User talk:Nicnote/Archive 2

Notability of Dene Grigar
Hey ,

I disagree that there are notability issues with this page. The scholar's significant research has been cited (major journals and a book with MIT Press), and a number of NEH grants she has successfully completed have also been listed and appropriately referenced.

He curatorial work with major bodies like the Library of Congress and Modern Language association have been appropriately referenced, as have her artistic contributions to major publications.

Not sure what else would be required to establish Grigar's notability?

Thanks!


 * Hello! Thank you for creating Dene Grigar! I tagged it with a notability tag because I don't think she meets WP:NACADEMIC (Please have a read). I may be wrong, and I will take some time to research this further, however I am busy in real life so it may take a while. The main thing you need to prove is that the person had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline. Such as a high-level award, etc. Let me know what you think and if what I say makes sense/is fair to you. Best, Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  22:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Grigar certainly does meet the WP:NACADEMIC guidelines. I think that the fact she is president of the field's main community body, the Electronic Literature Organization, is evidence of significant impact in their scholarly discipline. Again, being invited to curate for the Library of Congress etc all point to major impact, more so than any award. --OutmianYakta (talk) 23:25, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * I've added her Lifetime Achievement Award from the IMDAa to her bio, so can we go ahead and resolve this issue re notability? Thank you! OutmianYakta (talk) 16:41, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay in replying - I've been busy in real life. I really appreciate you taking the time to find more sources and improve the article, rather than being patronising and shouting at me. I have removed the tag. Again, thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia and let me know if you need anything in the future. Best, Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  18:05, 13 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your contribution. OutmianYakta (talk) 19:58, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Shekar dubbing artist
you deleted my page but other page was created for the same person but it is allowed
 * Hi, I honestly don't remember your version of the page, but I imagine that this new one adheres to the rules of Wikipedia better, maybe User:Razer2115 can weigh in on this. Is this new page identical to the one you proposed? Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  08:59, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Whatsoever why you tagged Speedy deletion before I am updating.. Is this fair..??
 * I don't mean to WP:BITE you, but the mainspace is not the place for experimenting, please use your draft space rather than publishing incomplete articles and expecting them not to be deleted. Also please stop trouting me, it wasn't a silly mistake you just published an article that didn't state why the voice actor was important enough to deserve a Wikipedia article and after a certain amount of time two editors decided to mark it for deletion. Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  15:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

However some other voice artist article is available, why not this one ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balaharimurthy (talk • contribs) 10:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4
Hello ,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just reviews, the  backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Rhonard García
Ok. I'm going to add some references from Dominican newspapers to improve it. --MonFrontieres (talk) 00:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! That sounds great Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  08:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Crater Face (film)
Hello Nicnote. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Crater Face (film), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Having been created by a notable person indicates importance/significance (WP:CCSI). Thank you.  So Why  18:55, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


 * PROD'ed with the concern: no independent coverage that cannot be contained on Skyler Page

Speedy deletion declined: Powdair
Hello Nicnote. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Powdair, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Subject might be important/significant (see also Google News/Books hits for this subject) / use WP:PROD or WP:AFD instead to allow other editors to participate in this decision. Thank you.  So Why  19:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

h3h3
hi. you deleted my change where I noted that h3h3 moved from Israel to LA first, then NYC, then back to LA. It's noted in a number of their youtube videos, such as this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21XQcZp4eGI. So they moved to LA from Israel in April 2015 (video was uploaded May 1 2015). The h3h3 videos on both their main channel and Ethan and Hila are all taken in LA, California, and even a few in Las Vegas. And then in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlLq8PY9mQ8, you can see that they moved to NYC in September 2015. And again, their following videos are clearly NYC. It wasn't until this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10BxccZP1kE&t, that they moved from NYC and back to LA in August 2016. There are plenty of references to prove all this. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobsonrl (talk • contribs) 15:52, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for coming back to me on this. I greatly appreciate you referencing this edit. Best, Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  16:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Isaria fumosorosea
Many thanks for your quick review and comment: actually nothing more than an update on Paecillomyces Roy Bateman (talk) 15:52, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Regardless, anything other than promoting your own youtube page (!) is always welcome when doing WP:NPP :) Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  15:55, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

re A page you started (Why We Want You to be Rich) has been reviewed!
Thank you ! What do you think of the new article I wrote about the book by Donald Trump and Robert Kiyosaki:

Why We Want You to be Rich ?

