User talk:NiciVampireHeart/Archive 18

WikiCup 2010 January newsletter
We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. We've had some shakeups regarding late entries, flag changes and early dropouts, but the competition is now established- there will be no more flag changes or new competitors. Congratulations to, our current leader, who, at the time of writing, has more listed points than and   (second and third place respectively) combined. A special well done also goes to - his artcle Jewel Box (St. Louis, Missouri) was the first content to score points in the competition.

Around half of competitors are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. 64 of the 149 current competitors will advance to round 2- if you currently have no points, do not worry, as over half of the current top 64 have under 50 points. Everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places in round 2! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! J Milburn, Garden, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

hello
how r u?DustinNewkirk (talk) 19:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm fine thank you. So tell me, who are you? Or more pertinently of which blocked account are you the sock? I have a hard time believing that a new user managed to find their way to my talk page on their second edit, without arriving to complain about me reverting them or something. I've haven't reverted you, or tagged tany of your article for deletion, whoch leads me to the conclusion that you're a sock. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 15:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Hey
hey —Preceding unsigned comment added by AmieGunter (talk • contribs) 18:39, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 19:43, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Hey
Well... well looks like I was right about Ezekiel Jackson... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.75.180.243 (talk) 22:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Hey
...well everyone else seemed to be doing it. Tony2Times (talk) 23:55, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah well almost everyone knows what goes on in WWE so it seems like we should be providing more information about the harder to find stuff. Also it's more of a fun challenge to go on the hunt for hard to find indies which is what I enjoyed about revamping MsChif and Eden Black's pages among others. Thanks for giving a subedit to it as well though, I'm terrible at editing myself and when writing so much it's inevitable there'll be some typos and whatnot. Tony2Times (talk) 18:43, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Princess Paula (Re: Dave Fit Finlay)
Hello.

I have unreversed your reverts to my additions and added some sources in order to prove to you that Princess Paula Valdez, the noisy head-dress wearing ex-wife and ex-manager of Dave Finlay did (and presumably still does) indeed exist. Although to be honest this is something of which most people in the UK aged over 30 are perfectly well aware!

And if Youtube clips were acceptable Wiki sources, I would have added these: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHf7EalBmJ4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iUGvFItmvU

Regards

86.154.169.161 (talk) 14:57, 14 February 2010 (UTC)DM

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:19, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Nick Nemeth source conflict
The source that I added to Nick Nemeth's profile has been used in several other articles (e.g., Chris Jericho, Rob Terry, Jeff Hardy, Matt Hardy, Chris Hero...), so it is not "dubious." Also, please don't forget that you do not own that article and you cannot revert every edit you disagree with, which is evident in the history of that article. -WikiFew (talk) 03:35, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * While I understand the need to use reliable sources, I think you are using that to defend your vision of the article. His article also features several uses of sources whose reliability has not yet been proven according to the the style guide, but those sections of the article are not removed despite your own suggestion to stick with proven sites.  If a proven resource contradicts my proposed edit, that would be a different case, but it is clear as editors who have viewed Dolph Ziggler's matches that the two moves in question are the same.  There is no source that states a reverse bulldog is a different move than a leaping Russian legsweep and since wrestling is not a science with strict nomenclature, there are several instances of a move being named different ways. -WikiFew (talk) 04:12, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I just wanted to leave you one final comment to let you know that I'm not going to pursue this point any further. I already knew that due to the strict rules of Wikipedia, I would be fighting an uphill battle here because PWTorch will never publish an article just to say "Oh by the way, the reverse bulldog and the jumping Russian legsweep are the same move;" however, you and I both know, as fans of pro wrestling, that the system of nomenclature is flimsy and practically non-existent and it doesn't take long to think of other instances of conflicting terminology.  I think that, in all honesty, if you were to compare the matches in which Ziggler performed the move in question, you would see that the moves are the same.  In spite of this disagreement, I do see that you work hard to remove a lot of gross vandalism on pro wrestling pages, so I thank you for that. -WikiFew (talk) 04:37, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 12:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Wondering
We haven't really spoken much in a long time. I don't know why, hopefully I didn't upset you or anything. If I did something wrong I'm sorry. Anyway, I thought to come and ask if you wanted to work on Bryan Danielson together? I remember you saying something about him one day. More news out there about him now thanks to his WWE work, I thought it would be fun. We never got to work on anything together.-- Will C  12:26, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, maybe later. Good luck with school, you got my support. Bye! :)-- Will C  14:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

