User talk:Nick Amato/Mass media in Zambia/Jackylopez123 Peer Review

Jacqueline's Peer Review
What does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? This could be information, writing, etc. that you think your classmate should not change and/or should expand on.
 * 1) Great Article! My article talks about a similar topic. I was impressed by your introduction paragraph. I like how you mention the topic of decolonization.

Where do you see room for improvement or further development? Make sure to explain why these changes would improve the article. What's the most important thing the authors could do to improve the article?
 * 1) I believe you can expand on the different types of form of media that Zambia has. For example, you can add more information under the section on Radio and Television. These changes can improve the article because they allow readers to know which specific media devices are used in Zambia.
 * 1) The most important thing the authors could do to improve is to add pictures. Authors could add empirical statistics.

Is the article well-organized? Does the structure make sense?
 * 1) Yes the article is well organized. I do feel as though the section on the freedom of the press should be placed first. All other sections about the internet, press and the radio should then follow after.

Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!
 * 1) I believe that my article can also use the separation of media devices as this article does.

As a reader, what else would you like to know about this topic? [Of course, this information may not be readily available in all cases, but it can help generate interesting directions for their research]
 * 1) I would like to know what percentage of Zambians have these media devices.