User talk:Nick Miroslavov

March 2023
Hello, I'm Onorem. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Onorem (talk) 15:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, Onorem. I am showing you a detailed analyz of the film called Croupier. Let's add this link if it is possible because you can use this information about the article.
 * Thank you for the attention! Nick Miroslavov (talk) 15:05, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * There doesn't appear to be anything special about this particular review. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, and isn't here to drive traffic to random casino websites. Onorem (talk) 15:17, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Onorem (talk) 15:23, 18 March 2023 (UTC)


 * This is not a promotion.. we are showing our review to people's who wants to watch this film. And we are not a casino. Nick Miroslavov (talk) 15:26, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It certainly looks like promotion. Why this review? What does this review offer that can't be found in the hundreds, or probably thousands, of other reviews of the film? You also appear to have a conflict of interest in wanting to include this link. Onorem (talk) 15:42, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * This isn't a promotion and i don't have have a conflict of interest in wanting to include this link. This is just to help with something.. Nick Miroslavov (talk) 15:47, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It's an odd coincidence if there's no promotion or conflict of interest going on here. Last week, a user named Lucas Martin added the link. There is a Lucas Martin that works as a content contributor at CasinoLandia. Today, you add the link. There is a Nick Miroslavov that works as the COO at GameLandia. Even if that is just a coincidence, you haven't explained why this review belongs in the article. It adds nothing to the article. Who is Oliver Garcia, and why is a link to his review important enough to be included? That's really the question that matters the most. Onorem (talk) 15:57, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Oliver Garcia is a content creator who wrote the article about Croupier. We want to improve the Wikipedia's article for Croupier with information that we provide for ourselfs. If it is needless to make changes of the Wikipedia's Article for Croupier. We will do this for sure (if you say yes of course).
 * Please accept my apologies for the duplicate accounts. The mistake is on my side!
 * Best Regards Nick Miroslavov (talk) 16:22, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Using multiple accounts for inappropriate purposes is prohibited on Wikipedia. How many accounts do you operate - just this one and "Lucas Martin 910"? Or are there more? --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Lucas Martin is my colleague. I am operating with this one only. Could you please block Lucas Martin 910. Sorry for the misunderstanding again. Nick Miroslavov (talk) 14:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Blocks are preventative, not punitive. They are used as a last resort to prevent a user who refuses to stop their disruptive behaviour from causing further damage. Your colleague appears to have stopped his inappropriate edits after getting a couple of warnings, so there's no reason to block. He can either try to edit constructively going forward, or he can also choose not to edit at all anymore. However, if he resumes being disruptive, then a block might be considered. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:12, 19 March 2023 (UTC)--Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:12, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok thank you. Is there a chance to place my link on the article called Croupier Film from 1998? This is not a promotions and I don't have a conflict of interests. We want to share our review with you and we want to be useful to society.
 * Best Regards Nick Miroslavov (talk) 15:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * No, because your site does not meet Wikipedia's definition of a reliable source. Reliable sources are sources that have an established reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. This heavily favours mainstream news organizations, academic press, and reputable publishers of newspapers, books and magazines. Sources of dubious or unknown provenance will not be considered. Also any site that has self-published or user-generated content is also unacceptable. This disqualifies nearly all social media, blogs or message forums.
 * You also have a commercial interest in people coming to your website. Therefore it would be considered a conflict of interest for you to add links directing readers to your site, no matter how good your intentions may be. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * You can check our blog for news. We can remove the author of the page for Croupier Film. My interest is to help the wikipedia with my content. What can I do to place my link on this page? Nick Miroslavov (talk) 17:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * You're not going to get an answer from me that will endorse the use of your website as a source. Feel free to ask others at the Teahouse if you must, but I suspect that their answers will be the same as mine. Sorry, but I have nothing more to say on the matter. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 23:11, 19 March 2023 (UTC)