User talk:Nickvet419/Archive 1

License tagging for Image:Nickvet419.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nickvet419.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Roxanne Modafferi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Roxanne Modafferi.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok   ☠  02:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:LeeShone.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LeeShone.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 10:40, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Andrew Chappelle
Andrew Chappelle, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Andrew Chappelle satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Andrew Chappelle and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Andrew Chappelle during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Thesaddestday 07:07, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Kings Island construction plans 2009.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kings Island construction plans 2009.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:33, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Daniel P. Bolger
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Daniel P. Bolger, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.hood.army.mil/1stcavdiv/about/leadership/cg.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Daniel P. Bolger and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Daniel P. Bolger with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Daniel P. Bolger.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Daniel P. Bolger/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Daniel P. Bolger saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Leo Laursen – ✍ ⌘ 10:18, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Daniel P. Bolger/Temp
Hi Nickvet419. Good to see that the Daniel P. Bolger page is improving. Would You please put a Db-author template on Talk:Daniel P. Bolger/Temp to get it speedy-deleted, if it is no longer needed? Thanks. – Leo Laursen – ✍ ⌘ 10:04, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Talk:Daniel P. Bolger/Temp
Talk:Daniel P. Bolger/Temp, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Daniel P. Bolger/Temp and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Daniel P. Bolger/Temp during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Leo Laursen – ✍ ⌘ 14:53, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Scrapbook CD cover.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Scrapbook CD cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Planet Snoopy (disambiguation)
A tag has been placed on Planet Snoopy (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 04:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikimedia Stories Project
Aloha!

My name is Victor Grigas, I’m a storyteller at the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco working on collecting unique and interesting stories from Wikipedians that can be used to compel donations for the 2011 fundraiser.

I found your user name on this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedians_in_Chicago

If you are interested in participating, and would like to schedule a telephone or Skype interview with me, please send me an email (vgrigas@wikimedia.org) along with any questions or concerns you may have.

Thanks for your time!

Victor, User:Victorgrigas Victor Grigas (talk) 20:37, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

PS If you know of anyone with whom I should speak please let me know :)'

Armour Square
Look, the article already clearly explained that the community area and the neighborhood known as Armour Square are two different things.

And just so you know, I actually live in Bridgeport and have for more than a decade and have family and friends in Armour Square. The provincialism is not only readily apparent, unlike the North Side, it lends a lot more weight to defining the neighborhoods here on the South Side. Your credentials as a mapmaker are not only irrelevant in this case, your edits are simply incorrect and on a couple of counts at that:

1. "Stateway Gardens is still defined as a neighborhood" -- regardless of what the mainly empty lots where Stateway Gardens once stood is not the point. That sliver that you're looking at on the map isn't a neighborhood, it's a patch of grass. Stateway Gardens was entirely across the Ryan in a Bronzeville which is in a separate community area. The Dan Ryan is the eastern border of Armour Square, and there was NEVER was any overlap, which is the main point emphasized by sociologists who document Chicago's history of race relations. You're either too young to remember, or have forgotten the Lenard Clark beating (1994) that emphasized the distinct rift, both geographically and culturally between the black neighborhood adjacent Armour Square and the predominantly Italian section of the neighborhood around the area to the north of the ballpark.

2."...that area about colture" I assume you mean culture, and that is not the point of a Wikpedia article to address. The Community areas are well defined borders, and that is what these article are about. Not abstractions. But, in ay case, just in case you don't understand how things work in this part of town we'll look at example #3...

3. "Bridgeport community area borders Armour Square but Bridgeport Neighborhood takes up most of Armour Square Community area". Again you're wrong. The people who live in Armour Square identify themselves as residents of Armour Square, just as people who live in Bridgeport and you'll find they identify themselves as being from Bridgeport, just as those in McKinley Park will do likewise even though Bridgeport may appear to overlap. They'll still say they're from McKinley Park. Ask a Bridgeporter and someone from Armour Square where the ballpark is and they'll tell you that 35th and Shields ain't Bridgeport. I understand what you're saying, but for someone who claims to know what's what, by making these claims you really are showing you don't seem to know very much about this part of town.Ryecatcher773 (talk) 07:25, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * hmm... what an attack? Is that really needed? Is Wikipedia about personal opinions or facts? I think facts. and the fact is... Community areas were created to have defined areas to chart census data of population and demographics and the articles should reflect that. The neighborhoods themselves should have their own articles as they reflect on the culture of the area and are defined by different boundaries. Armour Square is defined by the city as a community area, and people who live there can clearly say they are from Armour Square, yes. As well as people say they are from the Bridgeport community area. That is fine. But the neighborhood boundaries defined by the City of Chicago are different than the community areas. This is why the neighborhood articles should reflect the neighborhood boundaries and the community area articles should reflect census data and the community area boundaries defined by the City.


