User talk:NickRovinsky

December 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Pahlevun (talk) 12:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

December 2016
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Iranian Americans. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Plagiarism, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of designated terrorist groups without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. '' I am assuming that your motivation is that the group has been de-listed. Do you have any reliable sources demonstrating this to be the case?'' Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your message. I thought that I had left an explanation on the talk page. If not, you are definitely right. I will check and add it later this evening when I return home from work.
 * Regarding the designation, it has been removed many years ago (The designation in UK and EU were removed in May 2008 and 2009 relatively and from the U.S. FTO on 2012). Here is an independent study in to the status of MEK, by Ambassador Lincoln Bloomfield that also provides information about the delisting of the MEK. https://www.amazon.com/Mujahedin-Khalq-Shackled-Twisted-History/dp/0615783848
 * Here are some reviews on the book:
 * http://www.ubalt.edu/about-ub/news-events/homepage-feature-items/feature-item-57.cfm

NickRovinsky (talk) 14:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Noticing the fact that "pahlevun" and "Denarivs", and perhaps others that will step in, have an agenda to abuse Wikipedia on behalf of the Iran's tyrannical regime, and to demonize the opposition groups that are standing up to the dictatorship and the gross violations of human rights in that country, particularly against women, I see it a duty to help modify the page PMOI based on truth and unbiased information and to inform the public of the intended demonization campaign by the agents of the Iranian regime's ministry of intelligence and Security. I would encourage the Wikipedia Admins and/or volunteers that honor a balanced encyclopedia to help me on this task.NickRovinsky (talk) 15:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.