New one
Spooky, I too wanted to create a new section, but wanted to create it when you replied back. Damn, you beat me again. We'll meet again. A joke. Yeah, it is strange. So, you think I should add the bit [about the cabinet degree]? Yup. I was lucky too that I that article. Agreed, he needs to calm down with his "flirting". Yeah, damn IPs and unregistered users tend to mess up articles. That's why they're such a damn problem, and kill it for everyone. Yeah, I know. Thank God articles like HBK, Triple H, Cena, Orton, and others are in good condition. I've watchlisted the article, so if something comes up, I'll see if it needs to be revert, or not. Really? I have a "review" exam coming up, too. Our history professor believes we aren't studying enough, sucks, though. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  22:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yup, yup. :) Alright, I'll add it. I just wanted to be sure on that one. Yeah, me too. Take Brad Pitt for example, if his article were to be unprotected, imagine all the constant vandalism and crap. I couldn't deal with that; it would stress me out. People saying negative stuff about you in your article? Hmmm, does a certain someone have sympathy for a certain article? My "review" is next week, it was just revealed to us. Yeah, I did. Somehow, I was right. Yeah, I wouldn't call it "fun" as much as "oh, are you serious". I could use some help, remember the article's protection expires in August, but I understand. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  16:45, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, this all goes back to those rumors of him and Jennifer splitting up, and look what happened. Yeah, you'd be like 'What did I do?', you know. Make you feel bad that people out there hate you. I know you don't like him for his wrestling... right? Well, just if you see stuff like "Edge sucks" or "He always cheats", etc. I'll take care of the rest. So, what do you think I should do with Mitch's article? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:23, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No apologies necessary. I didn't think my comment above was "replying material". I figured you logged in to revert stuff, so. I've done that, too. Alright, in your opinion, he's an awful wrestler. If they stopped pushing him and stuff, which will start happening (at the moment he has an injury of some sort), would you hate him less? I know you would still hate him because of his wrestling, but the push, I mean. Yeah, you're welcome on that. Just doing my part. Though, that damn IP started getting on my nerves. I was looking at the warning templates, for grammar related stuff, but I couldn't find one, hence, why I didn't warn the IP. You know, maybe it's another Nick Mitchell, cause I've read bio. summaries of his, and they don't mention MMA at all. The source about him in MMA says he's training to be one of them, I guess. IDK. Should I just leave it the way it is? If asked, I could say that there is no info. available on his matches? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  19:26, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, see, I was right. ;) Don't worry about it, you do your thing, and then when you have the time, "reply" to me... IDK... I'm so tired. I stayed up all night, celebrating an impressive victory by the team I was rooting for. :) Well worth it. Alright, just wanted to see if your opinion of him would change. :) Yeah, lucky you. HBK's protection expires next month, so looking forward to that. Alright, I'll leave it as it is. If you can do me a favor and copy-edit Mitch's article, I would appreciate it a whole lot... if time is on your side. :) I do believe you got the lead a while back. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:24, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I appreciate that. I hope you've given yourself credit for the Spirit Squad, since you are the main contributor. :) I just did the lead and read-through. It was a good game. Wow, that was a low-blow. I didn't get to watch Raw, cause I was working on a project, and a TV was not near by. Somehow, I knew that DX would lose the titles. The Miz got lucky. Again, a low-blow. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Trust me, I have those days, too. ;) So what, you did a copy-edit, better than a "read-through". Yeah, I know you. I knew you would bring that up, but it's fine I guess. I've brought up Cena in "not pleasant conversations". ;) IDK, this whole angle of Shawn being "obsessed" with Taker is not looking good. IMO, it's making him look bad. Yeah, that's what I thought. Big Show was champ for a long time, figured they give it to "new faces". No, Miz is not awesome. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Alright, I tried to persuade you to get credit, didn't work. Thanks for the copy-edit, I appreciate it. ;) Damn, I had a cold not that long ago. I hope you feel better. Damn the fire bell. Was there a fire, or was it the whole fire "routine"? Yeah, I saw it pop-up on my watchlist, like always, and I said to myself, 'I'm not touching that', but there was no way I could ignore it, so, you're welcome for that. IDK, everyone's saying that the match between the two will not happen, that is just "hype". I thought maybe Shawn and Batista would be in a feud, but it doesn't seem likely. Yeah, if this rematch happens, will Shawn win it? I mean, yeah, this is 'Taker's legacy and stuff, but why have this happen again? If this does happen, this should be the main event at 'Mania. Yeah, it seems that this year and maybe next year will be HBK's "final" days with the WWE, I don't seem him doing this 'til 50. The whole Punk thing is so lame, yes he's a good heel, but "straight edge" no. I'm surprised you like this, despite the fact that you "go to the bottle". ;) Whatever, Punk asked for it when he said he wanted "competition". Man, I started laughing when Triple H came out, then HBK, and Cena, of course. Miz is not awesome than HBK, don't know what you talkin' about. :P -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  19:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Damn, that sucks. That happened to us here, though it was later revealed that someone had pulled the switch, when I was in high school, and it was on one of the hottest days we had to stand outside. Yeah, I know. Every time I log in, I'm like 'What hell do I have to deal with now?'