, I try do my best, though, great job on the copy-edit. ;) Yeah, there's Cole always cheering for the faces and stuff. I mean, it's so obvious when he's doing his commentaries. Lawler, he's alright, but the whole "checking out" the divas, is so damn dumb. Agreed. I tried working on Bret's article like two years ago, but I didn't even get to it cause of the constant changes that occur in his article. Yeah, thank God. I'll watchlist the Undertaker's article. But, if the vandalism returns, it can be re-protected. Oh, yeah, I remember seeing that. I was going to change it, but an edit conflict happened, so I never got to it. Even I knew that was bad grammar... people these days. Yeah, hopefully. No more activity in Morrison's article about the "fan favorite" stuff, which is good. Hey, no need to apologize, I understand what you're going through; I've been there. :) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:56, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of King Parsons


The article King Parsons has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * BLP unreferenced for almost five years. Spammy; like a resume.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 18:49, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message, but I've only edited the article twice, both times in order to make it comply with the WP:PW style guide. I've no vested interest, or any interest for that matter, in the article. Thanks, ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 21:21, 29 January 2010 (UTC)