Sagecandor (talk) 16:56, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

A pie for you!

 * I appreciate the pie! Sending templates to established users is generally a big no-no in my books. Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  12:01, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

re Wikipedia:Autopatrolled
Thanks !

I don't think I have 25 new articles yet ... Sagecandor (talk) 16:59, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * aah, most of your work is re-directs, that's why I was confused. Either way, your work is brilliant, even down to adding the Wikiprojects and rating. The moment you have 25 apply straight away at WP:PERM. I know this must have taken a while, so thanks for the hard work and keep it up! Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  17:03, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I don't know how many I have yet. But yeah it took a while. Sagecandor (talk) 19:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Would suggest taking a look at this and this. Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  19:43, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Huh ok, what number do you come up with? Sagecandor (talk) 19:46, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * 23 that are non-redirects, but you have had a couple of deletions, etc. Also a couple are coming up as non-redirects but they are. Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  22:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay so I should wait? Sagecandor (talk) 22:43, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Yup. Make sure you're over the threshold. Also Page mover might be useful to you right now. I would apply for that first if you think it would help Wikipedia, it doesn't hurt. If you get turned away (as I did requesting rollback) you'll have constructive criticism from the admins at WP:PERM. Nicnote •  ask me a question  •  contributions  22:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Eh that's okay, I like leaving redirects. So for the first one, should I wait for 25 or 26 ? Sagecandor (talk) 22:54, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * On the safe side 26 given the deletions, but if they're all the same standard as the article that I reviewed then you should be fine. Again, this is just a base line to give people an idea of what is expected when applying for the permission. Would strongly suggest going for Page mover first as you have a huge amount of moves and the 'not leaving a redirect' is only an option that you may/may not want to use. What you have to remember is that Permisions are not trophies, they're just ways of being able to contribute to the project, but also making everyone else's job easier. Page mover removes crappy redirects that are a pain to sort out for others and Autopat is about reducing the workload for New Page Patrollers. As long as you come in with that frame of mind, you should sail through. Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  23:04, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay. Sagecandor (talk) 23:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

New one: Midas Touch (Trump Kiyosaki book). Sagecandor (talk) 14:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
For being a sweetie.

Sagecandor (talk) 14:30, 15 June 2017 (UTC) 
 * That's quite alright! Anything I can do to brighten someone's day Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  18:36, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Issuing warnings to miscreant editors is not rude
Hello, I'm 32.218.43.141. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to User talk:32.218.43.141. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Making gratuitous patronizing comments on user talk pages is rude. 32.218.43.141 (talk) 18:30, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm honestly not sure which part of:
 * Hello, I saw the recent warning template that you put on User:SWP13's talkpage. As I stated in the edit summary, please read the warning template - it clearly states that you should not edit war even if you think you are right. Please talk this out civilly rather than resorting to these templates. Thank you, Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  23:26, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * you found rude or patronising? It is considered bad manners to template warn users who have some sort of established presence (which you have done here again), rather than talk it out using your own words as I have done with you. Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  18:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Don't template the regulars might be of interest to you. Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  18:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * That's an essay, not a policy. Are you confused by the difference? Any Tom, Dick, or Harry can write an essay. "Essays have no official status, and do not speak for the Wikipedia community". They're just one person's opinion. 32.218.43.141 (talk) 19:15, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I think you are putting words into my mouth. I never said that it was a policy, only that you should read it since that is the widespread norm. Quite a few users have a 'don't template me' message on their talkpage because it is considered rude that you can't even put in enough effort to respond to an established user's actions with your own words. Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  19:40, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

re A page you started (Midas Touch (Trump Kiyosaki book)) has been reviewed!
Thank you !!! Sagecandor (talk) 19:37, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem :) Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  19:43, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * After creating articles on The Case for Impeachment and The Plot to Hack America, thought I'd help balance out the wiki with some books authored by Trump, if ya know what I mean. Sagecandor (talk) 19:46, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh you communist (!)  Just because Wikipedia is often read out of context I leave this note to anyone who reads this message in the future - this joke relates to how all Democrats are communists because they believe in socialised medicine (which is basically a human right here in Europe), whilst Republicans are gun-loving rednecks or whatever. It is meant in jest. Yeah, so now try taking this out of context now. I dare you!  Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  19:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You joke while I make glorious benefit Wikipedia for to having of article. Sagecandor (talk) 20:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