. Really? Damn, I wished I would have seen Raw. Yeah, right, best match. It just goes back to their "not so great match" at SummerSlam. He really is. He's still got that inside him, and can outperform anyone, yes, I mean anyone. :) Agreed, when HBK did that moonsault at WM24, I thought for sure he'd be done&mdash;broken ribs&mdash;but I was wrong. I mean, it'll be sad when he leaves, but he's already accomplished, he doesn't need to prove anything anymore, you know. Damn, 'Taker is old, but he and HBK are the same age, though 'Taker is older in months. Hip replacement? Agreed, people should take risks than to wonder "What if". Yup, couldn't have said it better myself. ;) A beer in one hand and a chocolate bar in the other, that's living the life. :P Awesome than Punk? Ooh, got ya there. --  ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Like Mr. Kennedy? He's definitely out of my watchlist, too much going on. I hope you haven't given up on Cody or Ted's articles. I can't do it all by myself. ;) Yeah, I feel ya on that. I've gotten rid of a couple, like DX, constant changes, really. Don't need to be stressing over non-important articles, you know. Yeah, I had to look away every time they kept replaying it, it was just awful to see, but the good thing was that HBK was victorious at the end. Yeah, me too. That's what I want to see. He can do a superb job as champion, but IDK why the hell the WWE won't give him that chance, jeez. Tag team champ, yes it works, but solo would work a lot better. It is. I remember watching Hogan Knows Best, and in one of the episodes, Hogan was saying he needed hip replacement. Damn, is 'Taker already "there"? So, Miz is "awesome" than Morrison? I believe I got you there. :P -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  23:19, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry for my late reply, I got carried away here. Yeah, I know what you mean. ;) I had Christian on my watchlist, but too much going on, so it was removed. I checked on it on Friday, boy is there a lot going on. Yeah, I do my part. :) I kinda have too, don't want the GT to be delisted. TBH, when we were discussing Legacy as a topic, I wanted to work on Ted's article, but you got to it first. No hard feelings, though, you did a better job. ;) It was. Yup, get in the ring (to see if it's real or fake) and see whether or not you get injured. Whatever [on Morrison and the Miz]. I gotta say that I was surprised with all the vandalism on Miz's article. Gone for two days, and a lot happened. If this happens in the next 24 hrs. protection might need to be brought in the picture, this is really ridiculous, you know. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  22:08, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but it's alright. Actually, I was kinda glad I didn't get Ted, cause it seems you did a lot of research for his article. So, I got lucky. No hard feelings. :) I mean, I had Randy, so. I know, Ted and Cody are your favorites. ;) Yeah, I know. The day after they won, I fixed the info. but I removed the triple thing. Right after I saved my changes, Vjmlhds came and added the triple champion thing. Yeah, that's true, though, less vandalism, I guess. Yeah, I know. I had to stop cause I reverted his edits three times, and I didn't want to get in trouble. Hey, I looked over the entire WWE title page, and didn't find anything of him being the first anything. If he means this ---> "...while enabling Miz to wrap yet another lustrous prize around his waist, in addition to the U.S. Title", that's totally not it. Though, him saying and I quote, "NO OTHER WRESTLER HAS EVER HELD 3 BELTS AT THE SAME TIME IN WWE HISTORY, AND A LOOK AT THE TITLE HISTORIES WILL VERIFY IT. WHAT'S SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND?" and "WWE.com considers the WWE and World Tag Titles as separate. Add that with the U.S. Title, and Miz holds 3 titles. Has anyone else done it? No. Thus he's the first", are POV and OR. I was like 'Finally, we got him', with his "statements". If he comes back to the article, he'll definitely will get blocked. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  15:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, see. :) Yup, you can say that again. Though, it seems like Randy traits, you know. I gotta say I was worried for him in his match with Kofi last night, he looked as though he was playing the "concussion" angle. Are you pulling for him at the Chamber? It's not hard to understand the SYNTH and and 3RR guidelines. I mean, there are users like that who are stubborn and just don't care that they're violating policy. There's a reason for those rules. *yup, I'm rolling my eyes, too* Yeah. On a funny note, I wonder if any WWE people read our threads, cause they "called out" Lawler's infatuation with "young girls", catch my drift? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I highly doubt it. He's said he didn't like doing it, and no one bought it, so I don't see it happening. Unless he had a change of heart. Oh. Well, at the start, I mean after Randy and Sheamus's match, Randy hit the RKO on Cody, while Sheamus did that side kick to Ted. Ted looked awful in his match with Kofi, but he won the match. Randy and Ted? It looks more like Randy and Cody, since Cody is messing up his matches. I too have the same feeling about Triple H. Exactly, damn people these days. I know they should. It was so funny when they said something about him being somewhere with little girls or something, I forgot. But it was still funny. I was laughing and saying 'I hope Nici is watching this.' But, yeah. :) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  20:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

