User talk:Nickwinlund

Speedy deletion of Squirrel (eavesdropping)
A tag has been placed on Squirrel (eavesdropping) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KurtRaschke (talk) 19:12, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I have removed the speedy tag from the article because it does not fit any speedy criteria (not A1, nor A7 or anything else). However, I still believe the article should be deleted, because not a single one of the sources even use the term squirrel, and on top of that WP:NEO. Please feel free to comment on the article's deletion at Articles for deletion/Squirrel (eavesdropping). Thanks.-Andrew c [talk] 13:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)