User talk:Nick from MrBet

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mr Bet (November 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StartOkayStop was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mr Bet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mr_Bet Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StartOkayStop&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mr_Bet reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

StartOkayStop (talk) 06:11, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello Nick from MrBet. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nick from MrBet. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. StartOkayStop (talk) 06:12, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:Mr Bet, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Nick from MrBet, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but I do not quite understand what is required of me. I did not hide any information, I work in a company, and my task is to accurately describe about us. I did not use any advertising in the article, only facts. And as you can see from my nickname, I did not hide the fact that I work in a company. Perhaps I misunderstand your requirements? Nick from MrBet (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)


 * you have not followed the guidance above, namely you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nick from MrBet . The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: .  Although you have not concealed your COI, which is why I haven't blocked you yet, you haven't made the mandatory user page disclosure either Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your help! Did I understand correctly - I need to add information about myself? Can you please tell me where to do it? Also, I didn't understand what kind of disclosure I should make of the user Jimfbleak - I don't know him. Nick from MrBet (talk) 11:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * OK, you seem a bit confused about templates and the disclosure format. I understand. Look at User:Nick from MrBet. I put what I believe is the proper form there. Please confirm and edit it if it is wrong. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:48, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you a lot! I was confused with the templates, so your impact is extremely helpful 🙏 Now I understand what was expected from me сlearly. All information in the User:Nick form is correct and I approve it.
 * May you advise if I need to do anything else for you to review the article now? Nick from MrBet (talk) 11:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Good morning!
 * Please tell me my next steps. Do I just have to wait or do I need to submit the article for approval again? Since it is in the status removed. Nick from MrBet (talk) 06:58, 26 January 2023 (UTC)