I gotta say that I'm not happy with Batista as WWE champion. This is the worst thing to happen since that Irish dude got the title. What the hell is the WWE thinking? Whatever. Anyways, who knows, about Randy. I'd like to see how he acts and stuff, but won't have my hopes up. Yeah, it'll be a "big" win for Cody if he beats him at 'Mania. Though, I hope the WWE plans to give Ted some recognition and stuff. Will you be getting Morrison's DVD, or plan to watch it? I'm not sure about all the PPV's being themed. It seems cheesy to me. Are you liking the theme for the PPV's? Yeah, it was so funny, can't believe you didn't watch it. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  02:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey buddy, got to see/hear from ya. :) It seems like it's been years since we've talked. Oh yeah, because of the stuff that occurred yesterday, see Legacy, Ted, and Randy's articles, and you'll know what I'm talking about. Anyways, it sucked the way the Raw EC ended. Though, was I shocked what HBK did in the SD EC. This sucks, his career is over if he loses to 'Taker at 'Mania, I cried when he accepted the challenge. Yeah, but if the WWE releases one of the Miz DVD's, I'm sure you'll buy it. What? Survivor Series? What are they changing it too? "The Elimination Match PPV"? One of my fav. PPV's, and they killed it, sucks. I told you it was funny. Oh yeah, you're welcome, just doing my friend a favor. ;) That sucks. My exams are in two weeks and I've been slacking off, I've been under too much stress. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  19:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I did, I really really did. I was like 'Am I the only one online?'. Oh well. Yeah. I didn't want to get in trouble, so I stopped undoing the edits, Legacy is not an article I'm willing up to get blocked for, so. But, somehow I know you go through this all the time, so it was the second time I experienced it this year [the Miz]. I've experienced it a whole bunch of other times, though separate times. Yeah, that would be great. Actually, I was so "upset" about the undoings that I almost consider asking that the article be semi-protected until next Monday, you know, but decided against it. Yeah, I know. I was like 'If he loses, I have no will in my soul to continue watching Raw. What for?' Yeah, it's strange, though, you and I were talking about their lives and stuff, and this angle plays out. I didn't think HBK would want to leave this soon. OMG, Vince is do dumb. These themed PPV's will not help, you just watch. I know you do, and I know you'd do the same for me. :) I wish you good luck on your math exams, and hope you don't slack off. I mean, I'm prepared for the other exams, just not the math one, hence why I'm slacking off. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  20:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, there's been days where I'm like 'Am I the only here?', that other day can be added to that list. Yeah, I'm glad you were online to help out. Though, XSRE has already violated 3RR on Legacy and Randy's articles, but doesn't seem to care, and getting on my nerves. Exactly, how long has this angle of attacking each other, winning a match over one another, bailing out on each other, etc., been playing out? These people don't learn, which is quite sad all at the same time, you know. Yeah, me too. For these past few weeks I've been watching Raw just to watch HBK... yeah just HBK. I've lost interest, really. Nah, I didn't get to see NXT, TBH I have no plans to check the show out. Yeah, IDK what Vince is doing, I think he's lost it. I'm surprised WM still has its name. Oh Trig? Man, I do indeed wish you good luck. I don't understand it, I mean a little, but not an expert on it. Oh, I've been there, too. I've had nightmares, though. The fact that you can't sleep is great, but dreaming about it is not cool. Thank you, thank you, and yeah, in two weeks. Then, I have a Calculus exam in April, which I'm not prepared for. Why is math so damn hard? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  20:18, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alex Montalvo