 * Not an attack at all. Looking at a map and knowing what's what for what it actually is are two very different things.... something I learned in the Infantry (wink). The articles are about the community areas, not abstracts, which is exactly why the specifics (such as race relations and local opinions) are left out of the article. This is about borders and demographics, as well as a few obviosu factors (e.g Chinatown obviously falls into the Armour Square community area)Ryecatcher773 (talk) 07:50, 20 November 2011 (UTC)


 * No worries. Just like when I look out my window onto 31st Street, I watch it like a hawk.Ryecatcher773 (talk) 07:52, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

chinatown map
As I have stated on the Chicago project talk page, I don't think there are any hard, official lines for neighborhoods. When I first made that maps, I didn't just wing it, I had a source from somewhere. Either way though, common sense says that my map is a much more accurate representation of the neighborhood than the "official" one. -- T orsodo g Talk 02:08, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Again, while those may come from official sources, I don't think they are official lines for the neighborhood. The very idea of an official boundary line for a neighborhood is pretty silly, in my opinion. To say that Chinatown Square isn't in Chinatown is just plain wrong. -- T orsodo g Talk 02:17, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:FPDCC Logo.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FPDCC Logo.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Kings Island
I looked over the recent changes you made on Kings Island. Looks good to me. Creating a 3rd category under Defunct Attractions was a good idea. Since that category is called Attractions however, might want to consider changing the main title of this section to just "Defunct". The spacing for me makes it easier to notice the separation between sections. When a page gets this long, it definitely helps but like you said it's not absolutely necessary. Perhaps at this point, we should move the lists over to a separate Wiki article throwing a link to it on the main KI page? --GoneIn60 (talk) 12:04, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

No problem regarding "Soak City". Feel free to modify the wording/phrasing in that section if you ever feel changes are still needed. My only real concern was keeping it sentence-style as opposed to chart-style. I wasn't trying to be overprotective! I also agree that the article on KI has evolved into one of the best out there on amusement parks, though I may be a little biased! I've been working on Cedar Point and Kings Dominion as well, but both of those still have a long way to go. GoneIn60 (talk) 14:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Edits to Kings Island
Thanks for your contributions to Kings Island. A helpful hint for the future, when making several edits to an article, don't save the page after every edit. Make all of your edits then save it after so the history doesn't list 20 edits from you. --Astros4477 (talk) 13:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Kings Island Timeline, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited List of former Six Flags Great America attractions, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rotor and Mack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Request for Permissions/Rollback Notice
Hello Nickvet419, need to inform you that you have not have given any reason for requesting rollback right on Requests for permissions/Rollback, this might be a mistake and can usually sometimes happen to anyone so need not worry. Do check it and correct it soon :). TheGeneralUser (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * whoops--Nickvet419 (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Rollback
Hello, following a review of your contributions, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please take note of the following:
 * Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
 * Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
 * Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
 * Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
 * Please read Help:Reverting and Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
 * You can test Rollback at New admin school/Rollback
 * You can display the userbox or the  top icon on your user page
 * If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:40, 8 February 2012 (UTC) Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:40, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * thanks--Nickvet419 (talk) 21:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Nickvet419. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Wikih101 (talk) 23:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Diamondback Logo 300dpi-1-.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Diamondback Logo 300dpi-1-.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:31, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Astros4477 (talk) 21:04, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Future of WikiProject Amusement Parks
Hi Nickvet419. I am contacting you because you are listed as one of members of WikiProject Amusement Parks or one of its task forces. I have just started a discussion on the project's talk page regarding the future of the project. I have made four proposals and I would appreciate your comments on them. Thank you Themeparkgc   Talk  23:21, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kings Island Facts


A tag has been placed on Kings Island Facts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Useable content has been merged with Kinds Island.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. '''-- Cheers, Riley   Huntley ''' 02:29, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lists of Kings Island facts


A tag has been placed on Lists of Kings Island facts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

''A10: Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic: Kings Island, unnecessary fork. Useful content merged.''

