User talk:Nicole Lenz/Fang people /Hauen1jk Peer Review

Nicole's response to the review will be in bold  Peer review This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info Whose work are you reviewing? Nicole Lenz Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Nicole Lenz/sandbox Lead Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Not yet! Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Overall, doesn't address specific topics/sections. Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise! '''I'll make sure to update the lead to include the added sections. I feel like some of the information in the article is present in the lead, but certainly not all'''

Lead evaluation Content Guiding questions: Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, ties into culture! Is the content added up-to-date? Older sources Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Social dynamic is sparse, could add more and organize 'Art' '''I agree. I think the majority are older sources. I'm working on some more updated sources. Social Dynamic is mainly just notes, as well as the Art section.'''

Content evaluation Tone and Balance Guiding questions: Is the content added neutral? Yes Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No Yay!

Tone and balance evaluation Sources and References Guiding questions: Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Social dynamic section has no sources yet! Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes Are the sources current? Somewhat, from the last 40 years Check a few links. Do they work? Yes '''Social Dynamics is mainly just notes from a source. I thought I had listed the source somewhere but I guess not. Whoops!'''

Sources and references evaluation Organization Guiding questions: Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? A bit choppy right now. Needs some more structure/organization! Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Points are broken up well and reflect major points, need more substance/organization. Agreed

Organization evaluation Images and Media Guiding questions:If your peer added images or media (((None))) I did try to add an image, but I dont think it showed up Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Are images well-captioned? Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Images and media evaluation For New Articles Only If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notabilityrequirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? New Article Evaluation Overall impressions Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? I believe once the content is more finalized it'll be a great addition to this article! I would keep the art rooted in context of the culture and how it relates back to other pieces of the article. What are the strengths of the content added? Descriptive, insightful and How can the content added be improved? Structure, more content and thoughtful connection to culture as a whole, pictures and captions would help as well. Overall evaluation I think you have the beginnings of some really good edits! Keep adding and reworking and it will be a really well rounded article. '''Thank you so much! I agree: I have a lot more content to add.''' Nicole Lenz (talk) 19:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)