User talk:NickTheRipper

Welcome NickTheRipper! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are registered editors!

Hello, NickTheRipper. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions! I'm Paine Ellsworth, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page, and someone will try to help. Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp. The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun! To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own private sandbox] for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

 Sincerely, Stick to sources!  Paine   09:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)   [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paine_Ellsworth&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)] Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

Disambiguation link notification for August 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Varieties of Modern Greek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italiot Greek. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Greece Invitation!
I have added it since last month :) NickTheRipper (talk) 06:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

It's ok, I've just didn't notice you are already a member.Alexikoua (talk) 19:29, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Regions of ancient Greece into Arcadia (ancient region). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 22:23, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Ok, I didn't know this. Thanks! NickTheRipper (talk) 12:30, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Macedonian Greek or Greek Macedonian for Ancient Macedonians
Hello. Please refrain from adding the clarification "Greek" next to the word "Macedonian" like how you have done in the following page here:.

Your motives are very understandable, however, the use of modern-day clarifications stemming from the Macedonia Naming Dispute to describe ancient Greek figures such as Ptolemy I Soter, is not very appropriate.

The use of "Macedonian Greek" for ancient Macedonians, gives the false impression that there might have been non-Greek Ancient Macedonians besides the Greek Ancient Macedonians. And therefore, I am asking you very kindly to refrain from repeating this mistake in the future and rather call them all simply "Ancient Macedonians" without any further qualifiers just like how it was done for Athenians and Spartans too. Ancient Greek figures must be left out of the naming dispute that has affected modern-day Balkan-related articles. -- S ILENT R ESIDENT  08:46, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

The references themselves use the term "Macedonian Greeks" to describe them and that's why I used it. But I understand what you mean and I totally agree with you that the modern dispute mustn't get involved in this. Anyway, have a nice day! NickTheRipper (talk) 20:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Please watch your edit summaries
Note that edit summaries should be detached, encyclopaedic, and convey enough information as to the changes you've made (policy-based explanations such as WP:UNDUE, etc. are a good example of making it clear to other editors why content is being changed), not summaries such as this. Please read WP:SUMMARYNO and WP:SHOUT. It's off-putting for other editors to encounter combative remarks which are uncalled for. Cheers, and happy editing! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:03, 13 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Ok, I'm sorry, I guess. NickTheRipper (talk) 21:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * That's fine. It wasn't my intention to sound like an old nag. I'm just trying to forewarn you that there are editors who have a low threshold for forming grudges. We know this is resource anyone can edit, and that slightly silly content can be added in good faith. If you were the editor who'd added the content without realising that it was awkwardly phrased and were watching the article, it might get your hackles up to basically be called a fool. If you were to start editing on more controversial articles using strident edit summaries, you'd be in hot water before you knew what was happening. It's best to stick to neutral summaries. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Sappho
Can you explain why you added template:dubious in this edit? Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 13:34, 11 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Of course I can. Who says that she is a "symbol" of homosexuality? An unknown and unreliable homosexual writer maybe? How is this possible while in reality she was not even homosexual and on top of that these claims came into existence only during the 18th century. Even the fact that some people classified Sappho as homosexual cannot explain why there is such an absolute definition of her being a "symbol" of homosexuality in the lead sentence of the sexuality section. Thank you. NickTheRipper (talk) 16:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, Glenn Most, whose paper is cited at the end of that sentence, for one. Margaret Reynolds agrees in The Sappho Companion, saying that today Sappho is more famous for being a lesbian than for her poetry.  Daniel Mendehlson says that for "many readers" she is "a gay role model".  Susan Gubar (in "Sapphistries") calls Sappho a symbol of lesbian artists whose works have been suppressed or heterosexualised, and a model for lesbian literature.
 * As for how it's possible: one does not need to be a membewr of some group to be a symbol of or for that group. I don't believe that any doves are actually members of the Liberal Democrats, nor trees members of the Conservative Party, but those things are still symbols of those parties.  And, at any rate the claim that Sappho was not homosexual is not at all agreed on, and the claim that she had sex with women goes back at least to the second century AD with Maximus of Tyre.  Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 12:38, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ... while she was born at 630 BC(!). So, an author came about 800+ years later to support that Sappho was indeed homosexual. Very convincing. Anyway, I still don't think that she is a symbol of homosexuality just because some writers of the past century told this. However, if you and the other editors think so, then I have nothing more to say. Thank you. NickTheRipper (talk) 17:53, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Cappadocian Greeks
Hey! I think we probably fundamentally agree on this article. Thanks for cleaning up my word choice, which I realize could be seen as suggesting that Cappadocian Greeks are somehow not Greek, which is not what I wished to say...I'm the one who added some famous Cappadocian Greeks, like John Chrysostomos, Mimar Sinan, and the Emperor Maurice, to other articles (if you want to see real edit wars, the last two are both claimed by Armenians as well). The point that I think should be made is that the Cappadocian Greeks are both Greek and native to Cappadocia. That is, they are the indigenous people of Cappadocia, since the indigenous Indo-European groups of Anatolia, groups like the Phrygians of King Midas of the golden-touch, who spoke an Indo-European language related to Greek, came to speak only Greek by early Roman times and were some of the first to embrace christianity, which would become Greek Orthodoxy after the schism. Thus the expulsion of the Greek Orthodox Cappadocians by the modern Turkish state was all the more tragic, because it was, in the colonialist parlance of our times, the expulsion of the natives from their native land by the colonizers. There is sometimes a misconception that the Greeks of Turkey were interlopers in Turkey, but this is not correct. They were Greek, and had played a huge role in ancient Greek history, supplying Hellenistic mathematicians, famous Greek church figures in Roman times, imperial Greek dynasties in Byzantine times, and Greek architects and patriarchs in Ottoman times, but they were also native Anatolians. Population genetics also bears this out, as studies have shown regional differences in Hellenic populations attributable to their archaic indigenous roots (Minoans in Crete, Phrygians etc in Anatolia).

