User talk:Nick5carr/Chingo

Preliminary Review from Kaylea
Hi, I'm starting to walk through articles and give everyone informal early feedback on how they're doing. You'll notice this is a little bit form-letter-ish but I hope it is still helpful.

I see you've made some changes and are starting to incorporate elements from our training, but there's still a ways to go with this article to improve it by a full quality class.

You are using some good sources, but each one is only adding a small bit of information. Maybe there are sources out there with more information, or you can dig more deeply into the ones you have? Don't forget to add citations so that it's clear where the information came from. I know we talked about this, but it's definitely a challenging topic in terms of information availability. You can keep searching for more material, or you might want to re-evaluate this choice.

Kaylea Champion (talk) 01:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

peer review
Hi, I have reviewed your article and left some suggestions. plz check it out! HyeyoungKimuw (talk) 04:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Go Live Approval
Hi

Good work. You are approved to go live with article. I made some text tweaks, see what you think of them.

The old article is so small that the "copy carefully" steps hardly apply, but they're here for reference if you need them....

As a reminder, here are our go-live steps:


 * 1) Final read-through draft.
 * 2) Check live article for changes. [History Tab]
 * 3) Two browsers side by side, if you can. Source editing mode ("Code mode"), not visual editor.
 * 4) Paragraph by paragraph copy, leaving behind an explanatory edit summary after each chunk of changes.
 * 5) Note on article talk page.
 * 6) Note at the top of your sandbox version.
 * 7) Submit a link to your article on Canvas.
 * 8) Celebrate!

Kaylea Champion (talk) 05:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)