User talk:Nickbrisket/CLAWS linguistics

From where you guys started off with originally vs what you guys ended up with for a rough draft is pretty awesome, considering the OG article was bare. It's pretty impressive that you found so much already. I like that you guys have an outline area involved for organizing the article as well, but I think it might be more helpful to make these already included in the Wikipage instead of making its own area for the organization. You can use each title/header to organize your thoughts and to dump everything relevant about that topic under the header, but I like the direction guys have gone towards and the organization you guys are inputting. I think it will also be more helpful to include the resources for each header under their specific header. So all the resources for history would be under the section of history as well. These are just ways to organize it somewhat more, but these are nonetheless suggestions. I also really like the idea of including similar articles on the bottom, and I think my group would benefit a lot from incorporating that as well. This will help ease any questions the reader might have whilst reading the article, and it's just a simple link to incorporate to make it easier to travel to. Jellybean745 (talk) 00:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

-I think one thing that should be discussed is the difference between CLAWS and others of its kind. -Something that can be very useful for those who intend to do syntactic analysis in corpus linguistics is including a sample of tagging a text with CLAWS. Especially if it is a famous piece of text from a famous author. -I noticed that in the plans for the page, disadvantages of the CLAWS are included. I am not sure this is a good idea. A pros and cons section in a page that should primarily describe something not critique it may not be a welcome addition. Hammed.MP (talk) 19:00, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

a) The sections outlined to be elaborated are very well thought of. I especially agree with different versions of the software. Yet I believe each should be discussed with the years of release and the features added, improved or removed in each iteration. b) Something that can be added is how one can access with links to the access points. Samira Hamzehei (talk) 20:15, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Wow, what a rough start for the article with just a single sentence. If that isn't a stub, I don't know what is! I really like the amount of sources that you have listed, and the idea of adding the benefit of CLAWS as well as the explanation of tags. The breakdown that you have is pretty clear and easy to follow. Are you going to explain what the NLP has to do with POS tagging? I try to think that most people googling or looking at Wikipedia articles who may come across our various articles will not necessary know all things linguistics :) I really like the idea that you guys are adding the history and purpose for tagging. What does CLAWS stand for...why it was implemented..how it was used. That's important information. I also like the fact that you are adding the algorithm and lots of linking articles. Great start! Jen35n (talk) 21:41, 22 March 2020 (UTC)