User talk:Nickbatz

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information.
 * Please also read Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal--Dbratland (talk) 03:40, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Also. You should read Self-published sources (online and paper) to help understand that Wikipedia does not consider discussion forums to be reliable, verifiable sources. Wikibooks is a good place to submit how-to instructions, but you still need better sources than talk forums.--Dbratland (talk) 06:02, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. --Dbratland (talk) 06:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.
 * Have you looked at Wikibooks? Or WikiHow?  There are appropriate Wikis that accept how-to advice.  --Dbratland (talk) 17:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A le_Jrb talk 18:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

unblock|Yes, no problem.
 * An indefinite block was clearly too harsh for a first time editor who, it appears, was making an honest mistake. I would strongly suggest reading WP:RS and the aforementioned pages cited above, especially WP:NOTHOWTO and WP:No original research. Please take some time to read up on the Wikipedia editing process, which is very different from how magazine editing operates.  And please feel free to contact me on my Talk Page if you have any questions.  Good luck! Pastor Theo (talk) 03:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: See also, , and . Compare with . Then see blatantly disruptive edits, including and . Thanks, Cirt (talk) 03:46, 10 September 2009 (UTC)