The article Alex Montalvo has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sources found at GNews/GBooks/GScholar; no mention at World Wrestling Council's website, and only 4 mentions on the International Wrestling Association website: 2 are dead links; 1 is a forum entry and the other says "Alex Montalvo & Golden Boy : 08/13/05 : Bayamon, PR" in a list of IWA World Tag Team Championship matches.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 08:22, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:18, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Rob Terry (Welsh Language)
Could you have a go at creating Rob Terry in the Welsh language i have tried, failed and been banned from editing on the Welsh wikipedia just for having a go at creating it but if you could try to do a better job then me then please do so i used google translator but if you cant do it then dont worry Youndbuckerz (talk) 11:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:18, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 21:46, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Bolding Finishers
Bolding someones finishers used to be common place. Is that no longer the case? Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 21:18, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Jirus
Hi, you seem to have an interest in wrestling. For your info, I PROD'ed this guy, as I find the information dubious, at best. Perhaps you can find sources, I cannot. best Power.corrupts (talk) 15:34, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, well I'm glad it was deprodded. Prodding because of confusion over his nname seems a little extreme to me, surely a discussion on the talk page or at WT:PW would have been better? No matter. I'll attempt to root up some sources in the next week or so, if I manage to find the time. Certainly the article of a former ROH Champion should not be deleted. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 22:03, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

