User talk:Nicole Whitlow Services

Kalisha Buckhanon
Hi. Given the immediate announcing of inappropriateness and references to public "talk" categorizing her listing in terms of "shameless self-promotion" and Ms. Buckhanon as of "no value" (due to not being on the New York Times Best-seller list), I felt it was best to clear it entirely to the sparest information, in deterrent of this as any source or resource for her that a public person would agree with. The top #2 listing for this woman in Google leads to a Wikipedia page that has an upfront and immediate flagging I did not and do not see on similar listings, with much more excess including photography and personal quotes. The "talk" that is privileged above the truthful facts related to her article lead to unfavorable discussion and conjectures of her that this minimalist revision takes care of. It is a conflict of interest in how she should be portrayed. The system of control living people have for how they are discussed and represented is hard enough as it is, without this clear and upfront discrediting of what is stated. Since the prior article (containing information that was once widely public) is flagged as inappopriate by this site's standards, there should be reduction of it to something a person feels comfortable displaying as not entirely subject to such foregrounded claims on its content. I hope you would agree it is not favorable or needed. High internet listings which lead to pages that discuss a much better person and figure in terms of "conflict of interests," "shameless self-promotion" and "no value" are not needed from this realm. There are reviews for that. It also too boldly indicates that this was pitched for herself or vanity, and not for the communal resourcing it was obviously kept to be and like many others. It was complicated to figure out how to edit this, and I did. I wish for respect of this as a democratic realm where all user and participant opinions have value, and are not reduced to as "trivial" as her listing was labeled from the very beginning. Thanks.

I am unclear why you are removing so much sourced material from the Kalisha Buckhanon article. Please discuss on the article's talk page before reverting again. We don't censor Wikipedia for trivial reasons. Thanks! Sea photo Talk 23:18, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I've courtesy-blanked the three-year old conversations on the talkpage, which I gather are the primary issue.  Acroterion   (talk)   00:55, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; you are welcome to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. -- Lear's Fool 23:32, 21 March 2011 (UTC)