User talk:Nickney3

Speedy deletion nomination of Motorola Xphone
Hello Nickney3,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Motorola Xphone for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Kevin12xd (contribs) 02:33, 24 February 2013 (UTC)


 * While the speedy deletion criteria used by Kevin21xd doesn't exactly apply, I went ahead and deleted it per WP:IAR and WP:NOTBURO. There is no doubt that that article would be deleted eventually, because it was nothing more than speculation based on rumours. Per WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not for speculation of this type. It may be appropriate to include some of that info in the Motorola (or a similar page), but only if the sources are very good. But we can't have a standalone article on a phone that may or may not ever exist, and even if it does, may bear absolutely no resemblance to the current rumours. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:23, 24 February 2013 (UTC)