MXW Pro Wrestling
I recently revised the entire MXW Pro Wrestling article in an effort to save it from deletion. The original entry was written before the company went on an indefinite hiatus and wasn't particularly neutral in its point of view. I made an effort to add citations to the rewritten article wherever possible but I'm not sure if that will be enough to save it. I would greatly appreciate any suggestions or constructive criticism you may be able to offer. Thanks! Demanufactured (talk) 08:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I'm extremely pressed for time at the moment, and cannot help you. Best to find reliable, secondary sources that prove notability, and let the AFD run its course. Thanks, ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 22:03, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Edward Chastain
Edward Chastain is a wrestling based article that doesn't assert notability. There are other issues with it as well, but notability is just one of the issues. I want you to put your thoughts in for this proposed deletion. Thanks. Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 17:34, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If that is case, then you could spend time improving articles then putting them up for deletion, ie: Alternative Wrestling Show and all their titles. There is no way to assert his notability.  So it hard to expand that article.   Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 22:03, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I haven't been able to find anything. I search for the promotions he won titles in, but I couldn't find anything aside from the NWA promotions.  When searching for Edward Chastain himself, all you find is what is already on the article.  That doesn't cut it.  But I understand about your time.  I was just bringing it too your attention.   Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 23:04, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 19:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

You start it, I have to do it too
I hope you know what I mean with the header. :P When I log in I see you on my watchlist, but sometimes I don't, and I know why. I just wait 'til someone logs in and can help out with what's going on. I already did, he reverted my edit on Orton's article, so I warned him. If he undoes it again, he's getting reported. Yeah, people think it's finally come to that. Hell, the first time this started playing out I thought for sure they were done, but they weren't. Man, the WWE is making it harder on us here. Daniel Bryan? That sounds like a business name, not a wrestling one. Yup, and has been added to my list. Man, this goes back to Kennedy's release. Yeah, if you know Algebra and Geometry you'll get a good score. Yeah, tell me about it. My first year was pre-Calculus, that stuff was hard. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  19:59, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, cool. I think he did. I'm not crossing my fingers, though, cause he'll be back to do what he does "best", make trouble for all of us. I know, exactly. This has been playing out for a long time now and people think each week they're done for. I mean, can't you see the pattern of it all? People these days. Really? Cody and Ted faces? But, what about Orton turning on them, isn't he suppose to be the face? It's like 'Make up your mind and choose who's going to be face.' We'll see tonight whether or not they remain a team... or not. Ooh, Biology and Chemistry one of the many things I do enjoy. I wish you the best with them. ;) P.S. Some IP ended up finding a PW Torch ref. to verify that Cody's finisher, the Cross Rhodes, is an "Inverted swinging neckbreaker", just wanted to let you know about that, cause I ended up reverting the IP's edits, as the original move was removed. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  15:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, okay, cause I looked it over and was 'Oh wow, I guess this is the right move', but I'm glad you explained it to me. I have a hard time telling what move is which, one of my problems that I had while writing PPV articles. Yeah, or do this. Yeah, if they do say 'It's over, no more of this' or 'you're holding us down' or whatever, then yeah this Legacy is over... sorry I couldn't resist. It really is. Damn the WWE for including us in this misfortune. That's good. Chemistry isn't that bad, but you know, some like it some don't. I wish you good luck on your Chem exam, you'll pass it I know it. :) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:06, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, alright, I'll keep that in mind for the future. Well, here is one "l", but since she's French-Canadian the spelling is with two "ll". . Trust me, when I first ended up putting "modelling" on her article I did my research. Let's see what plays out today. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:22, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * That's what I thought, too, but no, they use different spellings. Who knew, right? I'm "disappointed" that the US lost to Canada, I can't believe that. Oh well. Anyways, yeah, I'm up to doing the lead. I'll get it done either today or tomorrow. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:46, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, maybe that's it, cause we make fun of them and stuff. They beat us in hockey. I mean, IDK, I'm a hockey fan of the Los Angeles Kings but half the players are Canadians, so really I didn't know who to root for. Oh well. Aw, I wanted to see that rugby game, but I had to study and TV was off limits for me. Alright, then. Just tell me when you're done with your research so that I could work on the lead, and I guess be on the same page. :) What will future projects be in stored for us, I wonder. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:59, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the gold medal. Oh well. Like I said, I didn't know who to root for, though I'm not Canadian, but was hoping that the US would take it. Yeah, it's a Canadian sport, but who cares it's a fun sport. Something told me to just watch the game and study at the same time, but I knew that I would forget about my studies and focus on the game. Damn, I can't believed I missed it. So did you guys advance? Cause, I saw the game between England and Wales, and I think England advance, IDK. I'm sure you had a blast at the pub, you know, beer everywhere. Yeah, I know, when you and I are done with school, in the summer, we can choose something to work on. :) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  19:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