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. '''-- Cheers, Riley   Huntley ''' 02:54, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
I also replied at my talk page. '''-- Cheers, Riley   Huntley ''' 03:02, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Rollback of edit on Kings Island.
Hello, I would like to ask you to explain the rollback of this edit. Please note that it is not preferred to rollback good-faith edits (which can be considered misuse of the tool). In the future, please revert a single edit using the undo button so a reason can be stated.[1] '''-- Cheers, Riley   Huntley ''' 03:17, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Amusement Park Quarter 2, 2013 Newsletter
21:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Amusement Park Quarter 3, 2013 Newsletter
--EdwardsBot (talk) 20:53, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Edit-a-thon for Ramona Park
Hello -

I am working with the East Grand Rapids MI Public Library as they embark on a GLAM project. I'm a mid-newbie, which is why I'm reaching out....

East Grand Rapids was the home to Ramona Park and to the Jack Rabbit Derby Racer. As a kick-off project they would like to expand Ramona Park during an edit-a-thon. The Library is home to a local history room - a room filled to the ceiling with memorabilia, photos and artifacts from Ramona Park.

The plan is to upload much of this material via Commons (hopefully before the edit-a-thon on October 19, 2013 - coincidentally during Wikipedia Loves Libraries month).

One problem - there are few locally evident Wikipedia editors to actually show up at the library for an edit-a-thon.

Do you think if we set up a Google hangout, you might be interested enough to remote in? There is a possibility of a cool tee-shirt donated by the library for some, too!

I might be able to provide you/this project with a preview of the historical materials - it seems to me there might be more than one article to create.

Also I've come up with a DYK candidate: Did you know that President Gerald Ford worked at Ramona Park, home to one of three derby racers in the US? (The Ford part is true, not quite sure of the derby racer stat, though!)

Thanks for your consideration, Bdcousineau (talk) 00:08, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

List of Kings Island attractions
You realize you're making mass changes to a featured list? I would discuss your proposed changes first on the talk page and wait for feedback before tearing into it. I doubt you're going to have consensus to do all this. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:52, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Amusement Parks Article Clean-Up
Recently, an issue has been brought up regarding the notability of many articles within WikiProject Amusement Parks. As a result, a page has been created regarding this issue as well as a possible solution (which will be on-going). In a nut-shell, certain articles will be picked to be reviewed in each stage and the WikiProject members (you) will decide if the article should be deleted or kept based on Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

I hoping this will work and if it doesn't, oh well...I tried.

More info can be found on the linked page above.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 21 March 2014 (UTC) Sent by Dom497

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Recent addition to Kings Island
Nick, I reverted your recent edits there for a couple reasons. First, an encyclopedia article needs to focus on subject material that is pertinent to the subject. While the "One Team Village" campus is directly related to Kings Island, it's not an essential detail that would make the cut in an academic source such as an encyclopedia. Second, part of the claim says it was built in the old campground overflow location, but the source does not support that claim. Even if you can find a source to back that part, I think it needs to be discussed further on the article's talk page before inclusion. --GoneIn60 (talk) 12:16, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Kings Island construction plans 2009.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kings Island construction plans 2009.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 03:16, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Amusement Park notification
There are recently-posted discussions at WikiProject Amusement Parks you may be interested in contributing to, located here: WT:WikiProject Amusement Parks. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: You are receiving this notification, because you are listed as a participant of WikiProject Amusement Parks.

Category:Wikipedians who contribute to Google Map Maker has been nominated for discussion
Category:Wikipedians who contribute to Google Map Maker has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Adventure Express Logo.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Adventure Express Logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:King Cobra (Kings Island) Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:King Cobra (Kings Island) Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:City Colleges of Chicago Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:City Colleges of Chicago Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 11 July 2023 (UTC)