User talk:NickolausPacione

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

License tagging for Image:Nick 2006 at Neo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nick 2006 at Neo.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 14:06, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Autobiographical Article
I believe that your article may do better as the front page of your user page (i.e., something like this: []). I make this suggestion with an eye towards WP:AUTO, which concerns autobiographical articles, and WP:BIO, which is about biographies in general. - Saaber 15:37, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop reposting WP:VAIN-violative articles/images. Continuing to do so will be construed as vandalism and be dealt with as such. --Nlu (talk) 07:47, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. Yanksox 16:47, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Brian Keene, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you believe the article should be deleted, file a proper AfD. --Nlu (talk) 17:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Look, some of Keene's buddies vandalized me when someone had some legitimate about me on wiki. so do you think that is a little fair when the person had a good source about me. Come on if you have a problem with that speak with me on my email not on here. I just stated a fact that that was something Brian Keene does -- vandalizes posts by others on blogs and message boards. Trying to make them looking like a flaming homo, I didn't exactly vandalize it just stated a fact about him, showing people what Keene truly is. Give me the proper channels to get his page deleted on here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NickolausPacione (talk • contribs)


 * Making unsubstantiated (and unsubstantiable) accusations will usually not get you anywhere. But take a look at WP:AFD.  --Nlu (talk) 08:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

It is a fact, Keene had harassed my family on more than one occasion at my home then came to my message boards as characters I created with my fiction. Tell me something, who the hell are you to say I wasn't legitimate enough to get wikipedia article. Who edited the article that made me look like some kind of faggot! I've been published legitimately enough so I want to request an article tag. This is bullshit that you listen to the people that hate my guts before you listen to me. Don't you think that is fair. It's not -- its complete and utter bullshit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NickolausPacione (talk • contribs)
 * The Wikipedia community has judged you to be insufficiently notable. I am not going to continue this conversation.  Your incivility means that, if you continue this, you will be blocked.  --Nlu (talk) 02:02, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

I do have proof that Koehler is a vanity publisher -- and the proof is in http://www.whois.net and punch in the company address her books are published with and it is listed under her brother, Todd Koehler. You want more proof than that drop me an e-mail and I will give you more than that. The article for mike Philbin was unfairly deleted and so was mine. You delete Authors like Philbin and mine when you allow a vanity publisher Karen Koehler up there.