New article you might like, Insane Clown President. Sagecandor (talk) 18:16, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Followed by, Time to Get Tough. I lost track, how many is that now? Sagecandor (talk) 15:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Confused why my comment was deleted?
Hi Nicnote, i am just writing to you as i dont understand why my comment was perceived as being offensive and my edits were deleted. It would be greatly appreciated if you could explain why. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielLerish (talk • contribs) 11:41, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, the comment "What is your deal?", is usually not recieved very well. I'm assuming that English is not your first language, so it may not sound rude to you, but it's pretty provoking/uncivil. Can you link me the three sources that you think should back-up your edits? Thanks, Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  21:42, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

assistance
I want to thank you for helping to give assistance to the editors leaving comments on another editor's page when they have not quickly responded. In some of the cases, I've made additional comments when I think there are other critical issues, but when I do this, I do not mean that I am suggesting you not continue. I do strongly urge you to continue--what one person doesn't spot someone else may.  DGG ( talk ) 19:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * stalking another stalker is greatly appreciated, your additional help is always greatly welcomed - we all have the same goal, improving Wikipedia :D Nicnote say hello!contribs 21:32, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Wow! Thanks for the barnstar! I thought you deserved a well earned break given recent events, so I answered some questions to the best of my ability. Thanks again and anytime! Nicnote say hello!contribs 21:33, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
 * Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Page Curation/Suggested improvements
 * The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
 * User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
 * User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:
 * Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Investment
WikiEditCrunch (talk) 19:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
 * Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!
 * The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: 
 * On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
 * Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.
 * Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.
 * The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

ANI Experiences survey
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:


 * https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.


 * Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Outreach and Invitations:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
 * Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
 * If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: . Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive
 * A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
 * Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. —  TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 
 * ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
 * The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Years new page backlog drive
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:


 * The total number of reviews completed for the month.
 * The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Problems with Cal Net
There is literally nothing 'soapboxy' about this post. And for notability, how are Forbes articles, being a Microsoft Partner of the Year, and being named one of the U.S.'s fastest growing companies NOT notable? This is ridiculous. I'm doing my best to follow the rules and you're making it impossible to contribute to Wikipedia in any way.
 * Hello, nice to meet you too. I think you have the wrong person. Gave a great day, Nicnote say hello!contribs 00:27, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: New Year Backlog Drive results:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
 * We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!
 * We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
 * Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

Feb 12 "disruptive edits"
Hello, I've explained on the discussion page for Feb 12 why I thought those two mentions should be removed. Holidays and Observances is cluttered on just about every day with promoted days. Anyways, didn't mean to be disruptive or engage in a "dispute". --2607:FEA8:D5E0:A24:ED48:C7E0:5F2A:EF7F (talk) 00:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for taking the time to write to me. I would like to thank you for your productive attitude, but unfortunately the criterion you specify is not an official guideline, only a proposal. Currently, any organisation that decides to set a day as an official day of observation is more than welcome to, so you can understand that removing content that is referenced and not in dispute would be disruptive. If you would like to propose the deletion of an article, such as National Freedom to Marry Day, you may take it to WP:AfD. Best, Nicnote say hello!contribs 03:29, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

A&E (Australia)
MOS says to capitalize only the first letter of section titles.76.189.141.88 (talk) 21:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

IP block exempt
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked (through the use of CheckUser) periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. - TNT❤ 18:34, 28 February 2018 (UTC)


 * 6 months per email request - TNT❤ 18:34, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Review Newsletter No.10
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages! ACTRIAL:
 * ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing
 * Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking  place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
 * While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.