User talk:NicoleHolmes

Changed wording from "skeptics" to "researchers and academics" to account for the investigative journalism and peer reviewed academic articles on this topic.

Ways to improve J.H. Soeder
Hi, I'm Anne Delong. NicoleHolmes, thanks for creating J.H. Soeder!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hello! Your references would be easier to understand with proper text to go along with the URLs. I had to take out the links to commercial sites in the middle of the article; that's against Wikipedia's policies. Good luck with your editing. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 23:34, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nomination of J.H. Soeder for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J.H. Soeder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/J.H. Soeder until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Ploni (talk) 16:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)