User talk:Nicoguaro

License tagging for Image:Plasticity.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Plasticity.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:08, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Creating new articles

 * I reviewed the CAELinux article that I deleted. The article was written like an advertisement (simply a bullet list of features and links to the manufacturer's home page), and was unreferenced to any sources except the producer of the software itself.  I understand that you are unconnected to the manufacturer, but the tone of the article was inappropriate for an encyclopedia.  Try reading The Guide to Writing Your First Article perhaps to learn more about creating an encyclopedic article.  Also, skim a few other articles about similar types of software.  Perhaps that will give you some further idea about how to create a quality article for Wikipedia.  If you only wish to create a short introduction so others can add to it later, you might want to review Stub for more information.  I hope that helps.  Good luck, and if I can help you with anything else, please let me know.  --Jayron32. talk . contribs  05:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Plasticity.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Plasticity.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:54, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

See also section placement
Hello, I've noticed some changes you've made, moving "see also" sections to below "notes" and "references". "See also" should go above "notes" and "references", see Layout. Bubba73 (talk), 04:48, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:ChessBase.PNG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ChessBase.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:53, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9
Hi. When you recently edited List of finite element software packages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solaris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:ChessBase.PNG)
Thanks for uploading File:ChessBase.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ChessBase.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:ChessBase.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Mind Map graphic
Hi, I found a Mind Map graphic attributed to you on http://lgam.wikidot.com/nicoguaro-s-mind-map. It says you have uploaded it to Wiki Commons but unless I am missing something I can't find it. I'd like to reference it properly in a course I am developing. Would appreciate your guidance, thank you ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.189.173.203 (talk) 10:38, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello. The last version of the image here. The original image is not my creation, and you can find it here. If you want a citation, you can try

"Nicolás Guarín-Zapata. 'Mind-Map Guidelines'. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MindMapGuidlines.svg." Nicoguaro (talk) 16:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Perfect, thank you ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.196.165 (talk) 09:06, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much for participating in Translating Ibero-America!
--Anna Torres (WMAR) (talk) 20:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Comment
Images show many facets of math and physics which I treat as the same. No explination or math to prove. Your images show defferintiation and integration. No math behind it and you're optics show color blind people. Show your work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.223.133.232 (talk) 11:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I do not understand what are you talking about. Taking care of your spelling and grammar might help with that. On the other hand, a lot of my images present the source code, allowing to repeat the images with some changing parameters quite easy. --Nicoguaro (talk) 14:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Translating Ibero-America is back! Come and join us :)
Dear Nicoguaro , Hope this message finds you well! Again this year 2017 the Iberocoop network is launching the editing contest "Translating Ibero-American" aiming to position the Ibero-american culture outside our borders :) You can find the contest page here We hope you can join us! Hugs--Anna Torres (WMAR) (talk) 20:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Some details on File:Industrialization per capita 1750-1900.svg


I would appreciate further information about the contents of the journal you pulled this data from.

1. What do the numbers mean? What units are we working with?

2. The chart says "per capita". Did the industry of UK in particular continue to grow past 1880, in absolute terms?

3. Did you design the chart yourself (as implied by the phrasing of this page) or was it, itself, ripped straight from Bairoch's journal? (English is not my first language.)84.250.78.225 (talk) 20:08, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Answers
1. As stated in the image desctiption, the numbers mean relative per capita levels of industrialization in developed countries. The values are compared to the level of the United Kingdom at 1900.

2. I don't know, I suppose.

3. Yes, I made the chart. The code is available in the description page of the image.

A kitten for you!
Thanks for the awesome images! :D

Erynamrod (talk) 13:20, 24 August 2018 (UTC) 

Stress-strain curve
Thank you for your diagram relating stress and strain of low-carbon steel - see your diff. On the Talk page, a User has drawn attention to the fact that your new diagram shows Young's Modulus (the slope) as being "run/rise" but this is incorrect. The previous diagram showed it correctly as "rise/run". Also, in your new diagram "Modulus" is incorrectly spelled as "modulues".

It is a great diagram. I hope you can fix these errors. Dolphin ( t ) 13:09, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Dolphin51, thanks for pointing out the typos. I have fixed them now. --Nicoguaro (talk) 14:33, 6 May 2020 (UTC)


 * That’s very prompt service! Thanks for fixing those things.
 * It appears you tried to “ping” me to let me know you had replied to my comments. It didn’t quite work. To ping someone we have to use two curly brackets; then we insert the letter “u” or the word “ping”; followed by the vertical line that you used; and finally the User’s name. To ping me it will look like just before you hit the “Publish” button. Happy editing! Dolphin ( t ) 22:10, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Adjust graphic
Hallo, you have created this graphic. In the German WP it is used to illustrate surfaces if constant Gaussian curvature (de:Schnittkrümmung). But the hyperboloid is not a surface of constant Gaussian curvature. Can you create a new graphic, where the hyperboloid is replaced by another figure? The formulas are given in de:wp:Grafikwerkstatt. .gs8 (talk) 14:49, 11 July 2022 (UTC)


 * I see what happened... The original figure did have constant Gaussian curvature but the one I redid did not. I don't speak German, so I only replaced the old figure for the new one. I will try with the one that you mention. Nicoguaro (talk) 19:08, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
 * @.gs8, I created the figure. Constant gaussian curvature.svg Nicoguaro (talk) 21:39, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the new figure. That was very fast. I have a question about your new figure (look at the German WP). Can you answer there (you can use English)? Then the discussion about this figure isn't split. .gs8 (talk) 09:59, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)