User talk:Nickelroy

Welcome!
Hello, Nickelroy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Buster Seven   Talk  18:30, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Getting Started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

New Page Patrol
Hi. Thank you  for patrolling  new pages. I  saw you  reviewed Sarah Grey  but  did not  leave a message on  the creator's talk  page. I understand your  enthusiasm  to  jump  right  in  and help  maintain  the quality  of our pages, however, New Page Patrolling  requires considerable experience which  is generally  demonstrated through several  hundred contributions to  content.

As you have only  made 11 edits to  Wikipedia, I  am  asking  you therefore not  to  patrol pages until  you  have read and fully  understood the instructions at  WP:NPP and the policies and guidelines at  WP:DELETION, and gained considerably  more experience. If you  have any  questions, don't  hesitate to  ask  me on  my  talk  page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:51, 17 November 2013 (UTC).

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Sarah Grey, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:52, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your reverts in Aurangabad, Maharashtra
The culture of India refers to the way of life of the people of India. India's languages, religions, dance, music, architecture, food, and customs differ from place to place within the country. The Indian culture, often labelled as an amalgamation of several cultures, spans across the Indian subcontinent and has been influenced by a history that is several millennia old. This definition goes similar to Aurangabad culture. Read culture of India for more details. Namvistar Din is part of culture so you can not delete from Aurangabad culture. Two times you have deleted the photo of Namvistar Din celebration. Third time you will be blocked according to WP:BLOCK. JAIBHIM5 (talk) 21:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes, but you still fail the argument. There is nothing to suggest that suggests Namvistar day has anything to do with Aurangabad's culture or its people. Please come with a source that says that this celebration is a part of Aurangabadi culture. Please refer to Citing sources before you add any content. Thanks.Nickelroy (talk) 05:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The source is added with PHOTOGRAPH. Now you refer WP:BLOCK. JAIBHIM5 (talk) 12:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

--Your source is not connected with the article Nickelroy (talk) 03:50, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

I am waiting to get your answer on Auragabad talk page for removing Namvistar Din photograph
In teahouse you stated "I have no personal reason to strike out the picture." You have targeted this particular image for more than month. Since you targeting photograph in culture section, your answer over your editing is relevant. Why you did not remove pictures of Ajanta and Ellora caves pictures? Do you support ISKON is called integral part of Aurangabad culture? The culture does not depend on time period length or as you stated "The ceremony does not imbibe any traditional values" this is your POV. You have stated "The issue is your picture here which has nothing to do with the tradition of Aurangabad." The source itself states Political parties arranging the gatherings (here) have become a "tradition".. Your editing in general states Namvistar Din related with University celebrations. Is it true? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JAIBHIM5 (talk • contribs) 12:05, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

waiting
You should have a look at WP:HA and WP:BRD for your image removal in various articles. Still waiting to get answers on Aurangabad page. JAIBHIM5 (talk) 00:37, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Still waiting
Still waiting to get answers on Aurangabad talk page for removing Namvistar Din photograph. If not satisfactorily answered, image will be inserted in culture section. JAIBHIM5 (talk) 18:49, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * You have not answered. JAIBHIM5 (talk) 14:29, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

WP:HA and WP:BRD, images fulfill wiki policies
You should have a look at WP:HA and WP:BRD for your recent image removal in various articles. Answer separately on each talk page of article if you find an irrelevant image. Waiting to get answers on Aurangabad page and all pages. JAIBHIM5 (talk) 13:32, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Did you read it? Still waiting. JAIBHIM5 (talk) 21:56, 18 April 2014 (UTC)


 * You are affiliated with this community that celebrates the Namvistar ceremony. You are promoting pictures related with your community in every other article hence it does not qualify under Conflict of interest and Vested interest.


 * Images fulfill wiki policies. Your are doing Harassment. You have to discuss for your removal according to BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. You can not remove unless you discuss on each talk page. JAIBHIM5 (talk) 20:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

JAIBHIM5 and Nickleroy edit reversions
and : The constant reverting of each others' work is borderline disruptive. Regardless of which of you is "right" regarding a given edit and regardless of whether or note either or both of you have violated Wikipedia's 3 revert rule, you both need to find a better way to collaborate. Assuming both of you are relatively new to Wikipedia and have not edited before under other accounts, it's doubtful you both have a complete understanding of Wikipedia guidelines and policies.

I recommend that you both come to some kind of agreement like "before either of us inserts a picture on a topic we care about or reverts each other's edit, we will put a note on the article's talk page and notify the other editor, then wait 24 hours after any discussion dies down before making the edit." The agreement doesn't have to be what I just said - just make some kind of agreement with each other so the rest of us don't see rapid-fire back-and-forth edits.

If you cannot agree with each other about how to collaborate effectively, you both might consider utilizing one of Wikipedia's established dispute resolution procedures.

I am posting this message to both of your talk pages. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  23:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC) Diffs: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJAIBHIM5&diff=604948354&oldid=604799154] and [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANickelroy&diff=604948343&oldid=604923639]. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  23:47, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Article upgrade assistance request (Pre-translation stage)
Seasons Greetings,

This is in reference to a relatively new umbrella article on en-wikipedia named Ceremonial pole. Ceremonial pole is a human tradition since ancient times; either existed in past at some point of time, or still exists in some cultures across global continents from north to south & from east to west. Ceremonial poles are used to symbolize a variety of concepts in several different world cultures.

Through article Ceremonial pole we intend to take encyclopedic note of cultural aspects and festive celebrations around Ceremonial pole as an umbrella article and want to have historical, mythological, anthropological aspects, reverence or worships wherever concerned as a small part.

While Ceremonial poles have a long past and strong presence but usually less discussed subject. Even before we seek translation of this article in global languages, we need to have more encyclopedic information/input about Ceremonial poles from all global cultures and languages. And we seek your assistance in the same.

Since other contributors to the article are insisting for reliable sources and Standard native english; If your contributions get deleted (for some reason like linguistics or may be your information is reliable but unfortunately dosent match expectations of other editors) , please do list the same on Talk:Ceremonial pole page so that other wikipedians may help improve by interlanguage collaborations, and/or some other language wikipedias may be interested in giving more importance to reliablity of information over other factors on their respective wikipedia.

This particular request is being made to you since your user name is listed in Translators available list.

Thanking you with warm regards Mahitgar (talk) 05:57, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Bytz tagged for deletion
Hello Nickelroy, I wanted to let you know that I've tagged Bytz for deletion because the article is too promotional for an encyclopedia. If you feel that this assessment is incorrect, you can either edit the article to remove the promotional parts or you can click on the " Contest this deletion " button and explain it on the talk page, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. Wikipedia's guide for editors with a conflict of interest and guidelines on neutrality may be of interest. – Thjarkur (talk) 09:20, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The article also doesn't explain how the subject is notable enough for an encyclopedia, and I didn't find any coverage which would suggest that Wikipedia's general notability guidelines were met. – Thjarkur (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2021 (UTC)