Btw I agree with you (in the Lemnos article) that Kaldellis overstates his case on the use of the term "Romioi," particularly when he says "preserved in isolation," as if the term were some relic on the island, rather than being widely used by Greeks throughout the Ottoman Empire at the time. I didn't at first understand your concern in that article, and apologies for that, but now I do. Piledhighandeep (talk) 00:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Piledhighandeep! I am glad you understood my point in doing this. To be honest, at the beginning I thought you were trying to spoil such articles with controversial edits but now I can see that it was just a misconception. Also, thank you for your edits at articles like the ones which you mentioned above. Continue your good work and have a nice day! NickTheRipper (talk) 21:47, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Can you please ...
... explain this edit? Notice that you left that sentence ungrammatical. DId you read through the cited Plutarch work? Paul August &#9742; 19:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry for that. I don't quite remember making this edit and the reason I did it. I maybe thought that the phrase was not in the source and was added later to dismiss the opinion of Herodotus making the article subjective and not according to POV rules. Anyway, sorry for this and I will try not to edit Wikipedia while drunk again! NickTheRipper (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Niphates (Persian general)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Niphates (Persian general), NickTheRipper!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for creating this. Can you please make the reference a bit clearer? To someone not an expert in the area, I can't work out where to go for more info."

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 05:44, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding that map
Please stop mass inserting that hoax map. Assuming WP:GF, I guess you didn't view the image details. It was made by a sock of CU blocked sockmaster who was indeffed for persistent hoaxing, socking, and making copyvios. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:48, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Well, whoever the creator was, the map seemed accurate enough and is the only one in wikipedia depicting all the satrapies of the Achaemenid Empire together. That's why I thought it was essential to insert this map on many of the satrapies articles, considering that the majority of them did not have one (or even a single image). However, if you think that the particular map contains serious mistakes then I am willing to help you remove the images. Also, I noticed that you reverted some of my other edits which have nothing to do with the map itself. Can you explain that? The rv button is not a game and I am sure you know that. Nevertheless, thank you for letting me know about this. NickTheRipper (talk) 17:15, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Ehm. You dropped that map on literally 30 +/- articles . Sorry, but separating the wheat from the chaff (and it was definetely mostly chaff, in other words most of the edits, were about the map) would cost ridiculous amounts of time. Feel absolutely free to restore the good copy-edits and fixes. I already restored a few of them. All the best, - LouisAragon (talk) 19:58, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Arbupales
Hi, I'm Boleyn. NickTheRipper, thanks for creating Arbupales!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as uncategorised and as a stub.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 12:02, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Omares
Hi, I'm Boleyn. NickTheRipper, thanks for creating Omares!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as uncategorised and as a stub.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 12:03, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
For your recent article Rheomithres that I read with great interest. Keep it up, just make sure to add a variety of sources.

Arbustum (talk) 18:24, 10 September 2017 (UTC) 

Battle of Gaugamela edits
Your edits seem to have made some of the information on troop numbers nonsensical, and I was hoping you could fix it up. Specifically, you took a range of 10K to 30K for "Peltasts" and changed it to a range of >40K (low) to 30K (high) (and made it refer to "Infantry"), which is clearly nonsensical. Could you please clear that up? I'm guessing it should be 10K to >40K, but you clearly checked a lot of sources and I'd prefer you recheck that one bit. &mdash;ShadowRanger (talk 01:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot. The "30,000" number was there before I start edditing the page and I was planning to replace it. However, I didn't have the time to do it and I ultimately forgot it. I guess now makes some sense until someone finds a source to specify the number. Unfortunately I do not have the time to make edits in wiki this period so I hope someone deals with this. Have a nice day. NickTheRipper (talk) 10:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest
Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women during this month for your region or wherever please sign up in the participants section. The articles done may also count towards the ongoing challenge. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles please add them to the sub lists by continent at Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:22, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Aesop
While I accept that there is no ethnicity parameter in the Infobox, to label Aesop as Greek is still contentious and requires discussion on the Talk page. There you will find suggestions that he was of African origin - or he might equally have been of Thracian or West Asian origin. Added to which there was no such 'nationality' as Greek at the time of his supposed dates. There wasn't even a standard Greek language, just a collection of dialects. You will need consensus for your change and I am therefore reversing it. Sweetpool50 (talk) 18:43, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Rise of Macedon --> HELLENIC KINGDOM
New WP:CONSENSUS Building. "Greek" or "Hellenic" precedes "kingdom" in the first sentence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dragao2004 (talk • contribs) 04:36, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week
Hello there. This is an invitation to join the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week. £250 (c. $310) up for grabs in May, June and July with £20 worth of prizes to give away every week for most articles destubbed. Each week there is a different region of focus, though half the prize will still be rewarded for articles on any subject. Articles may be submitted for this as well as the regional Challenge you usually contribute to at the same time. Sign up if you want to contribute at least one of the weeks or support the idea! † Encyclopædius  19:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions
Cabayi (talk) 20:14, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vorotan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Artsakh. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Petenes


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Petenes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Артём 13327 (talk) 18:32, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert
—Michael Z. 22:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)