IDK about that, I actually enjoy being an American. :) "What kind of guy am I", long pause, "douchebag", lol. I'm a have to start saying that now, well, not saying that I'm a douchebag. Anyways, nice video. Charlie Haas got released? Damn, didn't know that. You want me to add the article to my watchlist? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  20:22, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Update: I guess Legacy is over. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  15:48, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you better be kidding.... just playing. ;) At first I when I was watching the video I was like 'He's talking, a big no-no' then he got to the point "What kind of guy am I"—long pause—"A douchebag", very hilarious. I'll add the article anyway so you don't half-stress yourself out. :) Yeah, I know. I was going to "clean it up" but ended up getting an edit conflict so I saw that as a sign not to do it. I apologize that you had to do it. I went through Orton's and it seems fine. Though, I gotta say that the whole bit for the Kofi feud in Legacy's article is too much, don't you think? OMG, at first I thought the link was to Spanky "out rapping" Cena, but it wasn't. "Congratulations on your win", pause, "I didn't win", another pause, to other dude, "Congratulations on your win", funny. OMG, I just got in trouble for laughing. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  15:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You know, it's quiet, meaning low activity today, which is quite nice. :) Oh, okay, I just felt that I needed to let you know. Though, it's my fault for telling myself that an edit conflict wasn't going to happen. Yeah, but if that was on Orton's I would remove half of that info. is just too much. It's alright, I showed the person next to me, though I explained to him before he saw it, he laughed. After I laughed my professor goes "Something funny?", I'm like "No, sir... I just thought of something that happened", while everyone turned to look at me, very nerve racking. I'll watch the video later, I'm in a "strict" class, if you know what I mean. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:45, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It's okay, I guess, I mean I should get use to this by now. Yeah, that's how I feel, too, sometimes about editing, like I just don't give a damn, but later on, I have to give a damn, which sucks. I really didn't do much, and I think I ended up making it worst, so. But hey, you have another GA, which is good. :) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  22:27, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I wasn't sure whether or not to create a new section, I went back and forth with it, but decided against it. I know, you told me you were going to be busy and stuff, I figured that you didn't reply to me cause you was handlin' yo business... very understandable. ;) You don't have to worry, I didn't feel ignored, I didn't think my response "demanded" a reply. If you want, I'll work on Mikey. When I'm done, you can look over the article and lead, if you got the time. I got time, spring break will be next week, so I can add it to my list of projects, so you don't have to worry. :) Hey, do you have a suggestion on how to re-write these sentences ---> "Pitt reunited with Juliette Lewis, co-star from Too Young to Die?, in the 1993 road film Kalifornia, in which he played Early Grayce, a serial killer and the boyfriend of Lewis's character" and "His approximation for the accent received divided opinion"? -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  23:39, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Update: Is there a way you can help me out with Kenny's review? You don't have to do anything, just comment, I guess. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  00:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)