User talk:Nicknikio

Your submission at Articles for creation: NICKNIKIO (April 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NICKNIKIO and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NICKNIKIO, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:NICKNIKIO Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KJP1&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:NICKNIKIO reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 06:21, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello, I'm KingAndGod. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Exo (band), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. King And God 08:49, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. King And God 08:49, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NICKNIKIO (April 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NICKNIKIO and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NICKNIKIO, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:NICKNIKIO Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:NICKNIKIO reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Kirbanzo (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Userfied - Nick Joong to sandbox
Hey, there! I'm KingAndGod. I wanted to let you know that I've moved your article (Nick Joong) out of the article space. The article does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved the article to your sandbox where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and are ready to submit it for review, place at the bottom of the article and click "Publish changes". To reduce the chances of deletion, it is best to let a reviewer accept the submission rather than move it yourself as other editors could tag it for deletion immediately. If you would like to experiment, please use the public sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. King And God 17:33, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 21:44, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Nick Joong for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Joong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nick Joong& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 18:48, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Nick Joong for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Joong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nick Joong& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia / cheap shit room 19:01, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nick Joong


A tag has been placed on Nick Joong, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Quek157 (talk) 19:29, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nick Joong


A tag has been placed on Nick Joong, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Quek157 (talk) 19:34, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nicknikio/sandbox


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that User:Nicknikio/sandbox, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:3164:A7CC:68AF:4311 (talk) 20:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nick Joong.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Nick Joong.jpg, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * The image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. (See section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:3164:A7CC:68AF:4311 (talk) 20:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you do not cease your blatantly promotional and disruptive editing your next block will be indefinite. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Would you be against extending this into an indefinite block? Please see my closing rationale at Articles for deletion/Nick Joong (2nd nomination). This user is not here to build an encyclopedia. ℯ xplicit 02:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:08, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
--UTRSBot (talk) 08:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

unblock Nicknikio
User:Ad Orientem

331dot
User:331dot  Actually i am not a showing off to others that i am as south korean boy band. Nick joong is a south korean singer i am just trying that if it will work or not on the semi protected pages if i edit but it worked and i have entered nick joong's name in the article that was my mistake but i was just checking it. Nicknikio 08:35, 18 May 2018 (UTC)


 * So you aren't from India as believes? 331dot (talk) 08:46, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

No i am from India User:331dot and my apologies for making my test edits on other article i am sincerely being sorry i was just trying to make some use in the wikipedia and also user User:Explicit he always makes my edit deletes if you can please unblock me again i won't do an disruptive edits Nicknikio 08:53, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * In your unblock request that I declined, I explained the things that you need to do that are most likely to get you unblocked, but it's not a guarantee, and your edits don't help. Another administrator will be reviewing your request. 331dot (talk) 08:58, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

I live in South Korea, so I would really love to hear more about how Nick Joong is under SM Entertainment, how he's a member of Exo, and all these other claims you've made. For administrators, please see the deleted text of User:Nicknikio, where the subject states he's from India. <b style="color:#4B0082;">ℯ</b> xplicit 00:26, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

User:Explicit Nick joong is not a member of exo he is an artist under s.m entertainment i just wrote his name on exo band page that if i edit this will really work or not i am testing it if i create an article if it stays or get's deleted i am just checked it. After i created it you have seen it and deleted it for creating Hoax a fake article. Then i have realized it wikipedia will only accept the reliable sources.Nicknikio 03:52, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

UNBLOCK

 * Id like to propose the following conditions for unblocking. 1) No more edits about Nick Joong under any variant or different spelling. No edits about anyone connected with SM Entertainment or Exo. 2) Please explain how you avoid making promotional edits. 3) Please give us your understanding of Wikipedia's policy on material copyrighted elsewhere. How must content be licensed to be used on Wikipedia? 4) Please explain in your own words what is meant by "all content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." 5) Detail what constructive edits would you make.-- <b style="color:black">Dloh cier ekim </b> (talk) 18:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

user:Dlohcierekim i promise that i will do no more edits about Nick Joong and no more edits who are connected with SM Entertainment or Exo (band). I would like to make only useful edits only by respecting Wikipedia policy and copyrighted material and i would use only reliable source which are verifiable to users who will review my edits. Thank you Nicknikio 08:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

user:Dlohcierekim i am waiting for your response.Nicknikio 06:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * You answered the first point above, but only provided a vague generality for the rest of them. Please specifically answer the other points. 331dot (talk) 09:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks 331dot for doing the dirty work. SOmetimes I'm too inclined to not require complete answers.-- <b style="color:black">Dloh cier ekim </b> (talk) 11:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * And then there is this... User:Songoku21. [Returning to my vacation.] -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:41, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Should an SPI be filed for the record? &raquo; Z0  &#124;  talk  08:50, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's necessary as it's a check user block. But I don't see how an unblock request can be granted at the present time. I suggest the request be declined with the understanding that Nicknikio can request a standard offer in six months. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)