User talk:Nick0616/sandbox

Nick, your assessment is good as far as it goes, but you only address the issue of content. What about tone? Sources and citations? Elyssafaison (talk) 17:02, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Higuchi Keiko article choice
Nick, this is a good choice. You need to do some research and come up with additional sources in addition to whatever translations from the Japanese Wikipedia article you use. The article as it exists is very sparse and not well-written, so there is a lot of room for you to improve it. Think about what sections you might want to include. Try using Japan Knowledge database for both English and Japanese sources of information on her. Elyssafaison (talk) 03:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Nick, you still need to add Higuchi Keiko as your article choice on our Wikipedia course page. Go to our course, click "articles" and then input Higuchi Keiko to select the article. Elyssafaison (talk) 03:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review
Seems as though you have good sources and are prepared to fully contribute to this article. All sources seem to be neutral as well as accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NWhitten1776 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Review Response
Thank you for your input. I will use these sources to expand the page and polish as much as I can. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick0616 (talk • contribs) 11:48, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Instructor comments
Nick, I am still waiting for there to be something in your sandbox to review. At this point there should be a full article that you are working on. I see the paragraph where you say you will work on Higuchi Keiko, and you list a few sources, but there is still no article to review. Elyssafaison (talk) 00:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)