User talk:Nicibuff

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 13:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello, I'm Synorem. I noticed that in this edit to The Light (newspaper), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 13:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I do not agree to the far right, and conspiracy theorist label and this paper has a right to free speech. That is a basic human right.  People have a right to read this paper and make their own mind up without you putting labels on them Nicibuff (talk) 13:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Why do you think that this newspaper is fat right? have you got verifiable proof. Alex Jones is labelled as a conspiracy theorist, but has been right on a number of occasions Nicibuff (talk) 14:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * There is an entire section on "far-right links" to back up the claim. —C.Fred (talk) 14:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The article is based on what is written in reliable sources, not your opinions. As far as adding free speech to what they've been accused of, they were not accused of "free speech Holocaust denial", but just plain old "Holocaust denial". —C.Fred (talk) 14:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Have you any sources, as I have asked if you have verifiable proof Nicibuff (talk) 14:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * far right is not what they are, they are not neo nazis, thats Ukrainian policies. Nicibuff (talk) 14:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Sources are listed in the text. If you are going to counter a claim on an article, include your sources too. It does not make too much sense to ask for a source if you have not provided any on your article yourself. Synorem (talk) 14:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I have replied with what is already present in the article. Since I'm acting in administrative capacity, I'm not getting into the details of the content, just on the behavioural issues of your removal of verifiable information. —C.Fred (talk) 14:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh, have I hit a nerve. If youve read the light, there are various doctors that claim that the pandemic was a way to control us. Nicibuff (talk) 14:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * and by blocking me, means you dont agree with free speech pr an entitlement to make ones mind up without cohersio Nicibuff (talk) 14:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If you did your own research like I have. you wouldnt need to ask for sources Nicibuff (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * No? There is a set of Wikipedia policies you have to follow. Every country, even those with free speech, still have policies and laws the people have to follow. Synorem (talk) 14:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * We have not, which is - again - why we ask you to cite your sources, as not everyone will read the same material you do. Synorem (talk) 14:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * You need to watch the bbc report of neo nazis in ukraine, then youll know who the neo nazis are Nicibuff (talk) 14:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Unless you're suggesting that the BBC mentioned The Light, so it should be described as a neo-Nazi publication as well as a far-right publication, I'm not seeing how that BBC report is relevant here. —C.Fred (talk) 15:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)