User talk:NickyLarson29

Welcome!
Hello, NickyLarson29, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Feitian Technologies Co., Ltd., may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AllyD (talk) 05:34, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Feitian Technologies Co., Ltd.


A tag has been placed on Feitian Technologies Co., Ltd., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. AllyD (talk) 05:34, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Deletion
Hi, thanks for message. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked. Note that this was the eighth time this article has been deleted. I deleted your article because
 * It was previously deleted after a deletion discussion, see the message above which explains this.
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. The only source is the company's own website, not neutral.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: It is dedicated... It offers patented products...
 * it's all about what the company does, little about the company itself other than an address. How many employees? Turnover? Profits? Has the company ever received negative publicity? Who are its competitors? Basically, this is just promoting the company's products, not telling us about it.
 * Thank you for suggesting other article for deletion, you can nominate them yourself if you wish. I think RSA is a mistake, it's just a disambiguation page. I'll look at Safenet and VASCO Data Security International later.
 * For your information, Feitian is number 1 in China Asia, providing the biggest banks in the world (chinese of course) Bank of China and ICBC, but since you dont seem aware of the situation since you are writing about birds &mdash; where was that information in the article? I can only assess what's there, it's for the article creator to do the research.
 * ... why don't you delete the Coca cola page?&mdash; your reason?

I hope this helps,  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:17, 28 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I've deleted Vasco, which appears to have been promotional in tone from day 1. I looked at Safenet, but I felt there was too much referenced text for deletion. Instead, I've removed most of the text, which was basically unsourced promotion. I haven't looked at Coca Cola.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  09:33, 28 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for message. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked.
 * The two pages you mentioned were not unambiguously promotional and are not suitable for speedy deletion. They could be edited to change the tone, or alternatively they could be sent for a deletion discussion with the template. GBfan acted correctly in removing the speedy deletion tag, and, as I said above, I didn't speedy delete because I didn't feel that it was the correct procedure.
 * Please assume good faith. GBfan is an experienced editor who acted perfectly correctly. The fact that you don't agree doesn't make him/her guilty of anything
 * Yes, there are people who have an obvious conflict of interest and edit on behalf of companies they work for directly or indirectly. Sometimes they get caught
 *  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)


 * These are the articles which have achieved Good article status. You don't need anything like that length or level of detail, but it's worth taking a look to see what sort of things are included and the general tone of an article. For company articles, you need to make sure that the article is factual and avoid non-neutral language. I'd suggest that you write the article  here initially. Sandboxes are not immune from deletion if they are obvious spam or copyright infringements, but they give you a chance to get the article into shape before it's thrown to the wolves. Let me know if you need any help  Jimfbleak  -  talk to me?  08:49, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Feitian Technologies Co., Ltd. (again)


A tag has been placed on Feitian Technologies Co., Ltd., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. VQuakr (talk) 08:17, 4 July 2013 (UTC)


 * You asked on the now-deleted talk page: Since only the G4 was used to delete it, does it mean that the company name is doomed forever on Wikipedia? How can you compare what was written before with what was written lately?


 * Administrators can view prior versions. While your version was different than the prior ones, the content in your version was even less substantial than prior versions. Also, there was no credible assertion of notability, which would have qualified the article for speedy deletion under WP:CSD anyway, in addition to WP:CSD. Ranking near the bottom of a list of 500 for "fastest growth" isn't a credible claim of notability.


 * If the company never achieves notability as defined by WP:CORP, then yes, it is doomed forever on Wikipedia.


 * I suggest you build this article in your own user space, either in your sandbox, or create a sub-page User:NickyLarson29/Feitian Technologies Co., Ltd.. That way you can work on it at your leisure without someone coming along and speedy-deleting it. Make sure it complies with WP:CORP in that it references significant coverage by reliable independent sources. Drop me a note when you're done and I'm happy to review it, and if it looks good I can move the article to main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 12:16, 4 July 2013 (UTC)